Evaluation of sagittal root position and labial alveolar bone concavity in the maxillary anterior tooth area for immediate implant placement.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Muhammad Ikbal, Yen-Wen Shen, Muhammad Ruslin, Lih-Jyh Fuh, Jui-Ting Hsu
{"title":"Evaluation of sagittal root position and labial alveolar bone concavity in the maxillary anterior tooth area for immediate implant placement.","authors":"Muhammad Ikbal,&nbsp;Yen-Wen Shen,&nbsp;Muhammad Ruslin,&nbsp;Lih-Jyh Fuh,&nbsp;Jui-Ting Hsu","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anatomical characteristics of the maxillary labial alveolar bone play a crucial role in the treatment planning of immediate implant placement. The sagittal root position (SRP) and alveolar bone concavity are closely related to anatomical characteristics in determining the ideal implant position. This study evaluated the SRP and labial alveolar bone concavity in the maxillary anterior teeth area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cone-beam computed tomography images of 120 samples involving 720 teeth were uploaded to the medical imaging software. The SRP was classified as Class I, II, III, or IV, and the concavity of labial alveolar bone was measured. A T test was performed to compare measurements between the central and lateral incisors, between the central incisors and canines, and between the lateral incisors and canine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the SRPs of the maxillary anterior teeth were class I (engaging the labial cortical plate) with frequencies of 98.3%, 85.8%, and 81.7% for the canines, lateral incisors, and central incisors, respectively. In terms of concavity of labial alveolar bone in maxillary tooth area, canines also had the largest mean value (139.5°), followed by lateral incisors, whereas central incisors has the smallest mean value (131.7°). The results of the T test revealed a significant difference ( p < 0.001) in labial alveolar bone concavity between central and lateral incisors, between central incisors and canines, and between lateral incisors and canines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most maxillary anterior teeth were classified as Class I SRP, Class III SRP was the least prevalent, and the concavity of the labial alveolar bone significantly differed between the central and lateral incisors, between the central incisors and canines, and between the lateral incisors and canines. In addition, the canines had the highest mean alveolar bone concavity angle, indicating that less concavity in the canines area.</p>","PeriodicalId":17251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","volume":"86 6","pages":"565-570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The anatomical characteristics of the maxillary labial alveolar bone play a crucial role in the treatment planning of immediate implant placement. The sagittal root position (SRP) and alveolar bone concavity are closely related to anatomical characteristics in determining the ideal implant position. This study evaluated the SRP and labial alveolar bone concavity in the maxillary anterior teeth area.

Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 120 samples involving 720 teeth were uploaded to the medical imaging software. The SRP was classified as Class I, II, III, or IV, and the concavity of labial alveolar bone was measured. A T test was performed to compare measurements between the central and lateral incisors, between the central incisors and canines, and between the lateral incisors and canine.

Results: The majority of the SRPs of the maxillary anterior teeth were class I (engaging the labial cortical plate) with frequencies of 98.3%, 85.8%, and 81.7% for the canines, lateral incisors, and central incisors, respectively. In terms of concavity of labial alveolar bone in maxillary tooth area, canines also had the largest mean value (139.5°), followed by lateral incisors, whereas central incisors has the smallest mean value (131.7°). The results of the T test revealed a significant difference ( p < 0.001) in labial alveolar bone concavity between central and lateral incisors, between central incisors and canines, and between lateral incisors and canines.

Conclusion: Most maxillary anterior teeth were classified as Class I SRP, Class III SRP was the least prevalent, and the concavity of the labial alveolar bone significantly differed between the central and lateral incisors, between the central incisors and canines, and between the lateral incisors and canines. In addition, the canines had the highest mean alveolar bone concavity angle, indicating that less concavity in the canines area.

上颌前牙区矢状根位置及唇槽骨凹度对即刻种植的评价。
背景:上颌唇牙槽骨的解剖特征对即刻种植的治疗计划起着至关重要的作用。矢状根位置(SRP)和牙槽骨凹度与确定理想种植位置的解剖学特征密切相关。本研究对上颌前牙区域的SRP和唇槽骨凹进行了评价。方法:将120例720颗牙齿的ct图像上传到医学成像软件中。SRP分为I级、II级、III级和IV级,并测量唇槽骨的凹度。采用T检验比较中切牙与侧切牙、中切牙与犬齿、侧切牙与犬齿之间的测量值。结果:上颌前牙的srp以ⅰ类(与唇皮质板结合)居多,犬齿、侧切牙和中切牙的频率分别为98.3%、85.8%和81.7%。上颌牙区唇槽骨凹度均值犬科最大(139.5°),其次为侧切牙,中切牙最小(131.7°)。T检验结果显示,中切牙与侧切牙、中切牙与犬齿、侧切牙与犬齿的唇槽骨凹度差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。结论:上颌前牙多为ⅰ类SRP,ⅲ类SRP发生率最低,中、侧切牙、中切牙与犬齿、侧切牙与犬齿的唇槽骨凹度差异显著。此外,犬齿的平均牙槽骨凹角最高,说明犬齿区域的凹度较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
15.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, previously known as the Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), has a long history of publishing scientific papers and has continuously made substantial contribution in the understanding and progress of a broad range of biomedical sciences. It is published monthly by Wolters Kluwer Health and indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), MEDLINE®, Index Medicus, EMBASE, CAB Abstracts, Sociedad Iberoamericana de Informacion Cientifica (SIIC) Data Bases, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Global Health. JCMA is the official and open access journal of the Chinese Medical Association, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China and is an international forum for scholarly reports in medicine, surgery, dentistry and basic research in biomedical science. As a vehicle of communication and education among physicians and scientists, the journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Reports of professional practice will need to demonstrate academic robustness and scientific rigor. Outstanding scholars are invited to give their update reviews on the perspectives of the evidence-based science in the related research field. Article types accepted include review articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications and letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信