Compliance with hand-hygiene guidelines among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome, Italy.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Martina Antinozzi, Mariateresa Ceparano, Vincenzo Cammalleri, Valentina Baccolini, Daniela Tufi, Maria De Giusti, Paolo Villari, Carolina Marzuillo
{"title":"Compliance with hand-hygiene guidelines among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome, Italy.","authors":"Martina Antinozzi,&nbsp;Mariateresa Ceparano,&nbsp;Vincenzo Cammalleri,&nbsp;Valentina Baccolini,&nbsp;Daniela Tufi,&nbsp;Maria De Giusti,&nbsp;Paolo Villari,&nbsp;Carolina Marzuillo","doi":"10.4415/ANN_23_03_06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare-associated infections are often associated with poor hand hygiene (HH) by healthcare workers (HCWs). The objective of this cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital in Rome was to quantify compliance with HH by direct observation following a multimodal strategy devised by the World Health Organisation and to map critical areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Predictors of HH compliance were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four trained observers from 50 wards collected 4,081 observations showing that overall HH compliance was 71.9%. The multivariable analysis found a positive association with the outcome for midwives compared to physicians (aOR=2.5, 95% CI: 1.5-4.1), and a negative association for healthcare assistants (aOR=0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8). There was greater compliance during public holidays and weekends (aOR=1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1), but compliance was lower for external staff (aOR=0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9). We found a positive association with all HH indications after interaction with a patient or with patient surroundings compared with the indication \"before touching a patient\" (all p<0.001); the highest association was with the indication \"after contact with biological fluids\" (aOR=7.7, 95% CI: 4.7-12.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, we observed reasonable compliance levels, but it is important to increase adherence to HH practice and monitor any behaviour change.</p>","PeriodicalId":8246,"journal":{"name":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","volume":"59 3","pages":"204-212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_23_03_06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare-associated infections are often associated with poor hand hygiene (HH) by healthcare workers (HCWs). The objective of this cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital in Rome was to quantify compliance with HH by direct observation following a multimodal strategy devised by the World Health Organisation and to map critical areas for improvement.

Methods: Predictors of HH compliance were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results: Eighty-four trained observers from 50 wards collected 4,081 observations showing that overall HH compliance was 71.9%. The multivariable analysis found a positive association with the outcome for midwives compared to physicians (aOR=2.5, 95% CI: 1.5-4.1), and a negative association for healthcare assistants (aOR=0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8). There was greater compliance during public holidays and weekends (aOR=1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1), but compliance was lower for external staff (aOR=0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9). We found a positive association with all HH indications after interaction with a patient or with patient surroundings compared with the indication "before touching a patient" (all p<0.001); the highest association was with the indication "after contact with biological fluids" (aOR=7.7, 95% CI: 4.7-12.5).

Conclusion: Overall, we observed reasonable compliance levels, but it is important to increase adherence to HH practice and monitor any behaviour change.

医护人员遵守手部卫生指南的情况:意大利罗马Umberto I教学医院的一项横断面研究。
引言:与医疗保健相关的感染通常与医护人员手部卫生不良有关。这项在罗马Umberto I教学医院进行的横断面研究的目的是根据世界卫生组织制定的多模式策略,通过直接观察来量化HH的依从性,并绘制关键的改进领域。方法:采用多变量逻辑回归模型确定HH依从性的预测因素。计算调整后的比值比(aOR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:来自50个病房的84名训练有素的观察者收集了4081份观察结果,显示总体HH依从性为71.9%。多变量分析发现,与医生相比,助产士的结果呈正相关(aOR=2.5,95%CI:1.5-4.1),与医疗助理呈负相关(aOR=0.5,95%CI:0.3-0.8)。在公共假日和周末有更大的依从性(aOR=1.5,95%CI:1.1-2.1),但外部工作人员的依从性较低(aOR=0.7,95%CI:0.5-0.9)。我们发现,与“接触患者之前”的适应症相比,在与患者互动或与患者周围环境互动后,所有HH适应症都呈正相关(所有结论:总体而言,我们观察到了合理的合规水平,但重要的是要增加对HH实践的遵守,并监测任何行为变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita
Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità is a peer reviewed quarterly science journal which publishes research articles in biomedicine, translational research and in many other disciplines of the health sciences. The journal includes the following material: original articles, reviews, commentaries, editorials, brief and technical notes, book reviews. The publication of Monographic Sections has been discontinued. In case you wish to present a small number of coordinated contributions on specific themes concerning priorities in public health, please contact the Editorial office. The journal is in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信