Lockdown surgery: the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 measures on cardiac cases.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Felix Nägele, Clemens Engler, Michael Graber, Nina Remmel, Jakob Hirsch, Leo Pölzl, Rosalie Huber, Victor Schweiger, Juliane Kilo, Nikolaos Bonaros, Ivan Tancevski, Michael Grimm, Can Gollmann-Tepeköylü, Johannes Holfeld
{"title":"Lockdown surgery: the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 measures on cardiac cases.","authors":"Felix Nägele,&nbsp;Clemens Engler,&nbsp;Michael Graber,&nbsp;Nina Remmel,&nbsp;Jakob Hirsch,&nbsp;Leo Pölzl,&nbsp;Rosalie Huber,&nbsp;Victor Schweiger,&nbsp;Juliane Kilo,&nbsp;Nikolaos Bonaros,&nbsp;Ivan Tancevski,&nbsp;Michael Grimm,&nbsp;Can Gollmann-Tepeköylü,&nbsp;Johannes Holfeld","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivac060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The need to ration medical equipment and interventions during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic translated to an ever-lengthening wait list for surgical care. Retrospective analysis of lockdowns is of high importance to learn from the current situation for future pandemics. This monocentric study assessed the impact of lockdown periods on cardiac surgery cases and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The single-centre cross-sectional descriptive observational study was conducted to investigate the first lockdown period and the following post-lockdown period in comparison to the same periods during the previous 3 years at the Department of Cardiac Surgery at the Medical University of Innsbruck. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed from the department-specific quality management system. The primary objective was to compare the number of open-heart procedures between the prelockdown and the lockdown period. The secondary objectives were to analyse the characteristics and the outcomes of open-heart procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in patient demographics. A significant decrease of 29% in weekly surgical procedures was observed during the lockdown period. The surgical case-mix was unaffected: The numbers of aortic valve replacements, coronary artery bypass grafts, mitral valve repair or replacement procedures and others remained stable. The urgency of cases increased significantly, and the general health conditions of patients appeared to be worse. However, outcomes were unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By implementing a rational patient selection process, the quality of open-heart procedures was maintained even though patients who underwent surgery during lockdown were sicker and more symptomatic.</p>","PeriodicalId":13621,"journal":{"name":"Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047238/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The need to ration medical equipment and interventions during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic translated to an ever-lengthening wait list for surgical care. Retrospective analysis of lockdowns is of high importance to learn from the current situation for future pandemics. This monocentric study assessed the impact of lockdown periods on cardiac surgery cases and outcomes.

Methods: The single-centre cross-sectional descriptive observational study was conducted to investigate the first lockdown period and the following post-lockdown period in comparison to the same periods during the previous 3 years at the Department of Cardiac Surgery at the Medical University of Innsbruck. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed from the department-specific quality management system. The primary objective was to compare the number of open-heart procedures between the prelockdown and the lockdown period. The secondary objectives were to analyse the characteristics and the outcomes of open-heart procedures.

Results: There were no differences in patient demographics. A significant decrease of 29% in weekly surgical procedures was observed during the lockdown period. The surgical case-mix was unaffected: The numbers of aortic valve replacements, coronary artery bypass grafts, mitral valve repair or replacement procedures and others remained stable. The urgency of cases increased significantly, and the general health conditions of patients appeared to be worse. However, outcomes were unchanged.

Conclusions: By implementing a rational patient selection process, the quality of open-heart procedures was maintained even though patients who underwent surgery during lockdown were sicker and more symptomatic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

封锁手术:2019冠状病毒病措施对心脏病例的影响。
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,对医疗设备和干预措施的配给需求导致等待手术治疗的名单越来越长。对封锁的回顾性分析对于从目前的情况中吸取教训,为未来的大流行做好准备具有重要意义。这项单中心研究评估了封锁期对心脏手术病例和结果的影响。方法:采用单中心横断面描述性观察性研究,对因斯布鲁克医科大学心脏外科的第一次封城期和封城后的封城期进行调查,并与前3年的同期进行比较。前瞻性地收集数据,并从部门特定的质量管理体系中进行回顾性分析。主要目的是比较锁定前和锁定期间的心脏直视手术数量。次要目的是分析开胸手术的特点和结果。结果:两组患者人口统计学无差异。在封锁期间,每周的外科手术数量显著减少了29%。手术病例组合未受影响:主动脉瓣置换术、冠状动脉旁路移植术、二尖瓣修复或置换手术及其他手术的数量保持稳定。病例的急迫性大大增加,患者的一般健康状况似乎更糟。然而,结果没有改变。结论:通过实施合理的患者选择过程,即使在封锁期间接受手术的患者病情更重、症状更严重,也能保持心内直视手术的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
292
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery (ICVTS) publishes scientific contributions in the field of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, covering all aspects of surgery of the heart, vessels and the chest. The journal publishes a range of article types including: Best Evidence Topics; Brief Communications; Case Reports; Original Articles; State-of-the-Art; Work in Progress Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信