Intrahepatic Injection of Sodium Pentobarbital as an Alternative to Intraperitoneal Injection for the Euthanasia of Rats (Rattus norvegicus).

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Colin A Laferriere, Vivian Sy Leung, Frédérik Rousseau-Blass, Vanessa Lalonde-Robert, Daniel Sj Pang
{"title":"Intrahepatic Injection of Sodium Pentobarbital as an Alternative to Intraperitoneal Injection for the Euthanasia of Rats (<i>Rattus norvegicus</i>).","authors":"Colin A Laferriere,&nbsp;Vivian Sy Leung,&nbsp;Frédérik Rousseau-Blass,&nbsp;Vanessa Lalonde-Robert,&nbsp;Daniel Sj Pang","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most commonly accepted method of rat euthanasia in North America is intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital (PB). However, misinjection can occur, and intraperitoneal PB may cause pain and distress. The objective of this study was to test an alternative method of euthanasia: intrahepatic injection of PB. A pilot study was conducted to develop a method of intrahepatic injections (evaluated using CT scans and test injections), followed by a full study comparing intraperitoneal (<i>n</i> = 14) and intrahepatic PB injections (<i>n</i> = 66) in adult rats. Full study outcomes were: 1) time from injection to loss of right- ing reflex (LORR), 2) time from injection to cessation of heartbeat (CHB), 3) number of failed euthanasia attempts, and 4) confirmation of successful intrahepatic injection or misinjection via necropsy. All injections were performed by a veterinary student. CT revealed that intrahepatic injections were feasible. Times (median [range]) to LORR and CHB were faster after successful intrahepatic injections (LORR, 3 s [1 to 5 s]; CHB, 8 s [2 to 242 s]) than after intraperitoneal injections (LORR, 89.5 s [73 to 110 s], CHB: 284.5 s [237 to 423 s]). The misinjection rate was higher with intrahepatic injections (59%) than with intraperitoneal injections (29%), but intrahepatic misinjection still resulted in fast and successful euthanasia (LORR, 29 s [1 to 96 s]; CHB, 216 s [12 to 330 s]), with the injectate distributed between the intraperitoneal and intrahepatic locations. The number of failed euthanasia attempts with intrahepatic injections was low (<i>n</i> <i>=</i> 2). Intrahepatic injections show potential as an alternative to intraperitoneal injections for rat euthanasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8956212/pdf/jaalas2022000201.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most commonly accepted method of rat euthanasia in North America is intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital (PB). However, misinjection can occur, and intraperitoneal PB may cause pain and distress. The objective of this study was to test an alternative method of euthanasia: intrahepatic injection of PB. A pilot study was conducted to develop a method of intrahepatic injections (evaluated using CT scans and test injections), followed by a full study comparing intraperitoneal (n = 14) and intrahepatic PB injections (n = 66) in adult rats. Full study outcomes were: 1) time from injection to loss of right- ing reflex (LORR), 2) time from injection to cessation of heartbeat (CHB), 3) number of failed euthanasia attempts, and 4) confirmation of successful intrahepatic injection or misinjection via necropsy. All injections were performed by a veterinary student. CT revealed that intrahepatic injections were feasible. Times (median [range]) to LORR and CHB were faster after successful intrahepatic injections (LORR, 3 s [1 to 5 s]; CHB, 8 s [2 to 242 s]) than after intraperitoneal injections (LORR, 89.5 s [73 to 110 s], CHB: 284.5 s [237 to 423 s]). The misinjection rate was higher with intrahepatic injections (59%) than with intraperitoneal injections (29%), but intrahepatic misinjection still resulted in fast and successful euthanasia (LORR, 29 s [1 to 96 s]; CHB, 216 s [12 to 330 s]), with the injectate distributed between the intraperitoneal and intrahepatic locations. The number of failed euthanasia attempts with intrahepatic injections was low (n = 2). Intrahepatic injections show potential as an alternative to intraperitoneal injections for rat euthanasia.

Abstract Image

戊巴比妥钠肝内注射替代腹腔注射对褐家鼠安乐死的影响。
北美最普遍接受的大鼠安乐死方法是腹腔注射戊巴比妥钠(PB)。然而,误注可能发生,腹腔内的PB可能引起疼痛和窘迫。本研究的目的是测试另一种安乐死方法:肝内注射PB。一项初步研究开发了肝内注射方法(通过CT扫描和试验注射进行评估),随后对成年大鼠进行了腹腔注射(n = 14)和肝内注射(n = 66)的全面研究。完整的研究结果包括:1)从注射到右侧反射丧失(LORR)的时间,2)从注射到心跳停止(CHB)的时间,3)失败的安乐死尝试次数,4)通过尸检确认肝内注射成功或误注射。所有注射均由一名兽医学生进行。CT显示肝内注射可行。肝内注射成功后到LORR和CHB的时间(中位数[范围])更快(LORR, 3 s [1 ~ 5 s];CHB: 8 s [2 ~ 242 s])比腹腔注射后(LORR: 89.5 s [73 ~ 110 s], CHB: 284.5 s [237 ~ 423 s])。肝内注射的误注率(59%)高于腹腔注射(29%),但肝内误注仍能导致快速成功的安乐死(LORR, 29 s [1 ~ 96 s];CHB, 216 s [12 ~ 330 s]),注射分布在腹腔内和肝内。肝内注射失败的安乐死尝试数量很低(n = 2)。肝内注射显示出作为腹腔注射替代大鼠安乐死的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
35.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (JAALAS) serves as an official communication vehicle for the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS). The journal includes a section of refereed articles and a section of AALAS association news. All signed articles, including refereed articles and book reviews, editorials, committee reports, and news and commentary, reflect the individual views of the authors and are not official views of AALAS. The mission of the refereed section of the journal is to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed information on animal biology, technology, facility operations, management, and compliance as relevant to the AALAS membership. JAALAS accepts research reports (data-based) or scholarly reports (literature-based), with the caveat that all articles, including solicited manuscripts, must include appropriate references and must undergo peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信