Capturing the Diversity of Dermatology—What’s in a Name?

Abstract

As research related to skin of color (SOC) in dermatology continues to grow, it is increasingly important to precisely define terminology. The terms ‘SOC’, ‘race’, and ‘ethnicity’ are frequently used to analyze differences in dermatologic disease onset, severity, and outcomes. These terms are used interchangeably, are ill-defined across research studies, and frequently conflate biologic and socially constructed categories. SOC has been thought to represent differing degrees of pigment or melanin in the skin, however skin pigment is quite variable among races and ethnicities. Furthermore, certain individuals with less skin pigment may socially consider themselves to be SOC, while the inverse is also true. Fitzpatrick skin phototype classifications in SOC dermatology, while commonly used as an objective measure of diversity, also present with numerous limitations and inaccuracies. We seek to highlight strengths and weaknesses of the current terminology used in SOC dermatology and recommend a more holistic understanding of reported differences, including a framework reflective of upstream socioeconomic, environmental, and historical factors that may be most relevant to reported associations.