Exception points for liver transplantation: A Canadian review.

Stephen E Congly, Vladimir Marquez, Rahima A Bhanji, Mamatha Bhat, Philip Wong, Geneviève Huard, Julie H Zhu, Mayur Brahmania
{"title":"Exception points for liver transplantation: A Canadian review.","authors":"Stephen E Congly,&nbsp;Vladimir Marquez,&nbsp;Rahima A Bhanji,&nbsp;Mamatha Bhat,&nbsp;Philip Wong,&nbsp;Geneviève Huard,&nbsp;Julie H Zhu,&nbsp;Mayur Brahmania","doi":"10.3138/canlivj-2022-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exception points for liver transplant (LT) allocation are used to account for mortality risk not reflected by scoring systems such as the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease with sodium (MELD-Na). Currently, there is no formal policy regarding exception points in Canada, and differences across the country are not well understood. As such, a review of the criteria and exception points granted throughout the country for LT was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven LT centres in five provinces were surveyed (Vancouver, Edmonton, London, Toronto, Montréal, Halifax) regarding the indications and criteria for exception points granted, the number of points granted, how points would be accrued, and the maximum points granted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Programs in British Columbia and Nova Scotia grant variable exception points based on the median MELD-Na score with modifications; Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec grant exception points using specific values based on the indication. Overall, there was significant heterogeneity regarding exception points granted nationally with agreement only for awarding exception points for hepatopulmonary syndrome and polycystic liver disease. The second most common agreed-upon indications for exception points were portopulmonary hypertension and recurrent cholangitis offered by four provinces. Quebec had the most formal criteria for non-cirrhosis-based conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is substantial variance across the country regarding the indications for granting exception points as well as the number of points granted. Future work on developing a national consensus will be important for the development of equity in LT across Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":9527,"journal":{"name":"Canadian liver journal","volume":"6 2","pages":"201-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370721/pdf/canlivj-2022-0026.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian liver journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/canlivj-2022-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exception points for liver transplant (LT) allocation are used to account for mortality risk not reflected by scoring systems such as the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease with sodium (MELD-Na). Currently, there is no formal policy regarding exception points in Canada, and differences across the country are not well understood. As such, a review of the criteria and exception points granted throughout the country for LT was conducted.

Methods: Seven LT centres in five provinces were surveyed (Vancouver, Edmonton, London, Toronto, Montréal, Halifax) regarding the indications and criteria for exception points granted, the number of points granted, how points would be accrued, and the maximum points granted.

Results: Programs in British Columbia and Nova Scotia grant variable exception points based on the median MELD-Na score with modifications; Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec grant exception points using specific values based on the indication. Overall, there was significant heterogeneity regarding exception points granted nationally with agreement only for awarding exception points for hepatopulmonary syndrome and polycystic liver disease. The second most common agreed-upon indications for exception points were portopulmonary hypertension and recurrent cholangitis offered by four provinces. Quebec had the most formal criteria for non-cirrhosis-based conditions.

Conclusions: There is substantial variance across the country regarding the indications for granting exception points as well as the number of points granted. Future work on developing a national consensus will be important for the development of equity in LT across Canada.

肝移植的例外点:加拿大综述。
背景:肝移植(LT)分配的例外点用于解释未被评分系统反映的死亡风险,如终末期肝病钠治疗模型(MELD-Na)。目前,加拿大没有关于例外点的正式政策,全国各地的差异也不太清楚。因此,对在全国范围内授予LT的标准和例外点进行了审查。方法:调查了五个省的七个LT中心(温哥华,埃德蒙顿,伦敦,多伦多,蒙特里萨,哈利法克斯)关于授予例外积分的适应症和标准,授予的积分数量,积分如何累积,以及授予的最高积分。结果:不列颠哥伦比亚省和新斯科舍省的项目根据MELD-Na中位数评分给予可变例外点,并进行修改;艾伯塔省、安大略省和魁北克省根据适应症使用特定值授予例外点。总体而言,在全国范围内授予的例外积分存在显著的异质性,只有在授予肝肺综合征和多囊性肝病的例外积分方面存在一致性。第二个最常见的商定的适应症的例外点是门脉性高血压和复发性胆管炎由四个省提供。魁北克省对非肝硬化疾病有最正式的标准。结论:在全国范围内,关于给予例外积分的适应症以及给予的积分数量存在很大差异。未来在全国范围内达成共识的工作将对加拿大LT的公平发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信