What is the contemporary role of second-generation philosophical bioethicists?

Q3 Medicine
Akira Akabayashi, Eisuke Nakazawa
{"title":"What is the contemporary role of second-generation philosophical bioethicists?","authors":"Akira Akabayashi,&nbsp;Eisuke Nakazawa","doi":"10.20529/IJME.2022.069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bioethics originated in the 1970s and has now been around for half a century. During that half-century, brilliant achievements have been made, especially in the West. Basic bioethics theories have been developed that have proved useful in solving many bioethical issues including policies. Moreover, ethics committees and clinical ethics consultations have been implemented in the medical field. However, there seems to be a pessimistic discourse in bioethics in developed countries. For example, mid-career researchers from the world's leading bioethics centres in the UK and North America, Blumenthal-Barby et al, expressed concern and frustration about the current situation of philosophy in bioethics in their 2021 paper \"The Place of Philosophy in Bioethics Today\" [1]. The authors pessimistically say that.</p>","PeriodicalId":35523,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical ethics","volume":"VIII 3","pages":"252-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2022.069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bioethics originated in the 1970s and has now been around for half a century. During that half-century, brilliant achievements have been made, especially in the West. Basic bioethics theories have been developed that have proved useful in solving many bioethical issues including policies. Moreover, ethics committees and clinical ethics consultations have been implemented in the medical field. However, there seems to be a pessimistic discourse in bioethics in developed countries. For example, mid-career researchers from the world's leading bioethics centres in the UK and North America, Blumenthal-Barby et al, expressed concern and frustration about the current situation of philosophy in bioethics in their 2021 paper "The Place of Philosophy in Bioethics Today" [1]. The authors pessimistically say that.

第二代哲学生命伦理学家的当代角色是什么?
生命伦理学起源于20世纪70年代,至今已有半个世纪的历史。在这半个世纪里,取得了辉煌的成就,特别是在西方。基本的生物伦理学理论已经发展起来,在解决包括政策在内的许多生物伦理学问题方面被证明是有用的。此外,医学领域还设立了伦理委员会和临床伦理咨询机构。然而,在发达国家,似乎存在着一种悲观的话语。例如,来自英国和北美世界领先的生命伦理学中心的职业中期研究人员Blumenthal-Barby等人在其2021年的论文“the Place of philosophy in bioethics Today”中表达了对哲学在生命伦理学中的现状的担忧和沮丧[1]。作者悲观地说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian journal of medical ethics
Indian journal of medical ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (formerly Issues in Medical Ethics) is a platform for discussion on health care ethics with special reference to the problems of developing countries like India. It hopes to involve all cadres of, and beneficiaries from, this system, and strengthen the hands of those with ethical values and concern for the under-privileged. The journal is owned and published by the Forum for Medical Ethics Society, a not-for-profit, voluntary organisation. The FMES was born out of an effort by a group of concerned doctors to focus attention on the need for ethical norms and practices in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信