Two Distinct Deleterious Causative Variants in a Family with Multiple Cancer-Affected Patients.

Erfan Khorram, Mohammad A Tabatabaiefar, Mehrdad Zeinalian
{"title":"Two Distinct Deleterious Causative Variants in a Family with Multiple Cancer-Affected Patients.","authors":"Erfan Khorram,&nbsp;Mohammad A Tabatabaiefar,&nbsp;Mehrdad Zeinalian","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_366_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Only 5 to 10% of cancers are hereditary, but they are particularly important since they can be passed down from generation to generation, and family members are at elevated risk. Although screening methods are one of the essential strategies for dealing with hereditary cancers, they do not have high specificity and sensitivity. The emergence of whole-exome sequencing (WES) causes a significant increase in the diagnostic rate of cancer-causing variants in at-risk families.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed WES on the proband's DNA sample from an Iranian family with multiple cancer-affected members to identify potential causative variants. Multiple in silico tools were used to evaluate the candidate variants' pathogenicity and their effects on the protein's structure, function, and stability. Moreover, the candidate variants were co-segregated in the family with Sanger sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WES data analysis identified two pathogenic variants (<i>CHEK2:</i> NM_007194.4: c.538C>T, p.Arg180Cys and <i>MLH1:</i> NM_000249.4, c.844G>A, p.Ala282Thr). Sanger sequencing data showed each of the variants was incompletely segregated with phenotype, but both of them explained the patient's phenotype together. Also, the structural analysis demonstrated that due to the variant (c.538C>T), a salt bridge between arginine 180 and glutamic acid 149 was lost. Indeed, several protein stability tools described both variants as destabilizing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Herein, we interestingly identify two distinct deleterious causative variants (<i>CHEK2:</i> NM_007194.4: c.538C>T, p.Arg180Cys and <i>MLH1:</i> NM_000249.4, c.844G>A, p.Ala282Thr) in a family with several cancer-affected members. Furthermore, this study's findings established the utility of WES in the genetic diagnostics of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7225,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/89/ABR-12-203.PMC10492615.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_366_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Only 5 to 10% of cancers are hereditary, but they are particularly important since they can be passed down from generation to generation, and family members are at elevated risk. Although screening methods are one of the essential strategies for dealing with hereditary cancers, they do not have high specificity and sensitivity. The emergence of whole-exome sequencing (WES) causes a significant increase in the diagnostic rate of cancer-causing variants in at-risk families.

Materials and methods: We performed WES on the proband's DNA sample from an Iranian family with multiple cancer-affected members to identify potential causative variants. Multiple in silico tools were used to evaluate the candidate variants' pathogenicity and their effects on the protein's structure, function, and stability. Moreover, the candidate variants were co-segregated in the family with Sanger sequencing.

Results: The WES data analysis identified two pathogenic variants (CHEK2: NM_007194.4: c.538C>T, p.Arg180Cys and MLH1: NM_000249.4, c.844G>A, p.Ala282Thr). Sanger sequencing data showed each of the variants was incompletely segregated with phenotype, but both of them explained the patient's phenotype together. Also, the structural analysis demonstrated that due to the variant (c.538C>T), a salt bridge between arginine 180 and glutamic acid 149 was lost. Indeed, several protein stability tools described both variants as destabilizing.

Conclusion: Herein, we interestingly identify two distinct deleterious causative variants (CHEK2: NM_007194.4: c.538C>T, p.Arg180Cys and MLH1: NM_000249.4, c.844G>A, p.Ala282Thr) in a family with several cancer-affected members. Furthermore, this study's findings established the utility of WES in the genetic diagnostics of cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多癌患者家族中两种不同的有害致病变异
背景:只有5%到10%的癌症是遗传性的,但它们尤其重要,因为它们可以代代相传,而且家庭成员的风险很高。虽然筛查方法是治疗遗传性癌症的重要策略之一,但其特异性和敏感性不高。全外显子组测序(WES)的出现导致高危家庭中致癌变异的诊断率显著增加。材料和方法:我们对来自伊朗一个有多个癌症影响成员的家庭的先证者的DNA样本进行了WES检测,以确定潜在的致病变异。使用多种硅工具评估候选变异的致病性及其对蛋白质结构、功能和稳定性的影响。此外,候选变异用Sanger测序在家族中共分离。结果:WES数据分析鉴定出2个致病变异(CHEK2: NM_007194.4: c.538C>T, p.Arg180Cys和MLH1: NM_000249.4, c.844G>A, p.Ala282Thr)。Sanger测序数据显示,每一种变异都与表型不完全分离,但它们共同解释了患者的表型。此外,结构分析表明,由于变异(c.538C>T),精氨酸180和谷氨酸149之间的盐桥丢失。事实上,一些蛋白质稳定性工具将这两种变异描述为不稳定。结论:在此,我们有趣地在一个有几个癌症患者的家庭中发现了两种不同的有害致病变异(CHEK2: NM_007194.4: c.538C>T, p.Arg180Cys和MLH1: NM_000249.4, c.844G>A, p.Ala282Thr)。此外,本研究的发现确立了WES在癌症遗传诊断中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信