Parent experience of advance care planning: reconstructing meaning - grounded theory.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Helen Elizabeth Bennett, Sue Duke, Alison Richardson
{"title":"Parent experience of advance care planning: reconstructing meaning - grounded theory.","authors":"Helen Elizabeth Bennett, Sue Duke, Alison Richardson","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-004348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Parents have unique experience of caring for their child with a life-limiting illness and significant insight into the experience of advance care planning. However, little is known about how they experience and manage this process. Our objective was to understand parents' experience of advance care planning for their child.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collected through semistructured interviews and documents using a constructivist and situational grounded theory approach. Parents with experience of end-of-life decisions or advance care planning for a child (age 0-17 years) with a life-limiting condition or life-threatening condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 parents participated; 11 interviews were undertaken with analysis of 9 advance care plans. Parents were interviewed separately (n=9) or together (n=2).Overarching and inter-related categories, realisation, reconciling multiple tensions and building confidence and asserting control explained the actions and processes of parents' experience of advance care planning. The arising theory, reconstructing meaning through advance care planning, describes how the process of advance care planning, enables parents to make 'good' decisions in complex medical situations and despite the emotional distress, has therapeutic value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms parents want to engage in advance care planning, use the process to continuously reorientate their values alongside treatment decisions and that offers a therapeutic value not previously recognised. This requires healthcare professionals to reframe their approach to advance care planning conversations valuing parents' voices and desire for a sense of control and empowering them to make future decisions that offer hope and build resilience to face the future death of their child.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"e2726-e2736"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-004348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Parents have unique experience of caring for their child with a life-limiting illness and significant insight into the experience of advance care planning. However, little is known about how they experience and manage this process. Our objective was to understand parents' experience of advance care planning for their child.

Methods: Data collected through semistructured interviews and documents using a constructivist and situational grounded theory approach. Parents with experience of end-of-life decisions or advance care planning for a child (age 0-17 years) with a life-limiting condition or life-threatening condition.

Results: 13 parents participated; 11 interviews were undertaken with analysis of 9 advance care plans. Parents were interviewed separately (n=9) or together (n=2).Overarching and inter-related categories, realisation, reconciling multiple tensions and building confidence and asserting control explained the actions and processes of parents' experience of advance care planning. The arising theory, reconstructing meaning through advance care planning, describes how the process of advance care planning, enables parents to make 'good' decisions in complex medical situations and despite the emotional distress, has therapeutic value.

Conclusion: This study confirms parents want to engage in advance care planning, use the process to continuously reorientate their values alongside treatment decisions and that offers a therapeutic value not previously recognised. This requires healthcare professionals to reframe their approach to advance care planning conversations valuing parents' voices and desire for a sense of control and empowering them to make future decisions that offer hope and build resilience to face the future death of their child.

预先照护计划的父母经验:重建意义基础理论。
目的:父母在照顾患有限制生命的疾病的孩子方面有独特的经验,并且对预先护理计划的经验有重要的见解。然而,人们对它们如何经历和管理这一过程知之甚少。我们的目的是了解父母对他们孩子的预先护理计划的经验。方法:采用建构主义和情境扎根理论的方法,通过半结构化访谈和文献收集数据。对患有限制生命或威胁生命疾病的儿童(0-17岁)有临终决定或预先护理计划经验的父母。结果:13名家长参与;进行了11次访谈,分析了9个预先护理计划。家长分别接受采访(n=9)或一起接受采访(n=2)。总体和相互关联的类别,实现,协调多种紧张关系,建立信心和主张控制解释了父母在预先护理计划中的行为和过程。新出现的理论,通过预先护理计划重建意义,描述了预先护理计划的过程,如何使父母在复杂的医疗情况下做出“正确”的决定,尽管情绪困扰,具有治疗价值。结论:这项研究证实了父母想要参与预先的护理计划,利用这个过程不断地重新定位他们的价值观和治疗决策,这提供了以前没有认识到的治疗价值。这要求医疗保健专业人员重新构建他们的方法,以推进护理计划对话,重视父母的声音和对控制感的渴望,并授权他们做出未来的决定,这些决定提供了希望,并建立了面对孩子未来死亡的韧性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信