{"title":"Smartphone-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions in Blended Care of Cancer Survivors: Nested Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Gunther Meinlschmidt, Astrid Grossert, Cornelia Meffert, Noa Roemmel, Viviane Hess, Christoph Rochlitz, Miklos Pless, Sabina Hunziker, Brigitta Wössmer, Ulfried Geuter, Rainer Schaefert","doi":"10.2196/38515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is related to not only physical but also mental suffering. Notably, body image disturbances are highly relevant to cancer-related changes often persisting beyond recovery from cancer. Scalable and low-barrier interventions that can be blended with face-to-face psychotherapy for cancer survivors are highly warranted.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to investigate whether smartphone-based bodily interventions are more effective to improve the mood of patients with cancer than smartphone-based fairy tale interventions (control intervention).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited patients with cancer in 2 Swiss hospitals and conducted daily, fully automated smartphone-based interventions 6 times a week for 5 consecutive weeks, blended with weekly face-to-face group body psychotherapy. We applied 2 types of smartphone-based interventions using a within-subject design, randomly assigning patients daily to either bodily interventions or fairy tales. Each intervention type was presented 3 times a week. For this secondary analysis, 3-level mixed models were estimated with mood assessed by the 3 Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire subscales for good-bad mood, wakefulness, and calmness as key indicators. In addition, the effects on experience of presence, vitality, and burden assessed with visual analog scales were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the data from s=732 interventions performed by 36 participants, good-bad mood improved (β=.27; 95% CI 0.062-0.483), and participants became calmer (β=.98; 95% CI 0.740-1.211) following smartphone-based interventions. Wakefulness did not significantly change from pre- to postsmartphone-based intervention (β=.17; 95% CI -0.081 to 0.412). This was true for both intervention types. There was no interaction effect of intervention type with change in good-bad mood (β=-.01; 95% CI -0.439 to 0.417), calmness (β=.22; 95% CI -0.228 to 0.728), or wakefulness (β=.14; 95% CI -0.354 to 0.644). Experience of presence (β=.34; 95% CI 0.271-0.417) and vitality (β=.35; 95% CI 0.268-0.426) increased from pre- to postsmartphone-based intervention, while experience of burden decreased (β=-0.40; 95% CI -0.481 to 0.311). Again, these effects were present for both intervention types. There were no significant interaction effects of intervention type with pre- to postintervention changes in experience of presence (β=.14; 95% CI -0.104 to 0.384), experience of vitality (β=.06; 95% CI -0.152 to 0.265), and experience of burden (β=-.16; 95% CI -0.358 to 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that both smartphone-based audio-guided bodily interventions and fairy tales have the potential to improve the mood of cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03707548; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03707548.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.1186/s40359-019-0357-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/38515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cancer is related to not only physical but also mental suffering. Notably, body image disturbances are highly relevant to cancer-related changes often persisting beyond recovery from cancer. Scalable and low-barrier interventions that can be blended with face-to-face psychotherapy for cancer survivors are highly warranted.
Objective: The aim of the study is to investigate whether smartphone-based bodily interventions are more effective to improve the mood of patients with cancer than smartphone-based fairy tale interventions (control intervention).
Methods: We recruited patients with cancer in 2 Swiss hospitals and conducted daily, fully automated smartphone-based interventions 6 times a week for 5 consecutive weeks, blended with weekly face-to-face group body psychotherapy. We applied 2 types of smartphone-based interventions using a within-subject design, randomly assigning patients daily to either bodily interventions or fairy tales. Each intervention type was presented 3 times a week. For this secondary analysis, 3-level mixed models were estimated with mood assessed by the 3 Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire subscales for good-bad mood, wakefulness, and calmness as key indicators. In addition, the effects on experience of presence, vitality, and burden assessed with visual analog scales were investigated.
Results: Based on the data from s=732 interventions performed by 36 participants, good-bad mood improved (β=.27; 95% CI 0.062-0.483), and participants became calmer (β=.98; 95% CI 0.740-1.211) following smartphone-based interventions. Wakefulness did not significantly change from pre- to postsmartphone-based intervention (β=.17; 95% CI -0.081 to 0.412). This was true for both intervention types. There was no interaction effect of intervention type with change in good-bad mood (β=-.01; 95% CI -0.439 to 0.417), calmness (β=.22; 95% CI -0.228 to 0.728), or wakefulness (β=.14; 95% CI -0.354 to 0.644). Experience of presence (β=.34; 95% CI 0.271-0.417) and vitality (β=.35; 95% CI 0.268-0.426) increased from pre- to postsmartphone-based intervention, while experience of burden decreased (β=-0.40; 95% CI -0.481 to 0.311). Again, these effects were present for both intervention types. There were no significant interaction effects of intervention type with pre- to postintervention changes in experience of presence (β=.14; 95% CI -0.104 to 0.384), experience of vitality (β=.06; 95% CI -0.152 to 0.265), and experience of burden (β=-.16; 95% CI -0.358 to 0.017).
Conclusions: Our results suggest that both smartphone-based audio-guided bodily interventions and fairy tales have the potential to improve the mood of cancer survivors.
背景:癌症不仅与身体上的痛苦有关,而且与精神上的痛苦有关。值得注意的是,身体形象障碍与癌症相关的变化高度相关,这些变化往往持续到癌症康复之后。可扩展和低障碍的干预措施可以与面对面的心理治疗相结合,对癌症幸存者来说是非常必要的。目的:本研究旨在探讨基于智能手机的身体干预是否比基于智能手机的童话干预(对照干预)更有效地改善癌症患者的情绪。方法:我们招募了瑞士2家医院的癌症患者,每周进行6次全自动智能手机干预,连续5周,并结合每周面对面的团体身体心理治疗。我们采用了两种基于智能手机的干预,采用了受试者内设计,每天随机分配患者进行身体干预或童话故事。每种干预方式每周进行3次。在这一次要分析中,采用3个层次的混合模型进行估计,并通过3个多维情绪问卷子量表评估情绪,以好坏情绪、清醒和平静为关键指标。此外,研究了视觉模拟量表对存在体验、活力体验和负担体验的影响。结果:根据36名参与者进行的s=732项干预的数据,好坏情绪得到改善(β= 0.27;95% CI 0.062-0.483),参与者变得更平静(β= 0.98;95% CI 0.740-1.211)。在智能手机干预前后,清醒程度没有显著变化(β= 0.17;95% CI -0.081至0.412)。这两种干预类型都是如此。干预类型与好坏情绪变化无交互作用(β=- 0.01;95% CI -0.439 ~ 0.417),镇静(β= 0.22;95% CI -0.228 ~ 0.728)或清醒状态(β= 0.14;95% CI -0.354至0.644)。在场体验(β= 0.34;95% CI 0.271-0.417)和活力(β= 0.35;95% CI 0.268-0.426)从智能手机干预前到干预后增加,而负担体验减少(β=-0.40;95% CI -0.481至0.311)。同样,这些影响在两种干预类型中都存在。干预类型与干预前后存在体验的变化没有显著的交互作用(β=.14;95% CI -0.104 ~ 0.384),活力体验(β= 0.06;95% CI -0.152至0.265),以及负担经历(β=- 0.16;95% CI -0.358至0.017)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,基于智能手机的音频引导身体干预和童话故事都有可能改善癌症幸存者的情绪。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03707548;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03707548.International注册报告标识符(irrid): RR2-10.1186/s40359-019-0357-1。