Practice change: No benefit of extended lymphadenectomy at radical cystectomy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Omar Fahmy , Maxim Kochergin , Anastasios D. Asimakopoulos , Georgios Gakis
{"title":"Practice change: No benefit of extended lymphadenectomy at radical cystectomy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer","authors":"Omar Fahmy ,&nbsp;Maxim Kochergin ,&nbsp;Anastasios D. Asimakopoulos ,&nbsp;Georgios Gakis","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>For many decades, extended pelvic lymph node dissection has been an integral part during </span>radical cystectomy<span> for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer<span>. This practice was based on large retrospective meta-analyses suggesting an oncologic benefit to an extended dissection. This mini review and meta-analysis includes the two available randomized trials in the current literature. Therefore, it can be considered as the strongest level of evidence regarding the prognostic benefit of an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Based on current randomized data, standard pelvic lymph node dissection up to the level of iliac bifurcation is sufficient, and extension of the dissection above this level does not provide any additional oncologic benefit.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":"50 3","pages":"Pages 102-104"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775423000647","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For many decades, extended pelvic lymph node dissection has been an integral part during radical cystectomy for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. This practice was based on large retrospective meta-analyses suggesting an oncologic benefit to an extended dissection. This mini review and meta-analysis includes the two available randomized trials in the current literature. Therefore, it can be considered as the strongest level of evidence regarding the prognostic benefit of an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Based on current randomized data, standard pelvic lymph node dissection up to the level of iliac bifurcation is sufficient, and extension of the dissection above this level does not provide any additional oncologic benefit.

实践改变:在肌浸润性膀胱癌症患者中,扩大淋巴结切除术在根治性膀胱切除术中没有益处。
几十年来,对于肌侵犯性膀胱癌症患者,扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫一直是根治性膀胱切除术中不可或缺的一部分。这种做法是基于大型回顾性荟萃分析,表明扩大解剖对肿瘤学有益。这篇小型综述和荟萃分析包括了当前文献中可用的两项随机试验。因此,它可以被认为是关于扩大盆腔淋巴结切除术预后益处的最强证据。根据目前的随机数据,标准的盆腔淋巴结清扫达到髂分叉水平就足够了,并且将清扫范围扩大到该水平以上并不能提供任何额外的肿瘤学益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信