What does the general public know about palliative care? A population-based survey.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Marjolein Matthys, Kenneth Chambaere, Kim Beernaert, Joachim Cohen, Leen Van Brussel, Benedicte Deforche, Bert Quintiens, Luc Deliens, Naomi Dhollander
{"title":"What does the general public know about palliative care? A population-based survey.","authors":"Marjolein Matthys, Kenneth Chambaere, Kim Beernaert, Joachim Cohen, Leen Van Brussel, Benedicte Deforche, Bert Quintiens, Luc Deliens, Naomi Dhollander","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-004384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The need for public education on palliative care has been widely argued for. To develop effective educational strategies, a stronger evidence base is needed on what exactly is known and unknown about palliative care as well as what the differences are between subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional population-based survey. Mail questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 4400 citizens (aged ≥16 years) within 4 municipalities in Flanders, Belgium. The Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS) was used to measure knowledge. Associations between knowledge and sociodemographics and various experiential factors were tested, as well as the congruence between actual and self-perceived knowledge scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response was obtained from 2008 (45.6%) citizens. The mean PaCKS score was 7.87 (SD 3.41; range 0-13) with the highest proportion (84.7%) correctly answering that palliative care is not specifically for older adults and the lowest (32.1%) correctly answering that improving the ability to participate in daily life is a palliative care goal. Being aged between 30 and 59, non-religious, more highly educated, having professional healthcare experience and knowing palliative care through personal experience were significantly associated with higher knowledge, while sex and informal caregiving experience were not. 52.4% self-perceived their knowledge as lower than it actually was.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the general public seems to be familiar with some basic concepts of palliative care, several key aspects remain unknown. Educational strategies, with suggested potential for community-based and experience-based approaches, may need to focus specifically on these aspects and not just on the broader palliative care concept.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-004384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The need for public education on palliative care has been widely argued for. To develop effective educational strategies, a stronger evidence base is needed on what exactly is known and unknown about palliative care as well as what the differences are between subgroups.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional population-based survey. Mail questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 4400 citizens (aged ≥16 years) within 4 municipalities in Flanders, Belgium. The Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS) was used to measure knowledge. Associations between knowledge and sociodemographics and various experiential factors were tested, as well as the congruence between actual and self-perceived knowledge scores.

Results: Response was obtained from 2008 (45.6%) citizens. The mean PaCKS score was 7.87 (SD 3.41; range 0-13) with the highest proportion (84.7%) correctly answering that palliative care is not specifically for older adults and the lowest (32.1%) correctly answering that improving the ability to participate in daily life is a palliative care goal. Being aged between 30 and 59, non-religious, more highly educated, having professional healthcare experience and knowing palliative care through personal experience were significantly associated with higher knowledge, while sex and informal caregiving experience were not. 52.4% self-perceived their knowledge as lower than it actually was.

Conclusions: While the general public seems to be familiar with some basic concepts of palliative care, several key aspects remain unknown. Educational strategies, with suggested potential for community-based and experience-based approaches, may need to focus specifically on these aspects and not just on the broader palliative care concept.

公众对姑息关怀了解多少?一项基于人口的调查。
目的:关于姑息关怀的公众教育的必要性已被广泛论证。为了制定有效的教育策略,我们需要更多的证据来证明人们对姑息关怀的了解和不了解,以及不同人群之间的差异:我们进行了一项基于人群的横断面调查。我们向比利时佛兰德斯4个城市的4400名市民(年龄≥16岁)随机抽样邮寄了调查问卷。采用姑息关怀知识量表(PaCKS)来测量知识。测试了知识与社会人口统计学和各种经验因素之间的关联,以及实际知识得分与自我认知得分之间的一致性:2008 名公民(45.6%)做出了回答。PaCKS的平均得分为7.87分(标准差为3.41分;范围为0-13分),正确回答姑息关怀并非专门针对老年人的比例最高(84.7%),正确回答提高参与日常生活的能力是姑息关怀目标的比例最低(32.1%)。年龄在 30 岁至 59 岁之间、无宗教信仰、受教育程度较高、具有专业医疗保健经验以及通过个人经历了解姑息关怀与较高的知识水平显著相关,而性别和非正式护理经验则不相关。52.4%的人认为自己的知识水平低于实际水平:结论:尽管公众似乎对姑息关怀的一些基本概念比较熟悉,但仍有几个关键方面不为人知。建议采取以社区为基础、以经验为基础的教育策略,可能需要特别关注这些方面,而不仅仅是更广泛的姑息关怀概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信