Post-Marketing Safety Study of Ramucirumab Plus FOLFIRI: Analysis of Age and Initial Dose of Irinotecan in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drugs - Real World Outcomes Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-27 DOI:10.1007/s40801-023-00366-2
Toshiki Masuishi, Soshi Nagaoka, Long Jin, Kenichi Yoshizawa
{"title":"Post-Marketing Safety Study of Ramucirumab Plus FOLFIRI: Analysis of Age and Initial Dose of Irinotecan in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Toshiki Masuishi,&nbsp;Soshi Nagaoka,&nbsp;Long Jin,&nbsp;Kenichi Yoshizawa","doi":"10.1007/s40801-023-00366-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited real-world evidence regarding the safety of ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the safety of ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with mCRC by age and initial dose of irinotecan.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This single-arm, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, observational study was conducted between December 2016 and April 2020. Patients were observed for 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 366 enrolled Japanese patients, 362 were eligible for study inclusion. The frequency of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) by age (≥ 75 years vs < 75 years) was 56.1% versus 50.2%, indicating no substantial differences between age groups. Grade ≥ 3 notable AEs, including neutropenia, proteinuria, and hypertension, were also similar in both age groups, but the frequency of any grade venous thromboembolic events was higher in those aged ≥ 75 years than in those aged < 75 years (7.0% vs 1.3%). The frequency of grade ≥ 3 AEs was slightly lower in patients receiving > 150 mg/m<sup>2</sup> of irinotecan than in those receiving ≤ 150 mg/m<sup>2</sup> of irinotecan (42.1% vs 53.6%); however, the frequency of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea, but not any grade diarrhea, and liver failure/injury was higher in patients receiving > 150 mg/m<sup>2</sup> of irinotecan than in those receiving ≤ 150 mg/m<sup>2</sup> of irinotecan (4.6% vs 1.9% and 9.1% vs 2.3%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The safety profile of ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in mCRC patients was similar in subgroups by age and initial irinotecan dose in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11282,"journal":{"name":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7b/fc/40801_2023_Article_366.PMC10491555.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-023-00366-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited real-world evidence regarding the safety of ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Objective: We evaluated the safety of ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with mCRC by age and initial dose of irinotecan.

Patients and methods: This single-arm, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, observational study was conducted between December 2016 and April 2020. Patients were observed for 12 months.

Results: Of 366 enrolled Japanese patients, 362 were eligible for study inclusion. The frequency of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) by age (≥ 75 years vs < 75 years) was 56.1% versus 50.2%, indicating no substantial differences between age groups. Grade ≥ 3 notable AEs, including neutropenia, proteinuria, and hypertension, were also similar in both age groups, but the frequency of any grade venous thromboembolic events was higher in those aged ≥ 75 years than in those aged < 75 years (7.0% vs 1.3%). The frequency of grade ≥ 3 AEs was slightly lower in patients receiving > 150 mg/m2 of irinotecan than in those receiving ≤ 150 mg/m2 of irinotecan (42.1% vs 53.6%); however, the frequency of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea, but not any grade diarrhea, and liver failure/injury was higher in patients receiving > 150 mg/m2 of irinotecan than in those receiving ≤ 150 mg/m2 of irinotecan (4.6% vs 1.9% and 9.1% vs 2.3%, respectively).

Conclusions: The safety profile of ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in mCRC patients was similar in subgroups by age and initial irinotecan dose in real-world settings.

Abstract Image

Ramucirumab加FOLFIRI上市后安全性研究:转移性结直肠癌癌症患者伊立替康的年龄和初始剂量分析。
背景:关于雷莫昔单抗加FOLFIRI治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的安全性,现实世界中的证据有限。患者和方法:这项单臂、前瞻性、多中心、非介入性观察性研究于2016年12月至2020年4月进行。对患者进行了12个月的观察。结果:在366名入选的日本患者中,362名符合纳入研究的条件。按年龄划分的≥3级不良事件(AE)的发生率(≥75岁vs 150 mg/m2的伊立替康)高于接受≤150 mg/m2伊立替康组(42.1%vs 53.6%);但腹泻次数≥3级,无任何级别腹泻,接受大于150 mg/m2伊立替康治疗的患者肝衰竭/损伤高于接受≤150 mg/m2伊立替康的患者(分别为4.6%vs 1.9%和9.1%vs 2.3%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Drugs - Real World Outcomes PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs - Real World Outcomes targets original research and definitive reviews regarding the use of real-world data to evaluate health outcomes and inform healthcare decision-making on drugs, devices and other interventions in clinical practice. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas: Using registries/databases/health records and other non-selected observational datasets to investigate: drug use and treatment outcomes prescription patterns drug safety signals adherence to treatment guidelines benefit : risk profiles comparative effectiveness economic analyses including cost-of-illness Data-driven research methodologies, including the capture, curation, search, sharing, analysis and interpretation of ‘big data’ Techniques and approaches to optimise real-world modelling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信