Cognitivism ageing: The Alzheimer conundrum as switched ontology & the potential for a new materialist dementia

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
James Rupert Fletcher
{"title":"Cognitivism ageing: The Alzheimer conundrum as switched ontology & the potential for a new materialist dementia","authors":"James Rupert Fletcher","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Following recent regulatory approvals for anti-Alzheimer's monoclonal antibodies, this paper considers the contemporary role of cognitivism in defining the ontological commitments of dementia research, as well as movements away from cognitivism under the umbrella of 4E cognitive science. 4E cognitive theories, extending cognition into bodies, their environs, and active relations between the two, share potentially fruitful affinities with new materialisms which focus on the co-constitution of matter in intra-action. These semi-overlapping conceptual positions furnish some opportunity for an ontological alternative to longstanding cognitivist commitments, particularly to the isolated brain as a material catalyst for commercial interventions. After outlining mainstream cognitivism and its shortcomings, I explore 4E and new materialism as possibly transformative conceptual schemas for dementia research, a field for which cognitivist imaginings of cognitive decline in later life have profound and often regrettable ramifications. To realise this new materialist dementia, I sketch out a cognitive ontology based on Barad's agential realism. This facilitates a reassessment of the biggest conundrum in dementia research – the lack of neat correlation between (apparently material) neuropathology and (apparently immaterial) cognitive impairment – alongside the continued failure of efforts to develop effective interventions. It also gives social researchers working on cognitive decline in later life an opportunity to reappraise the nature of social science as a response to such phenomena. If cognition and cognitive ageing are reimagined as an emergent characteristic of intra-acting matter, then new materialist social science might be at least as conducive to salutogenic interventions as the neuropsychiatric technoscience that dominates the contemporary dementia research economy despite continual failures. I argue that a new materialist cognitive ontology could help us think beyond an ageing cognitivism and, by extension, beyond the Alzheimer conundrum.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406523000567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Following recent regulatory approvals for anti-Alzheimer's monoclonal antibodies, this paper considers the contemporary role of cognitivism in defining the ontological commitments of dementia research, as well as movements away from cognitivism under the umbrella of 4E cognitive science. 4E cognitive theories, extending cognition into bodies, their environs, and active relations between the two, share potentially fruitful affinities with new materialisms which focus on the co-constitution of matter in intra-action. These semi-overlapping conceptual positions furnish some opportunity for an ontological alternative to longstanding cognitivist commitments, particularly to the isolated brain as a material catalyst for commercial interventions. After outlining mainstream cognitivism and its shortcomings, I explore 4E and new materialism as possibly transformative conceptual schemas for dementia research, a field for which cognitivist imaginings of cognitive decline in later life have profound and often regrettable ramifications. To realise this new materialist dementia, I sketch out a cognitive ontology based on Barad's agential realism. This facilitates a reassessment of the biggest conundrum in dementia research – the lack of neat correlation between (apparently material) neuropathology and (apparently immaterial) cognitive impairment – alongside the continued failure of efforts to develop effective interventions. It also gives social researchers working on cognitive decline in later life an opportunity to reappraise the nature of social science as a response to such phenomena. If cognition and cognitive ageing are reimagined as an emergent characteristic of intra-acting matter, then new materialist social science might be at least as conducive to salutogenic interventions as the neuropsychiatric technoscience that dominates the contemporary dementia research economy despite continual failures. I argue that a new materialist cognitive ontology could help us think beyond an ageing cognitivism and, by extension, beyond the Alzheimer conundrum.

认知主义衰老:阿尔茨海默病难题作为转换的本体论&一种新的唯物主义痴呆症的可能性
在最近对抗阿尔茨海默氏症单克隆抗体的监管批准之后,本文考虑了认知主义在定义痴呆症研究的本体论承诺中的当代作用,以及在4E认知科学的保护伞下远离认知主义的运动。4E认知理论将认知扩展到身体及其环境,以及两者之间的积极关系,与新的物质主义有着潜在的富有成效的相似性,新的物质论侧重于物质在行动中的共同构成。这些半重叠的概念立场为长期的认知主义承诺提供了一些本体论替代方案的机会,特别是将孤立的大脑作为商业干预的物质催化剂。在概述了主流认知主义及其缺点之后,我探索了4E和新唯物主义作为痴呆症研究的可能变革性概念图式,在这个领域,认知主义者对晚年认知能力下降的想象产生了深刻且往往令人遗憾的后果。为了认识到这种新的唯物主义痴呆症,我在巴拉德的代理现实主义基础上勾勒出了一个认知本体论。这有助于重新评估痴呆症研究中最大的难题——(明显物质的)神经病理学和(明显非物质的)认知障碍之间缺乏明确的相关性——以及开发有效干预措施的努力持续失败。它还为研究晚年认知能力下降的社会研究人员提供了一个机会,重新评估社会科学的本质,作为对这些现象的回应。如果认知和认知衰老被重新想象为作用内物质的一个新兴特征,那么新唯物主义社会科学可能至少与神经精神技术科学一样有助于促进干预,尽管神经精神技术学不断失败,但它主导着当代痴呆症研究经济。我认为,一种新的唯物主义认知本体论可以帮助我们超越衰老的认知主义,进而超越阿尔茨海默病难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信