In-Hospital Versus Out-of-Hospital Stroke Onset Comparison of Process Metrics in a Community Primary Stroke Center

Felix E. Chukwudelunzu MD, MBA , Bart Demaerschalk MD, MSc , Leonardo Fugoso MD , Emeka Amadi MBBS, MD , Donn Dexter MD , Angela Gullicksrud RN , Clinton Hagen MS
{"title":"In-Hospital Versus Out-of-Hospital Stroke Onset Comparison of Process Metrics in a Community Primary Stroke Center","authors":"Felix E. Chukwudelunzu MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Bart Demaerschalk MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Leonardo Fugoso MD ,&nbsp;Emeka Amadi MBBS, MD ,&nbsp;Donn Dexter MD ,&nbsp;Angela Gullicksrud RN ,&nbsp;Clinton Hagen MS","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine in-hospital stroke onset metrics and outcomes, quality of care, and mortality compared with out-of-hospital stroke in a single community-based primary stroke center.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Medical records of in-hospital stroke onset were compared with out-of-hospital stroke onset alert data between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019. Time-sensitive stroke process metric data were collected for each incident stroke alert. The primary focus of interest was the time-sensitive stroke quality metrics. Secondary focus pertained to thrombolysis treatment or complications, and mortality. Descriptive and univariable statistical analyses were applied. Kruskal-Wallis and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used to compare median values and categorical data between prespecified groups. The statistical significance was set at α=0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The out-of-hospital group reported a more favorable response to time-sensitive stroke process metrics than the in-hospital group, as measured by median stroke team response time (15.0 vs 26.0 minutes; <em>P</em>≤.0001) and median head computed tomography scan completion time (12.0 vs 41.0 minutes; <em>P</em>=.0001). There was no difference in the stroke alert time between the 2 groups (14.0 vs 8.0 minutes; <em>P</em>=.089). Longer hospital length of stay (4 vs 3 days; <em>P</em>=.004) and increased hospital mortality (19.3% vs 7.4%; <em>P</em>=.0032) were observed for the in-hospital group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The key findings in this study were that time-sensitive stroke process metrics and stroke outcome measures were superior for the out-of-hospital groups compared with the in-hospital groups. Focusing on improving time-sensitive stroke process metrics may improve outcomes in the in-hospital stroke cohort.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/2c/main.PMC10504462.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine in-hospital stroke onset metrics and outcomes, quality of care, and mortality compared with out-of-hospital stroke in a single community-based primary stroke center.

Patients and Methods

Medical records of in-hospital stroke onset were compared with out-of-hospital stroke onset alert data between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019. Time-sensitive stroke process metric data were collected for each incident stroke alert. The primary focus of interest was the time-sensitive stroke quality metrics. Secondary focus pertained to thrombolysis treatment or complications, and mortality. Descriptive and univariable statistical analyses were applied. Kruskal-Wallis and χ2 tests were used to compare median values and categorical data between prespecified groups. The statistical significance was set at α=0.05.

Results

The out-of-hospital group reported a more favorable response to time-sensitive stroke process metrics than the in-hospital group, as measured by median stroke team response time (15.0 vs 26.0 minutes; P≤.0001) and median head computed tomography scan completion time (12.0 vs 41.0 minutes; P=.0001). There was no difference in the stroke alert time between the 2 groups (14.0 vs 8.0 minutes; P=.089). Longer hospital length of stay (4 vs 3 days; P=.004) and increased hospital mortality (19.3% vs 7.4%; P=.0032) were observed for the in-hospital group.

Conclusions

The key findings in this study were that time-sensitive stroke process metrics and stroke outcome measures were superior for the out-of-hospital groups compared with the in-hospital groups. Focusing on improving time-sensitive stroke process metrics may improve outcomes in the in-hospital stroke cohort.

Abstract Image

社区原发性卒中中心过程指标的院内与院外卒中发病比较。
目的:在一个基于社区的原发性卒中中心,与院外卒中相比,检查院内卒中发病指标和结果、护理质量和死亡率。患者和方法:将2013年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间住院中风发作的医疗记录与院外中风发作警报数据进行比较。收集每个事件中风警报的时间敏感的中风过程度量数据。感兴趣的主要焦点是时间敏感的笔划质量指标。次要关注点与溶栓治疗或并发症和死亡率有关。采用描述性和单变量统计分析。Kruskal-Wallis和χ2检验用于比较预先指定组之间的中值和分类数据。结果:院外组对时间敏感的卒中过程指标的反应比院内组更有利,通过中位卒中团队反应时间(15.0 vs 26.0分钟;P≤.0001)和中位头部计算机断层扫描完成时间(12.0 vs 41.0分钟;P=0.001)测量。两组之间的卒中警报时间没有差异(14.0 vs 8.0分钟;P=0.089)。观察到住院时间更长(4 vs 3天;P=0.004)和住院死亡率增加(19.3%vs 7.4%;P=0.032)为住院组。结论:本研究的关键发现是,与住院组相比,院外组的时间敏感性卒中过程指标和卒中结果指标更优越。专注于改善对时间敏感的中风过程指标可能会改善住院中风队列的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信