Staff perceptions of barriers to self-harm care in the emergency department: A cross-sectional survey study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hannah Richards , Gowri Rajaram , Michelle Lamblin , Jonathan Knott , Owen Connolly , Sarah Hetrick , Jo Robinson
{"title":"Staff perceptions of barriers to self-harm care in the emergency department: A cross-sectional survey study","authors":"Hannah Richards ,&nbsp;Gowri Rajaram ,&nbsp;Michelle Lamblin ,&nbsp;Jonathan Knott ,&nbsp;Owen Connolly ,&nbsp;Sarah Hetrick ,&nbsp;Jo Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emergency departments (EDs) are often the first point of contact for people with self-harm; however, they do not always receive optimal care. The study objective was to examine the perspectives of ED staff who respond to self-harm presentations, perceived barriers to providing optimal, guideline-concordant care, and staff’s familiarity with existing guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An online cross-sectional survey comprising purpose-designed questions concerning self-harm in the ED was completed by 131 staff (83.2% nurses) from two hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Survey results were analysed using Stata version 16 and frequencies and percentages were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Respondents reported knowledge of how to appropriately manage a person presenting with self-harm. However, lack of space (62.3%) and time (78.7%) to conduct the appropriate assessments, lack of self-harm training (71.8%), and limited awareness of or access to guidelines and recommendations for self-harm management within the ED (63.6%), were identified as primary barriers to their ability to appropriately manage these presenters.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Improvements to the ED environment and processes, as well as the provision of regular self-harm specific education and training for all ED staff are needed. Implementation of best-practice standards should prioritise guideline-concordant care, with a particular focus on the education needs of nursing staff.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X23000489/pdfft?md5=542a252986e47d3b0758c48f21e81054&pid=1-s2.0-S2588994X23000489-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X23000489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Emergency departments (EDs) are often the first point of contact for people with self-harm; however, they do not always receive optimal care. The study objective was to examine the perspectives of ED staff who respond to self-harm presentations, perceived barriers to providing optimal, guideline-concordant care, and staff’s familiarity with existing guidelines.

Methods

An online cross-sectional survey comprising purpose-designed questions concerning self-harm in the ED was completed by 131 staff (83.2% nurses) from two hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Survey results were analysed using Stata version 16 and frequencies and percentages were calculated.

Results

Respondents reported knowledge of how to appropriately manage a person presenting with self-harm. However, lack of space (62.3%) and time (78.7%) to conduct the appropriate assessments, lack of self-harm training (71.8%), and limited awareness of or access to guidelines and recommendations for self-harm management within the ED (63.6%), were identified as primary barriers to their ability to appropriately manage these presenters.

Conclusions

Improvements to the ED environment and processes, as well as the provision of regular self-harm specific education and training for all ED staff are needed. Implementation of best-practice standards should prioritise guideline-concordant care, with a particular focus on the education needs of nursing staff.

急诊科工作人员对自我伤害护理障碍的看法:横断面调查研究
背景急诊科(ED)通常是自残者的第一接触点;然而,他们并不总能得到最佳护理。本研究旨在探讨急诊科工作人员在应对自残患者时所持的观点、在提供与指南相一致的最佳护理时所遇到的障碍,以及工作人员对现有指南的熟悉程度。方法来自澳大利亚维多利亚州两家医院的 131 名工作人员(83.2% 为护士)完成了一项在线横断面调查,调查内容包括专门设计的有关急诊科自残患者的问题。调查结果受访者表示了解如何妥善处理出现自我伤害的患者。然而,缺乏进行适当评估的空间(62.3%)和时间(78.7%)、缺乏自残方面的培训(71.8%)以及对急诊室内自残管理指南和建议的了解或获取途径有限(63.6%)被认为是影响他们适当管理这些患者的主要障碍。最佳实践标准的实施应优先考虑与指南相一致的护理,并特别关注护理人员的教育需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信