Real-world outcomes associated with vonoprazan-based versus proton pump inhibitor-based therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan.

IF 4.2 3区 医学
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-05-02 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848231168714
Colin W Howden, Erin E Cook, Elyse Swallow, Karen Yang, Helen Guo, Corey Pelletier, Rinu Jacob, Kentaro Sugano
{"title":"Real-world outcomes associated with vonoprazan-based <i>versus</i> proton pump inhibitor-based therapy for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection in Japan.","authors":"Colin W Howden, Erin E Cook, Elyse Swallow, Karen Yang, Helen Guo, Corey Pelletier, Rinu Jacob, Kentaro Sugano","doi":"10.1177/17562848231168714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Japanese guidelines recommend triple therapy with vonoprazan or a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in combination with antibiotics to treat <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) infection. While studies have shown improved eradication rates and reduced costs with vonoprazan <i>versus</i> PPIs, there is little data describing healthcare resource use (HCRU) and treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare patients treated with a vonoprazan-based or PPI-based regimen for <i>H. pylori</i> infection in Japan in terms of their characteristics, HCRU, healthcare costs, clinical outcomes, and treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective matched cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database (July 2014-January 2020) to identify adult patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection and a first observed use of vonoprazan or a PPI in 2015 or later (index date). Patients prescribed a vonoprazan-based or a PPI-based regimen were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching. HCRU, healthcare costs, diagnostic tests, a proxy for <i>H. pylori</i> eradication (i.e. no triple therapy with amoxicillin in combination with metronidazole or clarithromycin >30 days after the index date), and second-line treatment were described during the 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 25,389 matched pairs, vonoprazan-treated patients had fewer all-cause and <i>H. pylori-</i>related inpatient stays and outpatient visits than PPI-treated patients, resulting in lower all-cause healthcare costs [185,378 Japanese yen (JPY) <i>versus</i> 230,876 JPY, <i>p</i> < 0.001]. Over 80% of patients received a post-treatment test for <i>H. pylori</i>. Fewer vonoprazan-treated than PPI-treated patients subsequently received an additional triple regimen for <i>H. pylori</i> infection (7.1% <i>versus</i> 20.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) or a prescription for vonoprazan or a PPI as monotherapy (12.4% <i>versus</i> 26.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) between 31 days and 12 months after the index date.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection who were treated with vonoprazan-based therapy had lower rates of subsequent <i>H. pylori</i> treatment, lower overall and <i>H. pylori</i>-related HCRU, and lower healthcare costs than patients treated with PPI-based therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23022,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562848231168714"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/92/10.1177_17562848231168714.PMC10161293.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231168714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Japanese guidelines recommend triple therapy with vonoprazan or a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in combination with antibiotics to treat Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. While studies have shown improved eradication rates and reduced costs with vonoprazan versus PPIs, there is little data describing healthcare resource use (HCRU) and treatment patterns.

Objectives: To compare patients treated with a vonoprazan-based or PPI-based regimen for H. pylori infection in Japan in terms of their characteristics, HCRU, healthcare costs, clinical outcomes, and treatment patterns.

Design: Retrospective matched cohort.

Methods: We used data from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database (July 2014-January 2020) to identify adult patients with H. pylori infection and a first observed use of vonoprazan or a PPI in 2015 or later (index date). Patients prescribed a vonoprazan-based or a PPI-based regimen were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching. HCRU, healthcare costs, diagnostic tests, a proxy for H. pylori eradication (i.e. no triple therapy with amoxicillin in combination with metronidazole or clarithromycin >30 days after the index date), and second-line treatment were described during the 12-month follow-up period.

Results: Among 25,389 matched pairs, vonoprazan-treated patients had fewer all-cause and H. pylori-related inpatient stays and outpatient visits than PPI-treated patients, resulting in lower all-cause healthcare costs [185,378 Japanese yen (JPY) versus 230,876 JPY, p < 0.001]. Over 80% of patients received a post-treatment test for H. pylori. Fewer vonoprazan-treated than PPI-treated patients subsequently received an additional triple regimen for H. pylori infection (7.1% versus 20.0%, p < 0.001) or a prescription for vonoprazan or a PPI as monotherapy (12.4% versus 26.4%, p < 0.001) between 31 days and 12 months after the index date.

Conclusion: Patients with H. pylori infection who were treated with vonoprazan-based therapy had lower rates of subsequent H. pylori treatment, lower overall and H. pylori-related HCRU, and lower healthcare costs than patients treated with PPI-based therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在日本,幽门螺旋杆菌感染的实际治疗效果与以伏诺普拉赞为基础的质子泵抑制剂治疗相比。
背景:日本指南推荐使用沃诺普拉赞或质子泵抑制剂(PPI)联合抗生素的三联疗法治疗幽门螺旋杆菌(H. pylori)感染。虽然研究表明,与 PPIs 相比,vonoprazan 可提高根除率并降低成本,但有关医疗资源使用(HCRU)和治疗模式的数据却很少:目的:比较日本幽门螺杆菌感染患者在接受以vonoprazan为基础的治疗方案或以PPI为基础的治疗方案时的特征、HCRU、医疗费用、临床结果和治疗模式:设计:回顾性匹配队列:我们利用日本医疗数据中心理赔数据库(2014 年 7 月至 2020 年 1 月)中的数据,确定了感染幽门螺杆菌且在 2015 年或之后(索引日期)首次观察到使用过 Vonoprazan 或 PPI 的成年患者。采用倾向得分匹配法对处方了基于vonoprazan或基于PPI疗法的患者进行1:1匹配。在12个月的随访期间,对HCRU、医疗费用、诊断检测、幽门螺杆菌根除的替代指标(即指数日期后30天以上未使用阿莫西林联合甲硝唑或克拉霉素的三联疗法)以及二线治疗进行了描述:在 25,389 对配对患者中,与 PPI 治疗患者相比,vonoprazan 治疗患者的全因住院和幽门螺杆菌相关门诊就诊次数更少,因此全因医疗费用更低 [185,378 日元(JPY)对 230,876 日元(P. 幽门螺杆菌)]。接受vonoprazan治疗的患者比接受PPI治疗的患者接受额外的三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的人数更少(7.1%对20.0%,p对26.4%,p) 结论:接受vonoprazan治疗的患者比接受PPI治疗的患者接受额外的三联疗法治疗的人数更少(7.1%对20.0%,p对26.4%,p):与接受PPI治疗的患者相比,接受vonoprazan治疗的幽门螺杆菌感染患者随后接受幽门螺杆菌治疗的比例较低,总体HCRU和与幽门螺杆菌相关的HCRU较低,医疗费用也较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信