Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in Tunisia.

IF 1.7 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Khaoula Ben Ismail, Fatma Essafi, Imen Talik, Najla Ben Slimene, Ines Sdiri, Boudour Ben Dhia, Takoua Merhbene
{"title":"Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in Tunisia.","authors":"Khaoula Ben Ismail,&nbsp;Fatma Essafi,&nbsp;Imen Talik,&nbsp;Najla Ben Slimene,&nbsp;Ines Sdiri,&nbsp;Boudour Ben Dhia,&nbsp;Takoua Merhbene","doi":"10.4266/acc.2023.00591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we explored whether awake prone position (PP) can impact prognosis of severe hypoxemia coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study of severe, critically ill adult COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Patients were divided into two groups: group G1, patients who benefited from a vigilant and effective PP (>4 hours minimum/24) and group G2, control group. We compared demographic, clinical, paraclinical and evolutionary data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred forty-nine patients were hospitalized during the study period, 273 met the inclusion criteria. PP was performed in 192 patients (70.3%). The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, clinical severity and modalities of oxygenation at intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The mean PaO2/ FIO2 ratios were 141 and 128 mm Hg, respectively (P=0.07). The computed tomography scan was comparable with a critical >75% in 48.5% (G1) versus 54.2% (G2). The median duration of the daily PP session was 13±7 hours per day. The average duration of spontaneous PP days was 7 days (4-19). Use of invasive ventilation was lower in the G1 group (27% vs. 56%, P=0.002). Healthcare-associated infections were significantly lower in G1 (42.1% vs. 82%, P=0.01). Duration of total mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay were comparable between the two groups. Mortality was significantly higher in G2 (64% vs. 28%, P=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study confirmed that awake PP can improve prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this result.</p>","PeriodicalId":44118,"journal":{"name":"Acute and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b1/97/acc-2023-00591.PMC10497894.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2023.00591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this study, we explored whether awake prone position (PP) can impact prognosis of severe hypoxemia coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study of severe, critically ill adult COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Patients were divided into two groups: group G1, patients who benefited from a vigilant and effective PP (>4 hours minimum/24) and group G2, control group. We compared demographic, clinical, paraclinical and evolutionary data.

Results: Three hundred forty-nine patients were hospitalized during the study period, 273 met the inclusion criteria. PP was performed in 192 patients (70.3%). The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, clinical severity and modalities of oxygenation at intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The mean PaO2/ FIO2 ratios were 141 and 128 mm Hg, respectively (P=0.07). The computed tomography scan was comparable with a critical >75% in 48.5% (G1) versus 54.2% (G2). The median duration of the daily PP session was 13±7 hours per day. The average duration of spontaneous PP days was 7 days (4-19). Use of invasive ventilation was lower in the G1 group (27% vs. 56%, P=0.002). Healthcare-associated infections were significantly lower in G1 (42.1% vs. 82%, P=0.01). Duration of total mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay were comparable between the two groups. Mortality was significantly higher in G2 (64% vs. 28%, P=0.02).

Conclusions: Our study confirmed that awake PP can improve prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this result.

Abstract Image

突尼斯醒卧位治疗COVID-19急性低氧性呼吸衰竭
背景:本研究探讨清醒俯卧位(PP)是否会影响严重低氧血症冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)患者的预后。方法:对重症监护病房收治的成人COVID-19重症、危重症患者进行前瞻性观察研究。患者分为两组:G1组,受益于警惕性和有效的PP(≥4小时/24)的患者;G2组,对照组。我们比较了人口学、临床、临床辅助和进化数据。结果:研究期间共有349例患者住院,其中273例符合纳入标准。192例(70.3%)患者行PP手术。两组在人口统计学特征、临床严重程度和重症监护病房(ICU)入院时的氧合方式方面具有可比性。平均PaO2/ FIO2比值分别为141和128 mm Hg (P=0.07)。计算机断层扫描在48.5% (G1)和54.2% (G2)中具有可比性,临界值>75%。每日PP疗程的中位持续时间为每天13±7小时。自发性PP天数平均为7 d(4-19)。G1组有创通气使用率较低(27%比56%,P=0.002)。G1期医疗相关感染明显降低(42.1%比82%,P=0.01)。两组患者全机械通气时间和ICU住院时间具有可比性。G2组死亡率显著增高(64% vs. 28%, P=0.02)。结论:本研究证实清醒PP可改善COVID-19患者预后。需要随机对照试验来证实这一结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute and Critical Care
Acute and Critical Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信