Resting state EEG as biomarker of cognitive training and physical activity's joint effect in Parkinson's patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Carlos Trenado, Paula Trauberg, Saskia Elben, Karina Dimenshteyn, Ann-Kristin Folkerts, Karsten Witt, Daniel Weiss, Inga Liepelt-Scarfone, Elke Kalbe, Lars Wojtecki
{"title":"Resting state EEG as biomarker of cognitive training and physical activity's joint effect in Parkinson's patients with mild cognitive impairment.","authors":"Carlos Trenado, Paula Trauberg, Saskia Elben, Karina Dimenshteyn, Ann-Kristin Folkerts, Karsten Witt, Daniel Weiss, Inga Liepelt-Scarfone, Elke Kalbe, Lars Wojtecki","doi":"10.1186/s42466-023-00273-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive decline is a major factor for the deterioration of the quality of life in patients suffering from Parkinson's disease (PD). Recently, it was reported that cognitive training (CT) in PD patients with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) led to an increase of physical activity (PA) accompanied by improved executive function (EF). Moreover, PA has been shown to alter positively brain function and cognitive abilities in PD. Both observations suggest an interaction between CT and PA.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A previous multicenter (MC) study was slightly significant when considering independent effects of interventions (CT and PA) on EF. Here, we use MC constituent single center data that showed no effect of interventions on EF. Thus, this exploratory study considers pooling data from both interventions to gain insight into a recently reported interaction between CT and PA and provide a proof of principle for the usefulness of resting state EEG as a neurophysiological biomarker of joint intervention's effect on EF and attention in PD-MCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre- and post-intervention resting state EEG and neuropsychological scores (EF and attention) were obtained from 19 PD-MCI patients (10 (CT) and 9 (PA)). We focused our EEG analysis on frontal cortical areas due to their relevance on cognitive function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a significant joint effect of interventions on EF and a trend on attention, as well as trends for the negative correlation between attention and theta power (pre), the positive correlation between EF and alpha power (post) and a significant negative relationship between attention and theta power over time (post-pre).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results support the role of theta and alpha power at frontal areas as a biomarker for the therapeutic joint effect of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19169,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research and Practice","volume":"5 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-023-00273-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive decline is a major factor for the deterioration of the quality of life in patients suffering from Parkinson's disease (PD). Recently, it was reported that cognitive training (CT) in PD patients with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) led to an increase of physical activity (PA) accompanied by improved executive function (EF). Moreover, PA has been shown to alter positively brain function and cognitive abilities in PD. Both observations suggest an interaction between CT and PA.

Objectives: A previous multicenter (MC) study was slightly significant when considering independent effects of interventions (CT and PA) on EF. Here, we use MC constituent single center data that showed no effect of interventions on EF. Thus, this exploratory study considers pooling data from both interventions to gain insight into a recently reported interaction between CT and PA and provide a proof of principle for the usefulness of resting state EEG as a neurophysiological biomarker of joint intervention's effect on EF and attention in PD-MCI.

Methods: Pre- and post-intervention resting state EEG and neuropsychological scores (EF and attention) were obtained from 19 PD-MCI patients (10 (CT) and 9 (PA)). We focused our EEG analysis on frontal cortical areas due to their relevance on cognitive function.

Results: We found a significant joint effect of interventions on EF and a trend on attention, as well as trends for the negative correlation between attention and theta power (pre), the positive correlation between EF and alpha power (post) and a significant negative relationship between attention and theta power over time (post-pre).

Conclusions: Our results support the role of theta and alpha power at frontal areas as a biomarker for the therapeutic joint effect of interventions.

Abstract Image

静息状态脑电图作为轻度认知障碍帕金森病患者认知训练和体力活动联合效应的生物标志物
背景:认知能力下降是帕金森病(PD)患者生活质量恶化的主要因素。最近有报道称,认知训练(CT)对轻度认知障碍(PD- mci)的PD患者可导致身体活动(PA)的增加,并伴有执行功能(EF)的改善。此外,PA已被证明对PD患者的脑功能和认知能力有积极的改变。这两个观察结果都表明CT和PA之间存在相互作用。目的:先前的一项多中心(MC)研究在考虑干预措施(CT和PA)对EF的独立影响时略有显著性。在这里,我们使用MC组成单中心数据,显示干预对EF没有影响。因此,本探索性研究考虑汇集两种干预措施的数据,以深入了解最近报道的CT和PA之间的相互作用,并为静息状态脑电图作为联合干预对PD-MCI患者EF和注意力影响的神经生理生物标志物的有效性提供原理证明。方法:对19例PD-MCI患者(CT组10例,PA组9例)进行干预前和干预后静息状态脑电图(EEG)和神经心理评分(EF和注意力)。由于额叶皮质区域与认知功能相关,我们将EEG分析重点放在额叶皮质区域。结果:干预对EF的影响与对注意力的影响呈显著的联合效应,并且随着时间的推移,注意与θ功率(前)呈负相关,EF与α功率(后)呈正相关,注意与θ功率呈显著的负相关(后-前)。结论:我们的研究结果支持额叶区域的θ和α能量作为干预治疗联合效果的生物标志物的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信