Measurement of the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG utilising a computerised algorithm: A retrospective observational study.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
S C Chivers, T Vasavan, M Nandi, B R Hayes-Gill, I A Jayawardane, J M Simpson, C Williamson, W P Fifer, M Lucchini
{"title":"Measurement of the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG utilising a computerised algorithm: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"S C Chivers,&nbsp;T Vasavan,&nbsp;M Nandi,&nbsp;B R Hayes-Gill,&nbsp;I A Jayawardane,&nbsp;J M Simpson,&nbsp;C Williamson,&nbsp;W P Fifer,&nbsp;M Lucchini","doi":"10.1177/20480040221096209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Establish whether the reliable measurement of cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG can be automated and to address whether this approach could be used to investigate large datasets.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Teaching hospitals in London UK, Nottingham UK and New York USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Singleton pregnancies with no known fetal abnormality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Archived fetal ECG's performed using the MonicaAN24 monitor. A single ECG (PQRST) complex was generated from 5000 signal-averaged beats and electrical cardiac time intervals measured in an automated way and manually.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Validation of a newly developed algorithm to measure the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>188/236 (79.7%) subjects with fECGs of suitable signal:noise ratio were included for analysis comparing manual with automated measurement. PR interval was measured in 173/188 (92%), QRS complex in 170/188 (90%) and QT interval in 123/188 (65.4%). PR interval was 107.6 (12.07) ms [mean(SD)] manual vs 109.11 (14.7) ms algorithm. QRS duration was 54.72(6.35) ms manual vs 58.34(5.73) ms algorithm. QT-interval was 268.93 (21.59) ms manual vs 261.63 (36.16) ms algorithm. QTc was 407.5(32.71) ms manual vs 396.4 (54.78) ms algorithm. The QRS-duration increased with gestational age in both manual and algorithm measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate measurement of fetal ECG cardiac time intervals can be automated with potential application to interpretation of larger datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20480040221096209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/3e/10.1177_20480040221096209.PMC9102181.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040221096209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Establish whether the reliable measurement of cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG can be automated and to address whether this approach could be used to investigate large datasets.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Setting: Teaching hospitals in London UK, Nottingham UK and New York USA.

Participants: Singleton pregnancies with no known fetal abnormality.

Methods: Archived fetal ECG's performed using the MonicaAN24 monitor. A single ECG (PQRST) complex was generated from 5000 signal-averaged beats and electrical cardiac time intervals measured in an automated way and manually.

Main outcome measure: Validation of a newly developed algorithm to measure the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG.

Results: 188/236 (79.7%) subjects with fECGs of suitable signal:noise ratio were included for analysis comparing manual with automated measurement. PR interval was measured in 173/188 (92%), QRS complex in 170/188 (90%) and QT interval in 123/188 (65.4%). PR interval was 107.6 (12.07) ms [mean(SD)] manual vs 109.11 (14.7) ms algorithm. QRS duration was 54.72(6.35) ms manual vs 58.34(5.73) ms algorithm. QT-interval was 268.93 (21.59) ms manual vs 261.63 (36.16) ms algorithm. QTc was 407.5(32.71) ms manual vs 396.4 (54.78) ms algorithm. The QRS-duration increased with gestational age in both manual and algorithm measurements.

Conclusion: Accurate measurement of fetal ECG cardiac time intervals can be automated with potential application to interpretation of larger datasets.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用计算机化算法测量胎儿心电图的心脏时间间隔:一项回顾性观察研究。
目的:确定胎儿心电图心脏时间间隔的可靠测量是否可以自动化,并探讨该方法是否可用于调查大型数据集。设计:回顾性观察性研究。地点:英国伦敦、英国诺丁汉和美国纽约的教学医院。参与者:没有已知胎儿异常的单胎妊娠。方法:采用MonicaAN24监护仪记录胎儿心电图。单心电图(PQRST)复合体由5000次信号平均心跳和以自动和手动方式测量的心电时间间隔生成。主要结果测量:验证了一种新开发的算法来测量胎儿心电图的心脏时间间隔。结果:有188/236例(79.7%)受试者的脑电图信噪比符合要求,进行人工测量与自动测量的对比分析。PR间期173/188 (92%),QRS复合体170/188 (90%),QT间期123/188(65.4%)。PR间隔为107.6 (12.07)ms [mean(SD)]手动vs 109.11 (14.7) ms算法。QRS持续时间为54.72(6.35)ms手动vs 58.34(5.73) ms算法。QT-interval为268.93 (21.59)ms手动vs 261.63 (36.16) ms算法。QTc为407.5(32.71)ms手动vs 396.4 (54.78) ms算法。人工和算法测量的qrs持续时间随胎龄增加。结论:胎儿心电图心脏时间间隔的精确测量可以自动化,并有可能应用于解释更大的数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信