Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Treatment Timing does not Impact Survival in Stage 4 Colon Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Study.

Kansas Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-22 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol15.15975
Braden M Johnson, Tony A Pham, Kate J Young, Leonidas E Bantis, Weijing Sun, Anup Kasi
{"title":"Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Treatment Timing does not Impact Survival in Stage 4 Colon Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Braden M Johnson,&nbsp;Tony A Pham,&nbsp;Kate J Young,&nbsp;Leonidas E Bantis,&nbsp;Weijing Sun,&nbsp;Anup Kasi","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol15.15975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colon cancer impacts the lives of Kansans and those across the United States. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, such as panitumumab and cetuximab, have gained popularity as first-line treatment for stage 4 colon cancer despite their toxicities and have been used by clinicians in later lines of therapy. EGFR inhibitors have been proven to be an efficacious first-line treatment for stage 4 colon cancer, but no study has investigated outcomes comparing EGFR inhibitors as first-line treatment to its use as second- or third-line treatment. This study investigated EGFR inhibitor therapy estimated overall survival when used as first-, second-, and third-line treatment for stage 4 colon cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was done for patients with stage 4 colon cancer who underwent EGFR inhibitor treatment at a large academic center from November 2007 to August 2021. The patients were stratified into five groups by the line in which they received the EGFR inhibitor treatment. A log-rank test was used to analyze the groups, and the median survival for each group was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 patients were reviewed; 18 received first-line, 23 received second-line, 18 received third-line, 6 received fourth-line, and 3 received sixth-line treatment with an EGFR inhibitor. Fourth- and sixth-line therapies were excluded due to small patient size. There was no significant difference in estimated survival time between any of the lines. Median survival of the therapies was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no statistical difference in survival between the first-, second-, or third-line groups, which may provide justification for its use as a second- or third-line therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17991,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","volume":"15 ","pages":"273-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/ef/15-273.PMC9409940.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.15975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Colon cancer impacts the lives of Kansans and those across the United States. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, such as panitumumab and cetuximab, have gained popularity as first-line treatment for stage 4 colon cancer despite their toxicities and have been used by clinicians in later lines of therapy. EGFR inhibitors have been proven to be an efficacious first-line treatment for stage 4 colon cancer, but no study has investigated outcomes comparing EGFR inhibitors as first-line treatment to its use as second- or third-line treatment. This study investigated EGFR inhibitor therapy estimated overall survival when used as first-, second-, and third-line treatment for stage 4 colon cancer.

Methods: A retrospective review was done for patients with stage 4 colon cancer who underwent EGFR inhibitor treatment at a large academic center from November 2007 to August 2021. The patients were stratified into five groups by the line in which they received the EGFR inhibitor treatment. A log-rank test was used to analyze the groups, and the median survival for each group was determined.

Results: A total of 68 patients were reviewed; 18 received first-line, 23 received second-line, 18 received third-line, 6 received fourth-line, and 3 received sixth-line treatment with an EGFR inhibitor. Fourth- and sixth-line therapies were excluded due to small patient size. There was no significant difference in estimated survival time between any of the lines. Median survival of the therapies was found.

Conclusions: There was no statistical difference in survival between the first-, second-, or third-line groups, which may provide justification for its use as a second- or third-line therapy.

Abstract Image

表皮生长因子受体抑制剂治疗时机不影响癌症4期治疗的存活率:一项回顾性研究。
简介:癌症影响着堪萨斯人和美国各地的人的生活。表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制剂,如帕尼单抗和西妥昔单抗,尽管具有毒性,但作为癌症4期的一线治疗方法,已广受欢迎,并已被临床医生用于后期的治疗。EGFR抑制剂已被证明是癌症4期的有效一线治疗方法,但没有研究将EGFR抑制剂作为一线治疗与作为二线或三线治疗进行比较的结果。本研究调查了EGFR抑制剂治疗作为癌症4期的一线、二线和三线治疗时估计的总生存率。方法:对2007年11月至2021年8月在大型学术中心接受EGFR抑制剂治疗的癌症4期患者进行回顾性研究。根据患者接受EGFR抑制剂治疗的情况,将患者分为五组。对数秩检验用于分析各组,并确定各组的中位生存率。结果:共回顾性分析68例患者;18人接受一线治疗,23人接受二线治疗,18人接受三线治疗,6人接受四线治疗,3人接受EGFR抑制剂的六线治疗。由于患者人数较少,四线和六线疗法被排除在外。在任何一个品系之间,估计存活时间没有显著差异。发现了这些疗法的中位生存率。结论:一线组、二线组或三线组的生存率没有统计学差异,这可能为其作为二线或三线治疗提供了理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信