Static Non-articulating Knee Spacers Are Associated with a High Degree of Morbidity in Challenging Clinical Scenarios.

Emanuel C Haug, Jeremy T Hines, Benjamin Dalkin, Patrick J Dunne, Wendy M Novicoff, Lucian C Warth, R Michael Meneghini, James A Browne
{"title":"Static Non-articulating Knee Spacers Are Associated with a High Degree of Morbidity in Challenging Clinical Scenarios.","authors":"Emanuel C Haug,&nbsp;Jeremy T Hines,&nbsp;Benjamin Dalkin,&nbsp;Patrick J Dunne,&nbsp;Wendy M Novicoff,&nbsp;Lucian C Warth,&nbsp;R Michael Meneghini,&nbsp;James A Browne","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The morbidity associated with the use of static non-articulating knee spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in challenging clinical scenarios has not been well described. From 2011-2019, 63 molded block static spacers were utilized at two academic institutions for the treatment of PJI with associated severe soft tissue compromise (59%), collateral ligament deficiency (49%), extensor mechanism compromise (48%), or type 3 bone defects (44%). Complications and outcomes were assessed. Complications with the use of static spacers were common and included further bone loss (46%), spacer migration (16%), extensor mechanism compromise (16%), cast or related soft tissue injuries (16%), fracture (13%), and spacer breakage (3%). Ultimately, 22% of patients underwent amputation. Patient variables such as age and body mass index were not associated with outcomes. Static knee spacers are associated with substantial morbidity in challenging clinical scenarios and alternatives may need to be considered. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(2):122-126, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":17143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"32 2","pages":"122-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The morbidity associated with the use of static non-articulating knee spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in challenging clinical scenarios has not been well described. From 2011-2019, 63 molded block static spacers were utilized at two academic institutions for the treatment of PJI with associated severe soft tissue compromise (59%), collateral ligament deficiency (49%), extensor mechanism compromise (48%), or type 3 bone defects (44%). Complications and outcomes were assessed. Complications with the use of static spacers were common and included further bone loss (46%), spacer migration (16%), extensor mechanism compromise (16%), cast or related soft tissue injuries (16%), fracture (13%), and spacer breakage (3%). Ultimately, 22% of patients underwent amputation. Patient variables such as age and body mass index were not associated with outcomes. Static knee spacers are associated with substantial morbidity in challenging clinical scenarios and alternatives may need to be considered. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(2):122-126, 2023).

在具有挑战性的临床情况下,静态无关节膝关节垫片与高发病率相关。
在具有挑战性的临床情况下,与使用静态无关节膝关节间隔器治疗假体周围关节感染(PJI)相关的发病率尚未得到很好的描述。从2011年到2019年,两所学术机构使用了63个模块静态垫片治疗伴有严重软组织损伤(59%)、副韧带缺陷(49%)、伸肌机制损伤(48%)或3型骨缺损(44%)的PJI。评估并发症和结果。使用静态垫片的并发症很常见,包括进一步的骨质流失(46%)、垫片移位(16%)、伸肌机制受损(16%)、石膏或相关软组织损伤(16%)、骨折(13%)和垫片断裂(3%)。最终,22%的患者接受了截肢手术。患者变量如年龄和体重指数与结果无关。在具有挑战性的临床情况下,静态膝关节间隔器与大量发病率相关,可能需要考虑替代方案。[j] .外科骨科进展32(2):122- 126,2023。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信