[Practice of pharmaceutical thrombosis prophylaxis and anticoagulation in patients with sepsis and pre-existing anticoagulation or heparin-induced type II thrombocytopenia-Results of a nationwide survey in German intensive care units].

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Thomas Schmoch, Thorsten Brenner, Andrea Becker-Pennrich, Ludwig Christian Hinske, Markus A Weigand, Josef Briegel, Patrick Möhnle
{"title":"[Practice of pharmaceutical thrombosis prophylaxis and anticoagulation in patients with sepsis and pre-existing anticoagulation or heparin-induced type II thrombocytopenia-Results of a nationwide survey in German intensive care units].","authors":"Thomas Schmoch,&nbsp;Thorsten Brenner,&nbsp;Andrea Becker-Pennrich,&nbsp;Ludwig Christian Hinske,&nbsp;Markus A Weigand,&nbsp;Josef Briegel,&nbsp;Patrick Möhnle","doi":"10.1007/s00101-021-01011-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A pre-existing anticoagulation treatment and predisposing diseases for thromboembolic events represent common problems in patients with sepsis or septic shock; however, these conditions are not addressed in current national guidelines for sepsis and septic shock. One of the aims of this nationwide survey in Germany was therefore to determine how intensive care physicians deal with these problems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2019 to May 2020, we conducted a nationwide survey among German medical directors of intensive care units (ICU) addressing anticoagulation and drug-based prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with sepsis and sepsis-induced coagulopathy. One focus was the procedure for patients with a pre-existing anticoagulation treatment or a previously known heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type 2 (acute symptomatic vs. dating back years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In most of the participating ICUs pre-existing anticoagulation is largely continued with low molecular weight heparin preparations or unfractionated heparin. In patients with pre-existing HIT type 2 both acute symptomatic and dating back years, argatroban represents the drug of choice. There is a high degree of variability in the definition of the target values, usually being well above the range for pure VTE prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data on the continuation of anticoagulation beyond VTE prophylaxis with a subsequently increased risk of bleeding in patients with sepsis and septic shock is limited and treatment decisions are in many cases subject to individual consideration by the practitioner. The results of our survey imply the need for a systematic work-up of this topic in order to support daily practice in many ICUs with the required evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50796,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesist","volume":"71 3","pages":"193-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00101-021-01011-9","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-01011-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: A pre-existing anticoagulation treatment and predisposing diseases for thromboembolic events represent common problems in patients with sepsis or septic shock; however, these conditions are not addressed in current national guidelines for sepsis and septic shock. One of the aims of this nationwide survey in Germany was therefore to determine how intensive care physicians deal with these problems.

Methods: From October 2019 to May 2020, we conducted a nationwide survey among German medical directors of intensive care units (ICU) addressing anticoagulation and drug-based prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with sepsis and sepsis-induced coagulopathy. One focus was the procedure for patients with a pre-existing anticoagulation treatment or a previously known heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type 2 (acute symptomatic vs. dating back years).

Results: In most of the participating ICUs pre-existing anticoagulation is largely continued with low molecular weight heparin preparations or unfractionated heparin. In patients with pre-existing HIT type 2 both acute symptomatic and dating back years, argatroban represents the drug of choice. There is a high degree of variability in the definition of the target values, usually being well above the range for pure VTE prophylaxis.

Conclusion: Data on the continuation of anticoagulation beyond VTE prophylaxis with a subsequently increased risk of bleeding in patients with sepsis and septic shock is limited and treatment decisions are in many cases subject to individual consideration by the practitioner. The results of our survey imply the need for a systematic work-up of this topic in order to support daily practice in many ICUs with the required evidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

[药物血栓预防和抗凝治疗脓毒症和既往抗凝或肝素诱导的II型血小板减少患者的实践-德国重症监护病房全国调查的结果]。
背景:预先存在的抗凝治疗和血栓栓塞事件的易感疾病是败血症或感染性休克患者的常见问题;然而,在目前的国家败血症和感染性休克指南中没有提到这些情况。因此,这项在德国进行的全国性调查的目的之一是确定重症监护医生如何处理这些问题。方法:2019年10月至2020年5月,我们对德国重症监护病房(ICU)的医疗主任进行了一项全国性调查,调查内容涉及败血症和败血症诱导凝血病患者静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的抗凝和药物预防。其中一个重点是预先接受过抗凝治疗或先前已知的肝素诱导的2型血小板减少症(急性症状vs追溯到几年前)患者的治疗程序。结果:在大多数参与的icu中,已有的抗凝主要继续使用低分子量肝素制剂或未分离肝素。对于已有HIT的2型患者,无论是急性症状还是多年前,阿加曲班都是首选药物。目标值的定义有很大的可变性,通常远高于纯静脉血栓栓塞预防的范围。结论:对于脓毒症和感染性休克患者,在静脉血栓栓塞预防之外继续抗凝治疗并随后增加出血风险的数据是有限的,在许多情况下,治疗决定取决于医生的个人考虑。我们的调查结果表明,需要对这一主题进行系统的研究,以便为许多icu的日常实践提供所需的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesist
Anaesthesist 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Anaesthesist is an internationally recognized journal de­aling with all aspects of anaesthesia and intensive medicine up to pain therapy. Der Anaesthesist addresses all specialists and scientists particularly interested in anaesthesiology and it is neighbouring areas. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics reflecting the multidisciplinary environment including pharmacotherapy, intensive medicine, emergency medicine, regional anaesthetics, pain therapy and medical law. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of relevant clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信