Development and validation of the scale for measuring biopsychosocial approach of family physicians to their patients.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Irena Makivić, Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš
{"title":"Development and validation of the scale for measuring biopsychosocial approach of family physicians to their patients.","authors":"Irena Makivić,&nbsp;Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2021-001407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While other models focus more on disease and pathophysiology, the biopsychosocial approach emphasises the importance of human health and disease in their fullest contexts. If we are to gain an insight into physical and psychological health needs, and address them quickly and adequately, it is important that we recognise them already at the family practice stage. An approach that assesses needs at patient level could also be seen as patient-centred care, which is one of the key elements of high-quality care. To the best of our knowledge, no scale for measuring the biopsychosocial approach of family physicians has yet been developed.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and validate a scale that measures the biopsychosocial approach of family physicians to their patients through the Delphi and validation process.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The scale was developed through the Delphi study and validated by means of significant statistical methods. Pearson's correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, the intracorrelation coefficient, the Spearman-Brown coefficient and exploratory factor analysis were applied.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Five family physicians took part in a brainstorming process and 24 family medicine experts took part in the Delphi study. For the first part of the validation process, there were 31 family medicine trainees in the first group and 32 in the second group. For the last part of the validation process, 164 family physicians completed the scale.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Through the Delphi study, 39 final items covering three areas within the biopsychosocial approach were identified. Construct validity was high, with positive linear correlation and good face validity. The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.862. The Spearman-Brown coefficient was the highest (0.931) on an even and odd division. Factor rotation showed that three factors on 35 items explained 39.5% of variances. The final internal consistency on 35 items was 0.911.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed scale measures the biopsychosocial dimension of family physicians' work with high Cronbach's alpha measures and good validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114858/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: While other models focus more on disease and pathophysiology, the biopsychosocial approach emphasises the importance of human health and disease in their fullest contexts. If we are to gain an insight into physical and psychological health needs, and address them quickly and adequately, it is important that we recognise them already at the family practice stage. An approach that assesses needs at patient level could also be seen as patient-centred care, which is one of the key elements of high-quality care. To the best of our knowledge, no scale for measuring the biopsychosocial approach of family physicians has yet been developed.

Design: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a scale that measures the biopsychosocial approach of family physicians to their patients through the Delphi and validation process.

Setting: The scale was developed through the Delphi study and validated by means of significant statistical methods. Pearson's correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, the intracorrelation coefficient, the Spearman-Brown coefficient and exploratory factor analysis were applied.

Participants: Five family physicians took part in a brainstorming process and 24 family medicine experts took part in the Delphi study. For the first part of the validation process, there were 31 family medicine trainees in the first group and 32 in the second group. For the last part of the validation process, 164 family physicians completed the scale.

Result: Through the Delphi study, 39 final items covering three areas within the biopsychosocial approach were identified. Construct validity was high, with positive linear correlation and good face validity. The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.862. The Spearman-Brown coefficient was the highest (0.931) on an even and odd division. Factor rotation showed that three factors on 35 items explained 39.5% of variances. The final internal consistency on 35 items was 0.911.

Conclusion: The developed scale measures the biopsychosocial dimension of family physicians' work with high Cronbach's alpha measures and good validity.

Abstract Image

家庭医生对患者的生物心理社会方法量表的开发与验证。
目的:虽然其他模型更多地关注疾病和病理生理学,但生物心理社会方法强调人类健康和疾病在其最充分背景下的重要性。如果我们要深入了解身体和心理健康需求,并迅速和充分地解决这些问题,重要的是我们已经在家庭实践阶段认识到这些问题。在患者层面评估需求的方法也可以被视为以患者为中心的护理,这是高质量护理的关键要素之一。据我们所知,目前还没有衡量家庭医生的生物心理社会方法的量表。设计:本研究的目的是开发和验证一个量表,通过德尔菲和验证过程来衡量家庭医生对患者的生物心理社会方法。设置:量表采用德尔菲法编制,并采用显著性统计方法进行验证。采用Pearson相关系数、Cronbach’s alpha、内相关系数、Spearman-Brown系数和探索性因子分析。参与者:5名家庭医生参与了头脑风暴过程,24名家庭医学专家参与了德尔菲研究。在验证过程的第一部分,第一组有31名家庭医学学员,第二组有32名。在验证过程的最后一部分,164名家庭医生完成了量表。结果:通过德尔菲研究,确定了涵盖生物心理社会方法三个领域的39个最终项目。构念效度高,呈线性正相关,面效度好。重测信度的类内相关系数为0.862。单双除法的Spearman-Brown系数最高,为0.931。因子轮换表明,35个项目的3个因子解释了39.5%的方差。最终35项的内部一致性为0.911。结论:编制的家庭医生工作生物心理社会维度量表具有较高的Cronbach α测量值和较好的效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信