Percutaneous catheter drainage in retroperitoneal abscesses: a single centre's 8-year experience.

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Gulsah Yildirim, Hakki Karakas
{"title":"Percutaneous catheter drainage in retroperitoneal abscesses: a single centre's 8-year experience.","authors":"Gulsah Yildirim,&nbsp;Hakki Karakas","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.115815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We have investigated the technical and clinical success of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in retroperitoneal abscesses and factors that may affect the outcome.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study cohort included 45 patients (17 females and 29 males, with mean age of 56.3 years) that were treated between 2012 and 2020. Forty-seven abscesses were managed with PCD under ultrasonography, computed tomography, or fluoroscopy guidance. Patients' demographics, lesion locations, predisposing factors, clini-cal presentation, etiology, radiological findings, technical factors, and outcome parameters were presented using exploratory and descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Abscesses were located in the psoas (<i>n</i> = 25, 55.3%), renal-perirenal (<i>n</i> = 7, 14.8%), and pararenal (<i>n</i> = 14, 29.7%) compartments. The mean preprocedural volume was 263.3 (30-1310) ml. Pain (abdominal and back) (57.4%) and fever (17%) were the most frequent presenting symptoms. The most common predisposing factors were previous surgery (<i>n</i> = 17, 36.1%) and diabetes mellitus (<i>n</i> = 11, 25.5%). Clinical success was attained in 89.3% of abscesses (definitive treatment 72.3% and partial success 17.0%). There was a statistically significant difference between the iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic groups regarding clinical success (<i>p</i> = 0.031). No mortality was encountered. The complication rate was 6.6% and were all minor. The average rate of recurrence was 10.6%. The mean time to catheter removal was 15.8 ± 13.2 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCD is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of retroperitoneal abscesses. Procedure-related mortality, morbidity, and complication rates are low. Underlying etiology is a significant factor affecting the outcome. Nevertheless, PCD may provide definitive treatment in the majority of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":"87 ","pages":"e238-e245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f8/1b/PJR-87-46913.PMC9093211.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.115815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: We have investigated the technical and clinical success of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in retroperitoneal abscesses and factors that may affect the outcome.

Material and methods: The study cohort included 45 patients (17 females and 29 males, with mean age of 56.3 years) that were treated between 2012 and 2020. Forty-seven abscesses were managed with PCD under ultrasonography, computed tomography, or fluoroscopy guidance. Patients' demographics, lesion locations, predisposing factors, clini-cal presentation, etiology, radiological findings, technical factors, and outcome parameters were presented using exploratory and descriptive statistics.

Results: Abscesses were located in the psoas (n = 25, 55.3%), renal-perirenal (n = 7, 14.8%), and pararenal (n = 14, 29.7%) compartments. The mean preprocedural volume was 263.3 (30-1310) ml. Pain (abdominal and back) (57.4%) and fever (17%) were the most frequent presenting symptoms. The most common predisposing factors were previous surgery (n = 17, 36.1%) and diabetes mellitus (n = 11, 25.5%). Clinical success was attained in 89.3% of abscesses (definitive treatment 72.3% and partial success 17.0%). There was a statistically significant difference between the iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic groups regarding clinical success (p = 0.031). No mortality was encountered. The complication rate was 6.6% and were all minor. The average rate of recurrence was 10.6%. The mean time to catheter removal was 15.8 ± 13.2 days.

Conclusions: PCD is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of retroperitoneal abscesses. Procedure-related mortality, morbidity, and complication rates are low. Underlying etiology is a significant factor affecting the outcome. Nevertheless, PCD may provide definitive treatment in the majority of patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经皮导管引流腹膜后脓肿:一个中心8年的经验。
目的:我们研究经皮导管引流治疗腹膜后脓肿的技术和临床成功,以及可能影响结果的因素。材料与方法:研究队列纳入2012 - 2020年间接受治疗的45例患者(女性17例,男性29例,平均年龄56.3岁)。47个脓肿在超声、计算机断层扫描或透视指导下进行PCD治疗。患者的人口统计学、病变部位、易感因素、临床表现、病因、放射学表现、技术因素和结局参数采用探索性和描述性统计。结果:脓肿位于腰肌间室(n = 25, 55.3%)、肾周间室(n = 7, 14.8%)和肾旁间室(n = 14, 29.7%)。手术前平均容积为263.3 (30-1310)ml。最常见的症状是腹部和背部疼痛(57.4%)和发烧(17%)。最常见的易感因素是既往手术(n = 17, 36.1%)和糖尿病(n = 11, 25.5%)。89.3%的脓肿获得临床成功(最终治疗72.3%,部分成功17.0%)。医源性组和非医源性组的临床成功率差异有统计学意义(p = 0.031)。没有人死亡。并发症发生率为6.6%,均为轻微并发症。平均复发率为10.6%。平均拔管时间15.8±13.2天。结论:PCD是一种安全有效的治疗腹膜后脓肿的方法。手术相关的死亡率、发病率和并发症发生率都很低。潜在病因是影响预后的重要因素。然而,PCD可以为大多数患者提供明确的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信