Treatment Satisfaction and Well-Being With Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People With Type 1 Diabetes: An Analysis Based on the GOLD Randomized Trial.

IF 4.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Daniel Pylov, William Polonsky, Henrik Imberg, Helen Holmer, Jarl Hellman, Magnus Wijkman, Jan Bolinder, Tim Heisse, Sofia Dahlqvist, Thomas Nyström, Erik Schwarz, Irl Hirsch, Marcus Lind
{"title":"Treatment Satisfaction and Well-Being With Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People With Type 1 Diabetes: An Analysis Based on the GOLD Randomized Trial.","authors":"Daniel Pylov, William Polonsky, Henrik Imberg, Helen Holmer, Jarl Hellman, Magnus Wijkman, Jan Bolinder, Tim Heisse, Sofia Dahlqvist, Thomas Nyström, Erik Schwarz, Irl Hirsch, Marcus Lind","doi":"10.1177/19322968231183974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The GOLD trial demonstrated that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) managed with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) improved not only glucose control but also overall well-being and treatment satisfaction. This analysis investigated which factors contributed to improved well-being and treatment satisfaction with CGM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The GOLD trial was a randomized crossover trial comparing CGM versus self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) over 16 months. Endpoints included well-being measured by the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and treatment satisfaction by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) as well as glucose metrics. Multivariable R<sup>2</sup>-decomposition was used to understand which variables contributed most to treatment satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 139 participants were included. Multivariable analyses revealed that increased convenience and flexibility contributed to 60% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 50%-69%) of the improvement in treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire <i>change</i> version [DTSQ<i>c</i>]) observed with CGM, whereas perceived effects on hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia only contributed to 6% (95% CI = 2%-11%) of improvements. Significant improvements in well-being (WHO-5) by CGM were observed for the following: feeling cheerful (<i>P</i> = .025), calm and relaxed (<i>P</i> = .024), being active (<i>P</i> = .046), and waking up fresh and rested (<i>P</i> = .044). HbA1c reductions and increased time in range (TIR) were associated with increased treatment satisfaction, whereas glycemic variability was not. HbA1c reduction showed also an association with increased well-being and increased TIR with less diabetes-related distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While CGM improves glucose control in people with T1D on MDI, increased convenience and flexibility through CGM is of even greater importance for treatment satisfaction and patient well-being. These CGM-mediated effects should be taken into account when considering CGM initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"143-152"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968231183974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The GOLD trial demonstrated that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) managed with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) improved not only glucose control but also overall well-being and treatment satisfaction. This analysis investigated which factors contributed to improved well-being and treatment satisfaction with CGM.

Methods: The GOLD trial was a randomized crossover trial comparing CGM versus self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) over 16 months. Endpoints included well-being measured by the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and treatment satisfaction by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) as well as glucose metrics. Multivariable R2-decomposition was used to understand which variables contributed most to treatment satisfaction.

Results: A total of 139 participants were included. Multivariable analyses revealed that increased convenience and flexibility contributed to 60% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 50%-69%) of the improvement in treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version [DTSQc]) observed with CGM, whereas perceived effects on hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia only contributed to 6% (95% CI = 2%-11%) of improvements. Significant improvements in well-being (WHO-5) by CGM were observed for the following: feeling cheerful (P = .025), calm and relaxed (P = .024), being active (P = .046), and waking up fresh and rested (P = .044). HbA1c reductions and increased time in range (TIR) were associated with increased treatment satisfaction, whereas glycemic variability was not. HbA1c reduction showed also an association with increased well-being and increased TIR with less diabetes-related distress.

Conclusions: While CGM improves glucose control in people with T1D on MDI, increased convenience and flexibility through CGM is of even greater importance for treatment satisfaction and patient well-being. These CGM-mediated effects should be taken into account when considering CGM initiation.

T1D 患者对 CGM 治疗的满意度和幸福感:基于 GOLD 随机试验的分析。
背景:GOLD试验表明,对每日多次胰岛素注射(MDI)的1型糖尿病(T1D)患者进行连续血糖监测(CGM)不仅能改善血糖控制,还能改善整体健康和治疗满意度。本分析调查了哪些因素有助于提高CGM的幸福感和治疗满意度:GOLD 试验是一项为期 16 个月的随机交叉试验,比较了 CGM 与自我监测血糖 (SMBG) 的效果。终点包括以世界卫生组织五项幸福指数(WHO-5)衡量的幸福感、以糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQ)衡量的治疗满意度以及血糖指标。采用多变量 R2 分解法了解哪些变量对治疗满意度的影响最大:结果:共纳入 139 名参与者。多变量分析表明,在使用 CGM 后观察到的治疗满意度(糖尿病治疗满意度问卷变化版 [DTSQc])改善中,方便性和灵活性的提高占 60%(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 50%-69%),而对低血糖和高血糖影响的感知仅占改善的 6%(95% CI = 2%-11%)。通过 CGM 观察到以下方面的幸福感(WHO-5)有明显改善:心情开朗(P = .025)、平静和放松(P = .024)、活跃(P = .046)以及起床后精神饱满(P = .044)。HbA1c 降低和在量程内的时间(TIR)增加与治疗满意度的提高有关,而血糖变异性则与之无关。HbA1c 降低还与幸福感增加有关,TIR 增加则与糖尿病相关困扰减少有关:虽然 CGM 可改善使用 MDI 的 T1D 患者的血糖控制,但 CGM 带来的便利性和灵活性对于提高治疗满意度和患者的幸福感更为重要。在考虑启动 CGM 时,应考虑到 CGM 所带来的这些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信