Intratumoral Budding and CD8-Positive T-cell Density in Pretreatment Biopsies as a Predictor of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Advanced Rectal Cancer

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Shuhei Sano , Takashi Akiyoshi , Noriko Yamamoto , Yukiharu Hiyoshi , Toshiki Mukai , Tomohiro Yamaguchi , Toshiya Nagasaki , Akinobu Taketomi , Yosuke Fukunaga , Hiroshi Kawachi
{"title":"Intratumoral Budding and CD8-Positive T-cell Density in Pretreatment Biopsies as a Predictor of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Advanced Rectal Cancer","authors":"Shuhei Sano ,&nbsp;Takashi Akiyoshi ,&nbsp;Noriko Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Yukiharu Hiyoshi ,&nbsp;Toshiki Mukai ,&nbsp;Tomohiro Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Toshiya Nagasaki ,&nbsp;Akinobu Taketomi ,&nbsp;Yosuke Fukunaga ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Kawachi","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2023.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy<span> (CRT) is the standard treatment for advanced </span></span>rectal cancer<span>. Yet, the response to CRT varies from complete response to zero tumor regression.</span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p><span>The impact of intratumoral budding (ITB) and intratumoral CD8+ cell density on response to CRT and survival were evaluated in biopsy samples from 266 patients with advanced rectal cancer who were treated with long-course neoadjuvant CRT. The expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers was compared between patients with high and low ITB, using data from 174 patients with </span>RNA sequencing.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>High ITB was observed in 62 patients (23.3%). There was no association between ITB and CD8+ cell density. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that high CD8+ cell density (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.45-4.98; </span><em>P</em> = .002) was associated with good response to CRT, whereas high ITB (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.80; <em>P</em><span> = .014) was associated with poor response. Multivariable Cox regression analysis for survival showed that high CD8+ cell density was associated with better recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24-0.72; </span><em>P</em> = .002) and overall survival (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.74; <em>P</em> = .005), but significance values for ITB were marginal (<em>P</em> = .104 for recurrence-free survival and <em>P</em> = .163 for overall survival). The expression of EMT-related genes was not significantly different between patients with high and low ITB.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ITB and CD8+ cell density in biopsy samples may serve as useful biomarkers to predict therapy response in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant CRT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002823000634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for advanced rectal cancer. Yet, the response to CRT varies from complete response to zero tumor regression.

Materials and Methods

The impact of intratumoral budding (ITB) and intratumoral CD8+ cell density on response to CRT and survival were evaluated in biopsy samples from 266 patients with advanced rectal cancer who were treated with long-course neoadjuvant CRT. The expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers was compared between patients with high and low ITB, using data from 174 patients with RNA sequencing.

Results

High ITB was observed in 62 patients (23.3%). There was no association between ITB and CD8+ cell density. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that high CD8+ cell density (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.45-4.98; P = .002) was associated with good response to CRT, whereas high ITB (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.80; P = .014) was associated with poor response. Multivariable Cox regression analysis for survival showed that high CD8+ cell density was associated with better recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24-0.72; P = .002) and overall survival (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.74; P = .005), but significance values for ITB were marginal (P = .104 for recurrence-free survival and P = .163 for overall survival). The expression of EMT-related genes was not significantly different between patients with high and low ITB.

Conclusion

ITB and CD8+ cell density in biopsy samples may serve as useful biomarkers to predict therapy response in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant CRT.

肿瘤内芽肿和cd8阳性t细胞密度在预处理活检中作为晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗反应的预测因子。
背景:新辅助放化疗是晚期直肠癌的标准治疗方法。然而,对CRT的反应从完全缓解到零肿瘤消退不等。材料与方法:对266例接受长疗程新辅助CRT治疗的晚期直肠癌活检标本,评价肿瘤内芽肿(ITB)和肿瘤内CD8+细胞密度对CRT疗效和生存率的影响。使用来自174例患者的RNA测序数据,比较高和低ITB患者的上皮-间质转化(EMT)标志物的表达。结果:高颅内压62例(23.3%)。ITB与CD8+细胞密度无相关性。多变量logistic回归分析显示,高CD8+细胞密度(OR, 2.69;95% ci, 1.45-4.98;P = .002)与CRT反应良好相关,而高颅内出血(OR, 0.33;95% ci, 0.14-0.80;P = 0.014)与不良反应相关。多变量Cox回归分析显示,高CD8+细胞密度与较好的无复发生存率相关(HR, 0.41;95% ci, 0.24-0.72;P = 0.002)和总生存期(HR, 0.36;95% ci, 0.17-0.74;P = 0.005),但ITB的显著性值是边际的(无复发生存期P = 0.104,总生存期P = 0.163)。高、低ITB患者emt相关基因的表达无显著差异。结论:活检标本中ITB和CD8+细胞密度可作为预测直肠癌患者新辅助CRT治疗反应的有用生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信