Medical ethics teaching in the new undergraduate physiology competency-based curriculum in medical institutions in Delhi: A pilot, feasibility study.

Q3 Medicine
Indian journal of medical ethics Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-24 DOI:10.20529/IJME.2023.018
Satendra Singh, Manish Solanki, Neelam Vaney, Anant Bhan
{"title":"Medical ethics teaching in the new undergraduate physiology competency-based curriculum in medical institutions in Delhi: A pilot, feasibility study.","authors":"Satendra Singh,&nbsp;Manish Solanki,&nbsp;Neelam Vaney,&nbsp;Anant Bhan","doi":"10.20529/IJME.2023.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical ethics teaching has received little attention in India's undergraduate medical curriculum, so the National Medical Commission's formal inclusion of medical ethics in the new competency-based curriculum (CBME) is creditable. However, the policymakers have left out the most crucial stakeholders - the teachers. This study was conducted to find out how physiology educators in Delhi felt about the implementation of ethics teaching in physiology in the CBME.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pilot, cross-sectional, observational, feasibility study conducted using a questionnaire, involving faculty and senior residents (post-MD) in the departments of Physiology at nine medical colleges in Delhi, conducted over the period from February to October 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 76% (60/79), of which 40% (24/60) were senior residents and 60% (36/60) were faculty. Around 55% (n=33) felt bioethics and clinical ethics are not synonymous; 53% (n=32) believed ethics education can be accomplished in a large group setting; 75% (n=45) believed it should be the responsibility of the physiology faculty, rather than the clinical faculty, and 61.7% (n=37) wanted it to be included in the formative assessment. The respondents shared ethical concerns that should be included in the physiology curriculum and the best candidates to teach them to achieve integration. Despite the challenges, the majority 65% (n=39) felt ethics in the physiology CBME should be an inseparable part of teaching in all instructional modalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early clinical exposure was considered preferable to the Attitude, Ethics, and Communication (AETCOM) programme. Using the five W's and one H method, we talk about how our findings can be used as a road map to help physiologists teach ethics to medical students in the new CBME.</p>","PeriodicalId":35523,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical ethics","volume":"VIII 3","pages":"209-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2023.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical ethics teaching has received little attention in India's undergraduate medical curriculum, so the National Medical Commission's formal inclusion of medical ethics in the new competency-based curriculum (CBME) is creditable. However, the policymakers have left out the most crucial stakeholders - the teachers. This study was conducted to find out how physiology educators in Delhi felt about the implementation of ethics teaching in physiology in the CBME.

Methods: This was a pilot, cross-sectional, observational, feasibility study conducted using a questionnaire, involving faculty and senior residents (post-MD) in the departments of Physiology at nine medical colleges in Delhi, conducted over the period from February to October 2020.

Results: The response rate was 76% (60/79), of which 40% (24/60) were senior residents and 60% (36/60) were faculty. Around 55% (n=33) felt bioethics and clinical ethics are not synonymous; 53% (n=32) believed ethics education can be accomplished in a large group setting; 75% (n=45) believed it should be the responsibility of the physiology faculty, rather than the clinical faculty, and 61.7% (n=37) wanted it to be included in the formative assessment. The respondents shared ethical concerns that should be included in the physiology curriculum and the best candidates to teach them to achieve integration. Despite the challenges, the majority 65% (n=39) felt ethics in the physiology CBME should be an inseparable part of teaching in all instructional modalities.

Conclusion: Early clinical exposure was considered preferable to the Attitude, Ethics, and Communication (AETCOM) programme. Using the five W's and one H method, we talk about how our findings can be used as a road map to help physiologists teach ethics to medical students in the new CBME.

德里医疗机构新的本科生生理能力课程中的医学伦理学教学:一项试点、可行性研究。
背景:医学伦理学教学在印度的本科医学课程中很少受到关注,因此国家医学委员会将医学伦理学正式纳入新的基于能力的课程(CBME)是值得称赞的。然而,政策制定者忽略了最关键的利益相关者——教师。本研究旨在了解德里的生理学教育工作者对CBME实施生理学伦理教学的感受,结果:应答率为76%(60/79),其中40%(24/60)为老年居民,60%(36/60)为教员。大约55%(n=33)的人认为生物伦理和临床伦理不是同义词;53%(n=32)的人认为道德教育可以在大的群体环境中完成;75%(n=45)的人认为这应该是生理学系的责任,而不是临床系的责任;61.7%(n=37)的人希望将其纳入形成性评估。受访者分享了生理学课程中应包含的伦理问题,以及教他们实现融合的最佳人选。尽管存在挑战,但大多数65%(n=39)的人认为生理学CBME中的伦理应该是所有教学模式中教学不可分割的一部分。结论:早期临床接触被认为比态度、道德和沟通(AETCOM)计划更可取。使用五个W和一个H的方法,我们讨论了如何将我们的发现作为路线图,帮助生理学家在新的CBME中向医学生教授伦理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian journal of medical ethics
Indian journal of medical ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (formerly Issues in Medical Ethics) is a platform for discussion on health care ethics with special reference to the problems of developing countries like India. It hopes to involve all cadres of, and beneficiaries from, this system, and strengthen the hands of those with ethical values and concern for the under-privileged. The journal is owned and published by the Forum for Medical Ethics Society, a not-for-profit, voluntary organisation. The FMES was born out of an effort by a group of concerned doctors to focus attention on the need for ethical norms and practices in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信