Efficacy of Combined Conjoint Fascial Sheath and Levator Muscle Composite Flap Suspension for Congenital Severe Ptosis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-25 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000010947
Junhu Shi, Zhaochuan Liu, Yadi Li, Lihua Song, Yan Li, Jianwei Yang, Runhui Pang, Hongbin Zhang, Li Xiao, Ping Bai
{"title":"Efficacy of Combined Conjoint Fascial Sheath and Levator Muscle Composite Flap Suspension for Congenital Severe Ptosis.","authors":"Junhu Shi, Zhaochuan Liu, Yadi Li, Lihua Song, Yan Li, Jianwei Yang, Runhui Pang, Hongbin Zhang, Li Xiao, Ping Bai","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000010947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conjoint fascial sheath (CFS) suspension has been gradually recognized and accepted for the treatment of congenital severe blepharoptosis in recent years. To address the problem of postoperative upper eyelid position regression of only CFS suspension, the authors designed and implemented a CFS combined levator muscle (LM) complex flap, and analyzed the surgical efficacy of CFS with LM (CFS+LM) compared with frontalis myofascial flap (FMF) suspension surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with congenital severe ptosis and LM function of 4 mm or less were enrolled. The patients were assigned to either the CFS+LM group or the FMF group, to compare and statistically analyze the postoperative effects of CFS+LM versus FMF suspension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 182 patients (220 eyes) were collected in this study, including 89 patients (103 eyes) in the CFS+LM group and 93 patients (117 eyes) in the FMF group. The full correction rate, patient satisfaction, postoperative upper eyelid excursion, and lagophthalmos in the CFS+LM group were significantly better than those in the FMF group. The eyelid retraction rate was significantly higher in the FMF group than in the CFS+LM group. The complication rate in the CFS+LM group was significantly lower than that in the FMF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CFS+LM suspension had better outcomes than FMF suspension. Considering that the CFS tissue could be weak in patients younger than 5 years and have poor muscle elasticity in patients with LM function less than or equal to 1 mm, FMF suspension is recommended first. For patients older than 5 years with severe ptosis, CFS+LM suspension is recommended.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, III.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"865e-873e"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conjoint fascial sheath (CFS) suspension has been gradually recognized and accepted for the treatment of congenital severe blepharoptosis in recent years. To address the problem of postoperative upper eyelid position regression of only CFS suspension, the authors designed and implemented a CFS combined levator muscle (LM) complex flap, and analyzed the surgical efficacy of CFS with LM (CFS+LM) compared with frontalis myofascial flap (FMF) suspension surgery.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with congenital severe ptosis and LM function of 4 mm or less were enrolled. The patients were assigned to either the CFS+LM group or the FMF group, to compare and statistically analyze the postoperative effects of CFS+LM versus FMF suspension.

Results: Data from 182 patients (220 eyes) were collected in this study, including 89 patients (103 eyes) in the CFS+LM group and 93 patients (117 eyes) in the FMF group. The full correction rate, patient satisfaction, postoperative upper eyelid excursion, and lagophthalmos in the CFS+LM group were significantly better than those in the FMF group. The eyelid retraction rate was significantly higher in the FMF group than in the CFS+LM group. The complication rate in the CFS+LM group was significantly lower than that in the FMF group.

Conclusions: CFS+LM suspension had better outcomes than FMF suspension. Considering that the CFS tissue could be weak in patients younger than 5 years and have poor muscle elasticity in patients with LM function less than or equal to 1 mm, FMF suspension is recommended first. For patients older than 5 years with severe ptosis, CFS+LM suspension is recommended.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.

联合筋膜鞘和提上睑肌复合瓣悬吊术治疗先天性重度上睑下垂的疗效。
背景:联合筋膜鞘(CFS)悬吊术是近年来逐渐被认可和接受的治疗先天性重度睑外翻的方法。为了解决仅用 CFS 悬吊术后上睑位置回缩的问题,我们设计并实施了 CFS 联合提上睑肌(CFS+LM)复合瓣。本研究旨在分析 CFS+LM 和 FMF 悬吊手术的疗效:方法:研究对象为先天性重度上睑下垂且提上睑肌功能≦4 mm的患者。根据手术方法将患者分为 CFS+LM 组和 FMF 组。比较并统计分析 CFS+LM 和 FMF 悬吊术的术后效果:本研究收集了 182 例患者(220 只眼)的数据,其中 CFS+LM 组 89 例(103 只眼),FMF 组 93 例(117 只眼)。CFS+LM组的完全矫正率、患者满意度、术后上眼睑外翻和滞后性明显优于FMF组。FMF 组的眼睑回缩率明显高于 CFS+LM 组。CFS+LM组的并发症发生率明显低于FMF组:结论:CFS+LM 悬液的疗效优于 FMF。考虑到 5 岁以下患者的 CFS 组织可能较弱,且提上睑肌功能≤1 mm 的患者肌肉弹性较差,因此首先推荐使用 FMF 悬吊术。对于 5 岁以上的重度上睑下垂患者,建议使用 CFS+LM 悬吊术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信