A framework for lean implementation in preoperative assessment: Evidence from a high complexity hospital in Italy.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Services Management Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-23 DOI:10.1177/09514848231194853
Giulia Goretti, Martina Pisarra, Maria Rosaria Capogreco, Patrizia Meroni
{"title":"A framework for lean implementation in preoperative assessment: Evidence from a high complexity hospital in Italy.","authors":"Giulia Goretti, Martina Pisarra, Maria Rosaria Capogreco, Patrizia Meroni","doi":"10.1177/09514848231194853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> A routine preoperative assessment is considered both ineffective and inefficient. Despite the widespread application of lean thinking in healthcare, there is little evidence of successful experiences in preoperative admissions in order to reduce \"No value added\" activities. A conceptual framework reporting the drivers (clinic, tools, innovation, organization, and governance) and impacts (patient, efficiency, sustainability, time, learning and growth) was developed. <b>Methodology:</b> Drawing on the experience of an Italian high complexity hospital, this paper analyzes the case study by reporting evidence on how to implement lean in preoperative assessment and how to evaluate the positive results obtained. <b>Results:</b> Applying lean principles, the identification of value improved the appropriateness of care by creating 40 personalized pathways; the value stream resulted in a reduction of \"No Value Added Time\" from 37% to 28%, chest X-rays from 41% to 14% and cardiac visits from 49% to 37%; the pursuit of continuous flow through innovation contributed to increase the use of digitalization; the new pull organization helped to reduce the average time spent per year by 1.5 h; the continuous improvement was ensured through the governance of results. <b>Conclusion:</b> The proposed framework should be used to improve the quality of care in preoperative admissions by adopting the lean drivers for successful implementation and reporting the impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45801,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Management Research","volume":" ","pages":"236-244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848231194853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A routine preoperative assessment is considered both ineffective and inefficient. Despite the widespread application of lean thinking in healthcare, there is little evidence of successful experiences in preoperative admissions in order to reduce "No value added" activities. A conceptual framework reporting the drivers (clinic, tools, innovation, organization, and governance) and impacts (patient, efficiency, sustainability, time, learning and growth) was developed. Methodology: Drawing on the experience of an Italian high complexity hospital, this paper analyzes the case study by reporting evidence on how to implement lean in preoperative assessment and how to evaluate the positive results obtained. Results: Applying lean principles, the identification of value improved the appropriateness of care by creating 40 personalized pathways; the value stream resulted in a reduction of "No Value Added Time" from 37% to 28%, chest X-rays from 41% to 14% and cardiac visits from 49% to 37%; the pursuit of continuous flow through innovation contributed to increase the use of digitalization; the new pull organization helped to reduce the average time spent per year by 1.5 h; the continuous improvement was ensured through the governance of results. Conclusion: The proposed framework should be used to improve the quality of care in preoperative admissions by adopting the lean drivers for successful implementation and reporting the impacts.

术前评估中的精益实施框架:来自意大利一家高复杂性医院的证据。
目的:常规术前评估被认为既无效又低效。尽管精益思想在医疗保健领域得到了广泛应用,但很少有证据表明术前入院可减少 "无附加值 "活动的成功经验。我们制定了一个概念框架,报告了驱动因素(诊所、工具、创新、组织和管理)和影响(患者、效率、可持续性、时间、学习和成长)。方法:本文借鉴了一家意大利高复杂性医院的经验,通过报告如何在术前评估中实施精益化以及如何评估所取得的积极成果的证据,对案例研究进行了分析。结果:应用精益原则,价值识别通过创建 40 个个性化路径提高了护理的适当性;价值流导致 "无增值时间 "从 37% 减少到 28%,胸部 X 射线从 41% 减少到 14%,心脏就诊从 49% 减少到 37%;通过创新追求持续流动有助于增加数字化的使用;新的拉动式组织有助于将每年平均花费的时间减少 1.5 小时;通过结果管理确保持续改进。结论:应采用所提出的框架来提高术前入院的护理质量,采用精益驱动因素来成功实施并报告其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Management Research
Health Services Management Research HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Health Services Management Research (HSMR) is an authoritative international peer-reviewed journal which publishes theoretically and empirically rigorous research on questions of enduring interest to health-care organizations and systems throughout the world. Examining the real issues confronting health services management, it provides an independent view and cutting edge evidence-based research to guide policy-making and management decision-making. HSMR aims to be a forum serving an international community of academics and researchers on the one hand and healthcare managers, executives, policymakers and clinicians and all health professionals on the other. HSMR wants to make a substantial contribution to both research and managerial practice, with particular emphasis placed on publishing studies which offer actionable findings and on promoting knowledge mobilisation toward theoretical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信