Tania Shelby-James, Megan Rattray, Garry Raymond, Richard Reed
{"title":"Capacity building for mental health services: methodology and lessons learned from the Partners in Recovery initiative.","authors":"Tania Shelby-James, Megan Rattray, Garry Raymond, Richard Reed","doi":"10.1071/PY23003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Partners in Recovery (PIR) program was implemented by the Australian Government Department of Health. Its overriding aim was to improve the coordination of services for people with severe and persistent mental illness, and who have complex needs that are not being met. The PIR capacity-building project (CBP) was funded to provide capacity building activities to the nationwide network of consortia that were set up in 2013 to deliver PIR over a 3-year period. The purpose of this paper is to describe the design and findings from an evaluation of the PIR CBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The evaluation involved collecting feedback from consenting PIR staff via an online survey and follow-up semi-structured interviews. CBP activities included: state and national meetings; a web portal; teleconferences; webinars; a support facilitator mentor program; and tailored support from the CBP team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CBP made a positive contribution to the implementation and delivery of PIR. Staff highly valued activities that employed face-to-face interaction or provided informative knowledge exchange, and were appreciative of CBP staff being responsive and adaptable to their needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From this evaluation, we recommend the following: identify relevant functions (e.g. prioritise networking), select the right mode of delivery (e.g. establish an online presence) and abide by key principles (e.g. be responsive to staff needs). This information is informing the mental health workforce capacity building activities that our team is currently undertaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":8651,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":" ","pages":"NULL"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Partners in Recovery (PIR) program was implemented by the Australian Government Department of Health. Its overriding aim was to improve the coordination of services for people with severe and persistent mental illness, and who have complex needs that are not being met. The PIR capacity-building project (CBP) was funded to provide capacity building activities to the nationwide network of consortia that were set up in 2013 to deliver PIR over a 3-year period. The purpose of this paper is to describe the design and findings from an evaluation of the PIR CBP.
Methods: The evaluation involved collecting feedback from consenting PIR staff via an online survey and follow-up semi-structured interviews. CBP activities included: state and national meetings; a web portal; teleconferences; webinars; a support facilitator mentor program; and tailored support from the CBP team.
Results: The CBP made a positive contribution to the implementation and delivery of PIR. Staff highly valued activities that employed face-to-face interaction or provided informative knowledge exchange, and were appreciative of CBP staff being responsive and adaptable to their needs.
Conclusions: From this evaluation, we recommend the following: identify relevant functions (e.g. prioritise networking), select the right mode of delivery (e.g. establish an online presence) and abide by key principles (e.g. be responsive to staff needs). This information is informing the mental health workforce capacity building activities that our team is currently undertaking.
背景:康复伙伴(PIR)计划由澳大利亚政府卫生部实施。其首要目标是改善对患有严重和持续性精神疾病的人的服务协调,因为这些人的复杂需求没有得到满足。PIR能力建设项目(CBP)得到了资助,为2013年成立的全国性联合体网络提供能力建设活动,以在3年内实施PIR。本文旨在介绍 PIR CBP 的设计和评估结果:评估包括通过在线调查和后续半结构化访谈收集获得同意的 PIR 工作人员的反馈意见。CBP 活动包括:州和国家会议;门户网站;电话会议;网络研讨会;支持促进者导师计划;以及 CBP 团队提供的量身定制的支持:结果:CBP 为 PIR 的实施和交付做出了积极贡献。工作人员高度评价了那些采用面对面互动或提供信息知识交流的活动,并对 CBP 工作人员积极响应和适应他们的需求表示赞赏:从这次评估中,我们提出了以下建议:确定相关职能(如优先建立网络),选择正确的交付方式(如建立在线存在),遵守主要原则(如满足员工需求)。这些信息为我们团队目前正在开展的心理健康工作人员能力建设活动提供了参考。
期刊介绍:
Australian Journal of Primary Health integrates the theory and practise of community health services and primary health care. The journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research, reviews, policy reports and analyses from around the world. Articles cover a range of issues influencing community health services and primary health care, particularly comprehensive primary health care research, evidence-based practice (excluding discipline-specific clinical interventions) and primary health care policy issues.
Australian Journal of Primary Health is an important international resource for all individuals and organisations involved in the planning, provision or practise of primary health care.
Australian Journal of Primary Health is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University.