Ultrasound-Guided Pectoserratus Plane Block and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: A Comparative Study.

Marek Szamborski, Jarosław Janc, Patrycja Leśnik, Artur Milnerowicz, Dariusz Jagielski, Lidia Łysenko
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Pectoserratus Plane Block and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Marek Szamborski,&nbsp;Jarosław Janc,&nbsp;Patrycja Leśnik,&nbsp;Artur Milnerowicz,&nbsp;Dariusz Jagielski,&nbsp;Lidia Łysenko","doi":"10.12659/MSM.940541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND The combination of pectoserratus plane block (PSP) and superficial serratus anterior plane block (S-SAP) was established to reduce the risk of general anesthesia for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation in patients with high operative risk (American Society of Anesthesiologistsgrade III or IV). This study compared outcomes from ultrasound-guided PSP and S-SAP in 16 patients requiring a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) at a single center in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS A group of 16 patients with ASA grade III and IV qualified for S-ICD implantation was included. The pain assessment using numerical rating scale (NRS), patient's comfort using Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15), the operator's satisfaction using Operator's Comfort Scale, adverse event occurrence, and the parameters' stability were evaluated. RESULTS The mean volume of the local anesthetics mixture of PSP block was 19.4 mL; S-SAP was 34.7 mL (mean total volume, 54.1 mL). The mean duration of the block was 21.3 min; the mean time of the S-ICD implantation was 108.4 min. Neither circulatory nor respiratory instability was observed. In 8 patients (50%), non-opioid analgesics were administered intraoperatively; in 11 patients (69%), fentanyl bolus ≤200 μg was administered. The intraoperative NRS score was low (max 2 points); NRS 24 h after the procedure was low (max 4 points). The mean value of QoR-15 was 133.9 points. CONCLUSIONS S-SAP combined with PSP is feasible and safe in providing anesthesia/analgesia during S-ICD implantation and showed good effects in a group of patients with high operative risk (ASA III or IV).</p>","PeriodicalId":18276,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","volume":"29 ","pages":"e940541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/f6/medscimonit-29-e940541.PMC10368141.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.940541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND The combination of pectoserratus plane block (PSP) and superficial serratus anterior plane block (S-SAP) was established to reduce the risk of general anesthesia for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation in patients with high operative risk (American Society of Anesthesiologistsgrade III or IV). This study compared outcomes from ultrasound-guided PSP and S-SAP in 16 patients requiring a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) at a single center in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS A group of 16 patients with ASA grade III and IV qualified for S-ICD implantation was included. The pain assessment using numerical rating scale (NRS), patient's comfort using Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15), the operator's satisfaction using Operator's Comfort Scale, adverse event occurrence, and the parameters' stability were evaluated. RESULTS The mean volume of the local anesthetics mixture of PSP block was 19.4 mL; S-SAP was 34.7 mL (mean total volume, 54.1 mL). The mean duration of the block was 21.3 min; the mean time of the S-ICD implantation was 108.4 min. Neither circulatory nor respiratory instability was observed. In 8 patients (50%), non-opioid analgesics were administered intraoperatively; in 11 patients (69%), fentanyl bolus ≤200 μg was administered. The intraoperative NRS score was low (max 2 points); NRS 24 h after the procedure was low (max 4 points). The mean value of QoR-15 was 133.9 points. CONCLUSIONS S-SAP combined with PSP is feasible and safe in providing anesthesia/analgesia during S-ICD implantation and showed good effects in a group of patients with high operative risk (ASA III or IV).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超声引导下胸锯肌平面阻滞与表浅锯肌前平面阻滞用于皮下植入式心律转复除颤器的比较研究。
背景:建立胸锯肌平面阻滞(PSP)和浅锯肌前平面阻滞(S-SAP)联合用于降低高手术风险患者皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)植入式全身麻醉的风险(美国麻醉学会III级或IV级)。本研究比较了超声引导下PSP和S-SAP对16例需要皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)患者的结果波兰的一个中心。材料与方法入选ASA III级和IV级符合S-ICD植入条件的患者16例。采用数值评定量表(NRS)评价疼痛,采用康复质量-15 (QoR-15)评价患者舒适度,采用操作者舒适度量表评价操作者满意度、不良事件发生情况及参数稳定性。结果局麻药PSP阻滞合剂的平均体积为19.4 mL;S-SAP为34.7 mL(平均总容积54.1 mL)。阻滞的平均持续时间为21.3 min;S-ICD植入平均时间108.4 min,未见呼吸、循环不稳定。8例患者(50%)术中给予非阿片类镇痛药;11例患者(69%)给予芬太尼丸≤200 μg。术中NRS评分低(最高2分);术后24 h NRS较低(最大4分)。QoR-15的平均值为133.9分。结论S-SAP联合PSP在S-ICD植入术中提供麻醉/镇痛是可行和安全的,在ASA III或IV级手术风险高的患者组中效果良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信