Death and denial of care in Indian prisons.

Q3 Medicine
Meenakshi D'Cruz
{"title":"Death and denial of care in Indian prisons.","authors":"Meenakshi D'Cruz","doi":"10.20529/IJME.2023.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Custodial death is generally linked in the public mind with police brutality and torture, not with indirect brutality through negligence and callous treatment in jail custody. Yet it is not known how many of the thousands of prisoners who die in our jails every year die due to neglect by the jail authorities. The official Prison Statistics India (PSI) in its most recent report states that 1,879 men and women died due to \"natural causes\" in prisons across India in 2021. Natural causes are defined in the report as \"illness\" and \"ageing\". According to the report, 185 more prisoners died of \"unnatural\" causes, and 52 of \"causes not yet known\". [1: p 179]. \"Unnatural deaths\" include \"deaths due to negligence or excesses by jail personnel\"a. The vagueness of this classification in the PSI data had been noted by Justice Lokur in a landmark Supreme Court judgment, in 2013, when he said: \"The distinction made by the NCRB [National Crime Records Bureau] between natural and unnatural deaths is unclear. For example, if a prisoner dies due to a lack of proper medical attention or timely medical attention, would that be classified as a natural death or an unnatural death?\" [2].</p>","PeriodicalId":35523,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical ethics","volume":"VIII 3","pages":"175-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2023.040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Custodial death is generally linked in the public mind with police brutality and torture, not with indirect brutality through negligence and callous treatment in jail custody. Yet it is not known how many of the thousands of prisoners who die in our jails every year die due to neglect by the jail authorities. The official Prison Statistics India (PSI) in its most recent report states that 1,879 men and women died due to "natural causes" in prisons across India in 2021. Natural causes are defined in the report as "illness" and "ageing". According to the report, 185 more prisoners died of "unnatural" causes, and 52 of "causes not yet known". [1: p 179]. "Unnatural deaths" include "deaths due to negligence or excesses by jail personnel"a. The vagueness of this classification in the PSI data had been noted by Justice Lokur in a landmark Supreme Court judgment, in 2013, when he said: "The distinction made by the NCRB [National Crime Records Bureau] between natural and unnatural deaths is unclear. For example, if a prisoner dies due to a lack of proper medical attention or timely medical attention, would that be classified as a natural death or an unnatural death?" [2].

印度监狱中的死亡和拒绝护理。
在公众心目中,拘留死亡通常与警察的暴行和酷刑有关,而不是与监狱拘留中的疏忽和无情对待造成的间接暴行有关。然而,我们不知道每年在监狱中死亡的数千名囚犯中有多少人是由于监狱当局的忽视而死亡的。印度官方监狱统计局(PSI)在其最新报告中指出,2021年,印度各地监狱中有1879名男女因“自然原因”死亡。自然原因在报告中被定义为“疾病”和“衰老”。报告称,另有185名囚犯死于“非自然”原因,52人死于“未知原因”。[1:第179页]。“非自然死亡”包括“由于监狱工作人员的疏忽或过度行为造成的死亡”。洛库尔法官在2013年最高法院的一项具有里程碑意义的判决中指出,PSI数据中这一分类的模糊性,他说:“国家犯罪记录局对自然死亡和非自然死亡的区别尚不清楚。例如,如果囚犯因缺乏适当的医疗护理或及时的医疗护理而死亡,这会被归类为自然死亡还是非自然死亡?”[2]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian journal of medical ethics
Indian journal of medical ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (formerly Issues in Medical Ethics) is a platform for discussion on health care ethics with special reference to the problems of developing countries like India. It hopes to involve all cadres of, and beneficiaries from, this system, and strengthen the hands of those with ethical values and concern for the under-privileged. The journal is owned and published by the Forum for Medical Ethics Society, a not-for-profit, voluntary organisation. The FMES was born out of an effort by a group of concerned doctors to focus attention on the need for ethical norms and practices in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信