Rapid cycle system improvement for COVID-19 readiness: integrating deliberate practice, psychological safety and vicarious learning.

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
Albert Kam Ming Chan, Jenny W Rudolph, Vivian Nga Man Lau, Henry Man Kin Wong, Rosinni Si Ling Wong, Thomas S F Lo, Gordon Y S Choi, Gavin Matthew Joynt
{"title":"Rapid cycle system improvement for COVID-19 readiness: integrating deliberate practice, psychological safety and vicarious learning.","authors":"Albert Kam Ming Chan,&nbsp;Jenny W Rudolph,&nbsp;Vivian Nga Man Lau,&nbsp;Henry Man Kin Wong,&nbsp;Rosinni Si Ling Wong,&nbsp;Thomas S F Lo,&nbsp;Gordon Y S Choi,&nbsp;Gavin Matthew Joynt","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the face of a rapidly advancing pandemic with uncertain pathophysiology, pop-up healthcare units, ad hoc teams and unpredictable personal protective equipment supply, it is difficult for healthcare institutions and front-line teams to invent and test robust and safe clinical care pathways for patients and clinicians. Conventional simulation-based education was not designed for the time-pressured and emergent needs of readiness in a pandemic. We used 'rapid cycle system improvement' to create a psychologically safe learning oasis in the midst of a pandemic. This oasis provided a context to build staff technical and teamwork capacity and improve clinical workflows simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care in Prince of Wales Hospital, a tertiary institution, in situ simulations were carried out in the operating theatres and intensive care unit (ICU). The translational simulation design leveraged principles of psychological safety, rapid cycle deliberate practice, direct and vicarious learning to ready over 200 staff with 51 sessions and achieve iterative system improvement all within 7 days. Staff evaluations and system improvements were documented postsimulation.</p><p><strong>Results/findings: </strong>Staff in both operating theatres and ICU were significantly more comfortable and confident in managing patients with COVID-19 postsimulation. Teamwork, communication and collective ability to manage infectious cases were enhanced. Key system issues were also identified and improved.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To develop readiness in the rapidly progressing COVID-19 pandemic, we demonstrated that 'rapid cycle system improvement' can efficiently help achieve three intertwined goals: (1) ready staff for new clinical processes, (2) build team competence and confidence and (3) improve workflows and procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000635","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: In the face of a rapidly advancing pandemic with uncertain pathophysiology, pop-up healthcare units, ad hoc teams and unpredictable personal protective equipment supply, it is difficult for healthcare institutions and front-line teams to invent and test robust and safe clinical care pathways for patients and clinicians. Conventional simulation-based education was not designed for the time-pressured and emergent needs of readiness in a pandemic. We used 'rapid cycle system improvement' to create a psychologically safe learning oasis in the midst of a pandemic. This oasis provided a context to build staff technical and teamwork capacity and improve clinical workflows simultaneously.

Methods: At the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care in Prince of Wales Hospital, a tertiary institution, in situ simulations were carried out in the operating theatres and intensive care unit (ICU). The translational simulation design leveraged principles of psychological safety, rapid cycle deliberate practice, direct and vicarious learning to ready over 200 staff with 51 sessions and achieve iterative system improvement all within 7 days. Staff evaluations and system improvements were documented postsimulation.

Results/findings: Staff in both operating theatres and ICU were significantly more comfortable and confident in managing patients with COVID-19 postsimulation. Teamwork, communication and collective ability to manage infectious cases were enhanced. Key system issues were also identified and improved.

Discussion: To develop readiness in the rapidly progressing COVID-19 pandemic, we demonstrated that 'rapid cycle system improvement' can efficiently help achieve three intertwined goals: (1) ready staff for new clinical processes, (2) build team competence and confidence and (3) improve workflows and procedures.

COVID-19准备快速循环系统改进:整合刻意练习、心理安全和替代学习。
导论:面对快速发展的大流行,病理生理不确定,弹出式医疗单位,特设小组和不可预测的个人防护装备供应,医疗机构和一线团队很难为患者和临床医生发明和测试强大和安全的临床护理途径。传统的以模拟为基础的教育不是为时间紧迫和应对大流行的紧急需要而设计的。我们使用了“快速循环系统改进”,在大流行期间创造了一个心理安全的学习绿洲。这个绿洲提供了一个环境来建立员工的技术和团队合作能力,同时改善临床工作流程。方法:在威尔士亲王医院麻醉和重症监护科,在手术室和重症监护病房(ICU)进行现场模拟。翻译模拟设计利用心理安全、快速循环刻意练习、直接和间接学习的原则,在7天内完成了200多名员工的51次培训,并实现了系统的迭代改进。模拟后记录了工作人员评价和系统改进情况。结果/发现:手术室和ICU的工作人员在模拟后处理COVID-19患者时明显更加舒适和自信。提高了团队合作、沟通和集体管理传染病病例的能力。还发现并改进了关键的系统问题。讨论:为了在快速发展的COVID-19大流行中做好准备,我们证明了“快速循环系统改进”可以有效地帮助实现三个相互关联的目标:(1)为新的临床流程做好准备;(2)建立团队能力和信心;(3)改进工作流程和程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信