Influence of Polymerization Postprocessing Procedures on the Accuracy of Additively Manufactured Dental Model Material.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Delaram Mostafavi, Mohammed M Methani, Wenceslao Piedra-Cascón, Amirali Zandinejad, Wael Att, Marta Revilla-León
{"title":"Influence of Polymerization Postprocessing Procedures on the Accuracy of Additively Manufactured Dental Model Material.","authors":"Delaram Mostafavi,&nbsp;Mohammed M Methani,&nbsp;Wenceslao Piedra-Cascón,&nbsp;Amirali Zandinejad,&nbsp;Wael Att,&nbsp;Marta Revilla-León","doi":"10.11607/ijp.7349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To measure the influence of postpolymerization condition (dry and water-submerged) and time (2, 10, 20, and 40 minutes) on the accuracy of additively manufactured model material.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A bar standard tessellation language (STL) file was used to manufacture all the resin specimens using a 3D printer. Two groups (n = 80 each) were created based on postpolymerization condition: dry (D group) and water-submerged (W group). Each group was then divided into four subgroups (D1 to D4 and W1 to W4; n = 20 each), which were each assigned a postpolymerizing time (2, 10, 20, and 40 minutes). The specimens' dimensions were measured using a low-force digital caliper. The volume was calculated as follows: V = l × w × h. Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the data were not normally distributed. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in length, width, height, and volume were found among the subgroups (P < .0018). In all groups, the width dimension (x-axis) presented less accuracy compared to height (z-axis) and length (y-axis) (P < .0018). The D2 and D4 subgroups obtained the closest dimensions to the virtual design, and there were no significant differences between these subgroups (P < .0018). The dry condition showed higher manufacturing accuracy than the water-submerged condition. In the water-submerged subgroups, the highest accuracy was obtained in the W2 and W4 subgroups (P < .0018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postpolymerization condition and time influenced the accuracy of the material tested. The dry postpolymerization condition with times of 10 and 40 minutes obtained the highest accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the influence of postpolymerization condition (dry and water-submerged) and time (2, 10, 20, and 40 minutes) on the accuracy of additively manufactured model material.

Materials and methods: A bar standard tessellation language (STL) file was used to manufacture all the resin specimens using a 3D printer. Two groups (n = 80 each) were created based on postpolymerization condition: dry (D group) and water-submerged (W group). Each group was then divided into four subgroups (D1 to D4 and W1 to W4; n = 20 each), which were each assigned a postpolymerizing time (2, 10, 20, and 40 minutes). The specimens' dimensions were measured using a low-force digital caliper. The volume was calculated as follows: V = l × w × h. Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the data were not normally distributed. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests (α = .05).

Results: Significant differences in length, width, height, and volume were found among the subgroups (P < .0018). In all groups, the width dimension (x-axis) presented less accuracy compared to height (z-axis) and length (y-axis) (P < .0018). The D2 and D4 subgroups obtained the closest dimensions to the virtual design, and there were no significant differences between these subgroups (P < .0018). The dry condition showed higher manufacturing accuracy than the water-submerged condition. In the water-submerged subgroups, the highest accuracy was obtained in the W2 and W4 subgroups (P < .0018).

Conclusions: Postpolymerization condition and time influenced the accuracy of the material tested. The dry postpolymerization condition with times of 10 and 40 minutes obtained the highest accuracy.

聚合后处理程序对增材制造牙科模型材料精度的影响。
目的:测量聚合后条件(干燥和水浸)和时间(2、10、20和40分钟)对增材制造模型材料精度的影响。材料和方法:使用条形标准镶嵌语言(STL)文件,使用3D打印机制作所有树脂样品。根据聚合后条件分为两组(n = 80):干燥组(D组)和水浸组(W组)。各组再分为4个亚组(D1 ~ D4、W1 ~ W4);N = 20每个),每个被分配聚合后时间(2,10,20和40分钟)。试样的尺寸是用低力数字卡尺测量的。体积计算公式为:V = l × w × h。夏皮罗-威尔克检验显示数据非正态分布。数据分析采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和两两Mann-Whitney U检验(α = 0.05)。结果:亚组间长、宽、高、体积差异有统计学意义(P < 0.0018)。在所有组中,宽度尺寸(x轴)与高度(z轴)和长度(y轴)相比精度较低(P < 0.0018)。D2和D4亚组获得最接近虚拟设计的维度,这些亚组之间无显著差异(P < 0.0018)。干燥条件下的加工精度高于浸水条件下。在水浸亚组中,W2和W4亚组的准确率最高(P < 0.0018)。结论:聚合后条件和时间影响检测材料的准确性。干燥后聚合条件下,时间分别为10分钟和40分钟,反应精度最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Prosthodontics
International Journal of Prosthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP) Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信