Comparing cigarette-cue attentional bias between people with HIV/AIDS and people with opioid use disorder who smoke.

IF 2.4 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Gopalkumar Rakesh, Joseph L Alcorn, Rebika Khanal, Seth S Himelhoch, Craig R Rush
{"title":"Comparing cigarette-cue attentional bias between people with HIV/AIDS and people with opioid use disorder who smoke.","authors":"Gopalkumar Rakesh,&nbsp;Joseph L Alcorn,&nbsp;Rebika Khanal,&nbsp;Seth S Himelhoch,&nbsp;Craig R Rush","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2255028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Special populations like people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) and people with opioid use disorder (OUD) smoke tobacco cigarettes at rates three to four times greater than the general population. Patients with tobacco use disorder exhibit attentional bias (AB) for cigarette cues. Eye tracking can quantify this bias by measuring fixation time (FT) on cigarette and matched neutral cues, to calculate an AB score. Although previous studies have measured this bias in people who smoke without any other comorbid conditions, no study, to our knowledge, has measured or compared this bias in special populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed exploratory analyses on eye tracking data collected in two separate randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (NCT05049460, NCT05295953). We compared FT and cigarette-cue AB score (measured by subtracting FT on neutral cues from FT on cigarette cues) between PLWHA and people with OUD who smoke, using a visual probe task and Tobii Pro Fusion eye tracker. We used two cigarette cue types, one encompassing people smoking cigarettes and the other consisting of cigarette paraphernalia. We used two cue presentation times, 1000 and 2000 milliseconds (ms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cues of people smoking cigarettes elicited greater AB than cues of cigarette paraphernalia across both subject groups when cues were presented for 2000 ms, but not 1000 ms. PLWHA who smoke exhibited greater AB for cues of people smoking cigarettes than cigarette paraphernalia when presented for 2000 ms compared to people with OUD who smoke.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We use cigarette-cue AB to quantify craving and cigarette consumption in two populations smoking at elevated rates. The addition of social cues potentiates cigarette cue AB, based on cue type and stimulus presentation time. Understanding the neurobiology of this relationship can help design novel smoking cessation treatments that target AB and prevent relapse in these populations with suboptimal response to smoking cessation treatments.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical trials that provided the data for post hoc analyses are NCT05049460 and NCT05295953.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e6/17/RHPB_11_2255028.PMC10486286.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2023.2255028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Special populations like people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) and people with opioid use disorder (OUD) smoke tobacco cigarettes at rates three to four times greater than the general population. Patients with tobacco use disorder exhibit attentional bias (AB) for cigarette cues. Eye tracking can quantify this bias by measuring fixation time (FT) on cigarette and matched neutral cues, to calculate an AB score. Although previous studies have measured this bias in people who smoke without any other comorbid conditions, no study, to our knowledge, has measured or compared this bias in special populations.

Methods: We performed exploratory analyses on eye tracking data collected in two separate randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (NCT05049460, NCT05295953). We compared FT and cigarette-cue AB score (measured by subtracting FT on neutral cues from FT on cigarette cues) between PLWHA and people with OUD who smoke, using a visual probe task and Tobii Pro Fusion eye tracker. We used two cigarette cue types, one encompassing people smoking cigarettes and the other consisting of cigarette paraphernalia. We used two cue presentation times, 1000 and 2000 milliseconds (ms).

Results: Cues of people smoking cigarettes elicited greater AB than cues of cigarette paraphernalia across both subject groups when cues were presented for 2000 ms, but not 1000 ms. PLWHA who smoke exhibited greater AB for cues of people smoking cigarettes than cigarette paraphernalia when presented for 2000 ms compared to people with OUD who smoke.

Conclusion: We use cigarette-cue AB to quantify craving and cigarette consumption in two populations smoking at elevated rates. The addition of social cues potentiates cigarette cue AB, based on cue type and stimulus presentation time. Understanding the neurobiology of this relationship can help design novel smoking cessation treatments that target AB and prevent relapse in these populations with suboptimal response to smoking cessation treatments.

Trial registration: Clinical trials that provided the data for post hoc analyses are NCT05049460 and NCT05295953.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

比较艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者和吸烟的阿片类药物使用障碍患者的香烟提示注意偏差。
背景:艾滋病毒/艾滋病(PLWHA)感染者和阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者等特殊人群的吸烟率是一般人群的三到四倍。烟草使用障碍患者对香烟线索表现出注意偏倚(AB)。眼动追踪可以通过测量对香烟和匹配的中性线索的注视时间(FT)来量化这种偏见,从而计算出AB分。虽然以前的研究已经测量了没有任何其他共病的吸烟者的这种偏差,但据我们所知,没有研究测量或比较了特殊人群的这种偏差。方法:对两项独立随机临床试验(NCT05049460, NCT05295953)的眼动追踪数据进行探索性分析。我们使用视觉探测任务和Tobii Pro Fusion眼动仪比较了PLWHA和吸烟的OUD患者之间的FT和香烟线索AB评分(通过从香烟线索上的FT减去中性线索上的FT来测量)。我们使用了两种香烟线索类型,一种包括吸烟的人,另一种包括香烟用具。我们使用了两个提示呈现时间,1000和2000毫秒(ms)。结果:当提示时间为2000 ms,而不是1000 ms时,两组受试者吸烟的提示比香烟用具的提示引起的AB更大。与吸烟的OUD患者相比,吸烟的PLWHA患者在2000毫秒内对吸烟的人的提示表现出更大的AB,而不是香烟用具。结论:我们使用香烟提示AB来量化两个高吸烟率人群的渴望和香烟消费。根据提示类型和刺激呈现时间的不同,社会提示的加入增强了香烟提示AB。了解这种关系的神经生物学可以帮助设计针对AB的新型戒烟治疗方法,并防止这些对戒烟治疗反应不佳的人群复发。试验注册:为事后分析提供数据的临床试验为NCT05049460和NCT05295953。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
57
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信