Impact of Gender and Age on the Prognosis of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: a Retrospective Analysis Based on SEER.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Dan Zhang, Jianing Tang, Deguang Kong, Qiuxia Cui, Kun Wang, Yan Gong, Gaosong Wu
{"title":"Impact of Gender and Age on the Prognosis of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: a Retrospective Analysis Based on SEER.","authors":"Dan Zhang,&nbsp;Jianing Tang,&nbsp;Deguang Kong,&nbsp;Qiuxia Cui,&nbsp;Kun Wang,&nbsp;Yan Gong,&nbsp;Gaosong Wu","doi":"10.1007/s12672-018-0340-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incidence of thyroid cancer in females is significantly higher than that in males; however, females are more likely to have more favorable outcomes. We aimed to determine the characteristics of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) subtypes in males and females, and to compare their clinical behavior and survival. A total of 68,337 cases were recruited from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. The disease-specific survival (DSS) of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) and follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) were similar to that of classical variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (CPTC) in male patients (FVPTC vs. CPTC, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.947, P = 0.776; FTC vs. CPTC, aHR = 1.512, P = 0.104). In premenopausal female (< 55 years old), FVPTC had better DSS than CPTC (aHR = 0.321, P = 0.038) while FTC had worse DSS than CPTC (aHR = 3.272, P = 0.013); in postmenopausal female, FTC had poorer prognosis than CPTC (aHR = 2.145, P = 0.002), no statistical difference was found between CPTC and FVPTC (aHR = 0.724, P = 0.087). For patients younger than 55 years, women had significantly better DSS compared with men with CPTC (aHR = 0.376, P < 0.001) and FVPTC (aHR = 0.102, P < 0.001). However, no difference was observed in patients older than 55 years. Interestingly, outcomes of FTC were not affected by gender in patients of all ages. These results suggested that different clinical behaviors and outcomes of DTC subtypes should be considered in patients with different genders.</p>","PeriodicalId":13060,"journal":{"name":"Hormones & Cancer","volume":"9 5","pages":"361-370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12672-018-0340-y","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormones & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-018-0340-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

The incidence of thyroid cancer in females is significantly higher than that in males; however, females are more likely to have more favorable outcomes. We aimed to determine the characteristics of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) subtypes in males and females, and to compare their clinical behavior and survival. A total of 68,337 cases were recruited from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. The disease-specific survival (DSS) of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) and follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) were similar to that of classical variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (CPTC) in male patients (FVPTC vs. CPTC, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.947, P = 0.776; FTC vs. CPTC, aHR = 1.512, P = 0.104). In premenopausal female (< 55 years old), FVPTC had better DSS than CPTC (aHR = 0.321, P = 0.038) while FTC had worse DSS than CPTC (aHR = 3.272, P = 0.013); in postmenopausal female, FTC had poorer prognosis than CPTC (aHR = 2.145, P = 0.002), no statistical difference was found between CPTC and FVPTC (aHR = 0.724, P = 0.087). For patients younger than 55 years, women had significantly better DSS compared with men with CPTC (aHR = 0.376, P < 0.001) and FVPTC (aHR = 0.102, P < 0.001). However, no difference was observed in patients older than 55 years. Interestingly, outcomes of FTC were not affected by gender in patients of all ages. These results suggested that different clinical behaviors and outcomes of DTC subtypes should be considered in patients with different genders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

性别和年龄对分化型甲状腺癌预后的影响:基于SEER的回顾性分析
女性甲状腺癌的发病率明显高于男性;然而,女性更有可能获得更有利的结果。我们旨在确定男性和女性分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)亚型的特征,并比较其临床行为和生存率。从国家癌症研究所的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)项目中共招募了68,337例病例。男性滤泡变异型甲状腺乳头状癌(FVPTC)和滤泡型甲状腺癌(FTC)的疾病特异性生存期(DSS)与经典变异型甲状腺乳头状癌(CPTC)相似(FVPTC vs. CPTC,校正风险比(aHR) = 0.947, P = 0.776;FTC vs. CPTC, aHR = 1.512, P = 0.104)。绝经前女性(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hormones & Cancer
Hormones & Cancer ONCOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Hormones and Cancer is a unique multidisciplinary translational journal featuring basic science, pre-clinical, epidemiological, and clinical research papers. It covers all aspects of the interface of Endocrinology and Oncology. Thus, the journal covers two main areas of research: Endocrine tumors (benign & malignant tumors of hormone secreting endocrine organs) and the effects of hormones on any type of tumor. We welcome all types of studies related to these fields, but our particular attention is on translational aspects of research. In addition to basic, pre-clinical, and epidemiological studies, we encourage submission of clinical studies including those that comprise small series of tumors in rare endocrine neoplasias and/or negative or confirmatory results provided that they significantly enhance our understanding of endocrine aspects of oncology. The journal does not publish case studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信