{"title":"Clinical performance of various bonding agents in noncarious cervical defects.","authors":"Aashish Handa, Kanwalpreet Kaur Bhullar, Diksha Batra, Rajdeep Singh Brar, Mallika Khanna, Shantun Malhotra","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_265_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Four bonding agents and a composite restorative resin were evaluated in patients having noncarious cervical defects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This clinical trial was conducted in patients having at least 4 noncarious cervical defects in posterior teeth evaluating the clinical effectiveness in relation to retention, discoloration at margins, and postoperative sensitivity of 5<sup>th</sup>, 6<sup>th</sup>, 7<sup>th</sup>, and 8<sup>th</sup> generations of bonding agents over a period of baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Data were recorded and put into statistical analysis using Chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 24 months, retention rate was found out to be 92.6% for the 7<sup>th</sup> generation which was better than 5<sup>th</sup> (66.7%) and 6<sup>th</sup> (70.4%) generation whereas significant marginal discoloration was seen at 6 months follow-up in which 5<sup>th</sup> generation showed maximum results. However, all the four generations have an equal score of postoperative sensitivity at all the time intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 7<sup>th</sup> generation adhesives performed better than other generations in terms of retention. Changes in marginal discoloration were detected at 6 months with maximum score in 5<sup>th</sup> generation adhesives.</p>","PeriodicalId":38892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","volume":"26 3","pages":"271-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_265_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Four bonding agents and a composite restorative resin were evaluated in patients having noncarious cervical defects.
Materials and methods: This clinical trial was conducted in patients having at least 4 noncarious cervical defects in posterior teeth evaluating the clinical effectiveness in relation to retention, discoloration at margins, and postoperative sensitivity of 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th generations of bonding agents over a period of baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.
Statistical analysis: Data were recorded and put into statistical analysis using Chi-square tests.
Results: At 24 months, retention rate was found out to be 92.6% for the 7th generation which was better than 5th (66.7%) and 6th (70.4%) generation whereas significant marginal discoloration was seen at 6 months follow-up in which 5th generation showed maximum results. However, all the four generations have an equal score of postoperative sensitivity at all the time intervals.
Conclusions: The 7th generation adhesives performed better than other generations in terms of retention. Changes in marginal discoloration were detected at 6 months with maximum score in 5th generation adhesives.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Conservative Dentistry (ISSN - 0972-0707) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (IACDE). Our journal publishes scientific articles, case reports, short communications, invited reviews and comparative studies evaluating materials and methods in the fields of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics. J Conserv Dent has a diverse readership that includes full-time clinicians, full-time academicians, residents, students and scientists. Effective communication with this diverse readership requires careful attention to writing style.