Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Very Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Yoshikuni Kobayashi, Masaki Izumo, Kazuaki Okuyama, Nina Uenomachi, Tatsuro Shoji, Takahiko Kai, Taishi Okuno, Yukio Sato, Shingo Kuwata, Masashi Koga, Yuki Ishibashi, Yasuhiro Tanabe, Takeshi Miyairi, Yoshihiro J Akashi
{"title":"Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Very Severe Aortic Stenosis.","authors":"Yoshikuni Kobayashi,&nbsp;Masaki Izumo,&nbsp;Kazuaki Okuyama,&nbsp;Nina Uenomachi,&nbsp;Tatsuro Shoji,&nbsp;Takahiko Kai,&nbsp;Taishi Okuno,&nbsp;Yukio Sato,&nbsp;Shingo Kuwata,&nbsp;Masashi Koga,&nbsp;Yuki Ishibashi,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Tanabe,&nbsp;Takeshi Miyairi,&nbsp;Yoshihiro J Akashi","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Very severe aortic stenosis (AS) has a poor prognosis even in asymptomatic patients, and asymptomatic very severe AS is a Class IIa indication for aortic valve replacement, although the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for very severe AS is not well-established. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> This study included 366 patients undergoing TAVI at a single center, with 85 and 281 patients in the very severe AS (peak velocity ≥5 m/s or mean pressure gradient (PG) ≥60 mmHg) and severe AS groups, respectively. Procedural and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. The calcium scores were significantly higher in the very severe AS group (2,864.5 vs. 1,405.8 arbitrary units [AU] (P<0.001). Although the patient-prosthesis mismatch rate was higher in the very severe AS group (38.3% vs. 25.7%; P=0.029), there was no significant difference in the early safety and clinical efficacy between the groups (16.5% vs. 17.1% and 12.0% vs. 18.9%, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality at 1 year (4.8% vs. 9.8%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Despite a higher incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in those with very severe AS, the procedural and clinical outcomes were comparable to those in patients with severe AS. TAVI may be a reasonable treatment option for very severe AS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10276,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Reports","volume":"5 9","pages":"358-364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/40/b2/circrep-5-358.PMC10483111.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Very severe aortic stenosis (AS) has a poor prognosis even in asymptomatic patients, and asymptomatic very severe AS is a Class IIa indication for aortic valve replacement, although the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for very severe AS is not well-established. Methods and Results: This study included 366 patients undergoing TAVI at a single center, with 85 and 281 patients in the very severe AS (peak velocity ≥5 m/s or mean pressure gradient (PG) ≥60 mmHg) and severe AS groups, respectively. Procedural and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared between groups. The calcium scores were significantly higher in the very severe AS group (2,864.5 vs. 1,405.8 arbitrary units [AU] (P<0.001). Although the patient-prosthesis mismatch rate was higher in the very severe AS group (38.3% vs. 25.7%; P=0.029), there was no significant difference in the early safety and clinical efficacy between the groups (16.5% vs. 17.1% and 12.0% vs. 18.9%, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality at 1 year (4.8% vs. 9.8%). Conclusions: Despite a higher incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in those with very severe AS, the procedural and clinical outcomes were comparable to those in patients with severe AS. TAVI may be a reasonable treatment option for very severe AS.

Abstract Image

经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的可行性。
背景:非常严重的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)即使在无症状的患者中预后也很差,无症状的非常严重的AS是主动脉瓣置换术的IIa类指征,尽管经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗非常严重AS的安全性和有效性尚不明确。方法与结果:本研究纳入366例单中心TAVI患者,其中极重度AS(峰值流速≥5 m/s或平均压力梯度(PG)≥60 mmHg)组85例和重度AS组281例。比较两组1年随访的程序和临床结果。非常严重AS组的钙评分明显更高(2864.5 vs 1405.8任意单位[AU])。结论:尽管非常严重AS患者假体与患者不匹配的发生率更高,但手术和临床结果与严重AS患者相当。TAVI可能是非常严重的AS的合理治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信