Excalibur: A new ensemble method based on an optimal combination of aggregation tests for rare-variant association testing for sequencing data.

IF 4.3 2区 生物学
PLoS Computational Biology Pub Date : 2023-09-14 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011488
Simon Boutry, Raphaël Helaers, Tom Lenaerts, Miikka Vikkula
{"title":"Excalibur: A new ensemble method based on an optimal combination of aggregation tests for rare-variant association testing for sequencing data.","authors":"Simon Boutry,&nbsp;Raphaël Helaers,&nbsp;Tom Lenaerts,&nbsp;Miikka Vikkula","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of high-throughput next-generation sequencing technologies and large-scale genetic association studies produced numerous advances in the biostatistics field. Various aggregation tests, i.e. statistical methods that analyze associations of a trait with multiple markers within a genomic region, have produced a variety of novel discoveries. Notwithstanding their usefulness, there is no single test that fits all needs, each suffering from specific drawbacks. Selecting the right aggregation test, while considering an unknown underlying genetic model of the disease, remains an important challenge. Here we propose a new ensemble method, called Excalibur, based on an optimal combination of 36 aggregation tests created after an in-depth study of the limitations of each test and their impact on the quality of result. Our findings demonstrate the ability of our method to control type I error and illustrate that it offers the best average power across all scenarios. The proposed method allows for novel advances in Whole Exome/Genome sequencing association studies, able to handle a wide range of association models, providing researchers with an optimal aggregation analysis for the genetic regions of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":49688,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Computational Biology","volume":"19 9","pages":"e1011488"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522036/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The development of high-throughput next-generation sequencing technologies and large-scale genetic association studies produced numerous advances in the biostatistics field. Various aggregation tests, i.e. statistical methods that analyze associations of a trait with multiple markers within a genomic region, have produced a variety of novel discoveries. Notwithstanding their usefulness, there is no single test that fits all needs, each suffering from specific drawbacks. Selecting the right aggregation test, while considering an unknown underlying genetic model of the disease, remains an important challenge. Here we propose a new ensemble method, called Excalibur, based on an optimal combination of 36 aggregation tests created after an in-depth study of the limitations of each test and their impact on the quality of result. Our findings demonstrate the ability of our method to control type I error and illustrate that it offers the best average power across all scenarios. The proposed method allows for novel advances in Whole Exome/Genome sequencing association studies, able to handle a wide range of association models, providing researchers with an optimal aggregation analysis for the genetic regions of interest.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Excalibur:一种基于聚集测试最佳组合的新集成方法,用于测序数据的罕见变异关联测试。
高通量下一代测序技术的发展和大规模遗传关联研究在生物统计学领域取得了许多进展。各种聚集测试,即分析一个性状与基因组区域内多个标记的关联的统计方法,已经产生了各种新的发现。尽管它们很有用,但没有一种测试能满足所有需求,每种测试都有特定的缺点。选择正确的聚集性测试,同时考虑疾病的未知潜在遗传模型,仍然是一个重要的挑战。在这里,我们提出了一种新的集成方法,称为Excalibur,该方法基于对每个测试的局限性及其对结果质量的影响进行深入研究后创建的36个聚合测试的最佳组合。我们的发现证明了我们的方法控制I型误差的能力,并说明它在所有情况下都能提供最佳的平均功率。所提出的方法允许全外显子组/基因组测序关联研究取得新进展,能够处理广泛的关联模型,为研究人员提供感兴趣的遗传区域的最佳聚集分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Computational Biology
PLoS Computational Biology 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
820
期刊介绍: PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales—from molecules and cells, to patient populations and ecosystems—through the application of computational methods. Readers include life and computational scientists, who can take the important findings presented here to the next level of discovery. Research articles must be declared as belonging to a relevant section. More information about the sections can be found in the submission guidelines. Research articles should model aspects of biological systems, demonstrate both methodological and scientific novelty, and provide profound new biological insights. Generally, reliability and significance of biological discovery through computation should be validated and enriched by experimental studies. Inclusion of experimental validation is not required for publication, but should be referenced where possible. Inclusion of experimental validation of a modest biological discovery through computation does not render a manuscript suitable for PLOS Computational Biology. Research articles specifically designated as Methods papers should describe outstanding methods of exceptional importance that have been shown, or have the promise to provide new biological insights. The method must already be widely adopted, or have the promise of wide adoption by a broad community of users. Enhancements to existing published methods will only be considered if those enhancements bring exceptional new capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信