Comparison between pre-mortem and post-mortem cadaveric images for use with augmented reality headsets during dissection.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s00276-023-03239-z
Fardad Jabbary Aslany, Kimberly McBain, Liang Chen, Jeremy O'Brien, Geoffroy P J C Noel
{"title":"Comparison between pre-mortem and post-mortem cadaveric images for use with augmented reality headsets during dissection.","authors":"Fardad Jabbary Aslany,&nbsp;Kimberly McBain,&nbsp;Liang Chen,&nbsp;Jeremy O'Brien,&nbsp;Geoffroy P J C Noel","doi":"10.1007/s00276-023-03239-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Medical training has undergone many transformations to incorporate diagnostic imaging along side anatomical education. Post-mortem computed tomography (CT) scanning of body donors prior to dissection has been proposed. However, it poses challenges secondary to the embalming process and other post-mortem physiological changes that significantly alter the imaging quality. The purposes of this study were to compare the accuracy of pathology identification on pre- and post-mortem CT scans of body donors and to assess the integration of those scans in a dissection-based course, where these images were overlaid onto body donors using augmented reality (AR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in this study included 35 fourth year medical students, 5 radiology residents and 3 radiologists. A convergent, parallel mixed methods design was employed with quantitative measures that included statistical analyses of a double-blinded comparison of pathological lesions recognition, on both image sets, the group responses to a study participant survey and the login access data from imaging repository. The study also included qualitative analysis of post-elective structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The double-blinded comparison revealed that staff radiologists can only identify, on post-mortem images, 54.8% of the pathologies that they were able to detect on the pre-mortem scans. Analyses of the surveys and login access data reveal that 60% of radiology residents and 56% of students preferred pre-mortem scans and used those scans more often than post-mortem scans (67 access vs 36, respectively). However, post-mortem scans were significantly preferred when used to overlay onto body donors using AR (p = 0.0047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results show that post-mortem imaging can be valuable alongside pre-mortem imaging, as they represent the most concordance between the anatomical structures and pathologies seen on the images and what is being dissected.</p>","PeriodicalId":49296,"journal":{"name":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","volume":" ","pages":"1311-1319"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03239-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Medical training has undergone many transformations to incorporate diagnostic imaging along side anatomical education. Post-mortem computed tomography (CT) scanning of body donors prior to dissection has been proposed. However, it poses challenges secondary to the embalming process and other post-mortem physiological changes that significantly alter the imaging quality. The purposes of this study were to compare the accuracy of pathology identification on pre- and post-mortem CT scans of body donors and to assess the integration of those scans in a dissection-based course, where these images were overlaid onto body donors using augmented reality (AR).

Methods: Participants in this study included 35 fourth year medical students, 5 radiology residents and 3 radiologists. A convergent, parallel mixed methods design was employed with quantitative measures that included statistical analyses of a double-blinded comparison of pathological lesions recognition, on both image sets, the group responses to a study participant survey and the login access data from imaging repository. The study also included qualitative analysis of post-elective structured interviews.

Results: The double-blinded comparison revealed that staff radiologists can only identify, on post-mortem images, 54.8% of the pathologies that they were able to detect on the pre-mortem scans. Analyses of the surveys and login access data reveal that 60% of radiology residents and 56% of students preferred pre-mortem scans and used those scans more often than post-mortem scans (67 access vs 36, respectively). However, post-mortem scans were significantly preferred when used to overlay onto body donors using AR (p = 0.0047).

Conclusion: These results show that post-mortem imaging can be valuable alongside pre-mortem imaging, as they represent the most concordance between the anatomical structures and pathologies seen on the images and what is being dissected.

Abstract Image

解剖过程中与增强现实耳机配合使用的尸检前和尸检后尸体图像的比较。
目的:医学培训经历了许多转变,将诊断成像与侧解剖教育结合起来。有人提出在解剖前对捐献者进行尸检计算机断层扫描。然而,它带来了仅次于防腐过程和其他显著改变成像质量的死后生理变化的挑战。本研究的目的是比较遗体捐献者死前和死后CT扫描的病理学识别准确性,并评估这些扫描在基于解剖的课程中的集成性,在该课程中,使用增强现实(AR)将这些图像叠加到遗体捐献者上。方法:本研究的参与者包括35名四年级医学生,5名放射科住院医师和3名放射科医生。采用收敛、平行的混合方法设计,定量测量包括对两个图像集的病理损伤识别的双盲比较、对研究参与者调查的群体反应以及来自成像库的登录访问数据进行统计分析。该研究还包括对选后结构化访谈的定性分析。结果:双盲比较显示,放射科医生只能在尸检图像上识别出他们能够在尸检扫描中检测到的54.8%的病理。对调查和登录访问数据的分析显示,60%的放射科住院医师和56%的学生更喜欢尸检扫描,并且使用这些扫描的频率高于尸检扫描(分别为67次访问和36次访问)。然而,当使用AR(p = 0.0047)。结论:这些结果表明,死后成像与死前成像一样有价值,因为它们代表了图像上所见的解剖结构和病理与解剖内容之间的最一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Anatomy is a morphological science which cannot fail to interest the clinician. The practical application of anatomical research to clinical problems necessitates special adaptation and selectivity in choosing from numerous international works. Although there is a tendency to believe that meaningful advances in anatomy are unlikely, constant revision is necessary. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, the first international journal of Clinical anatomy has been created in this spirit. Its goal is to serve clinicians, regardless of speciality-physicians, surgeons, radiologists or other specialists-as an indispensable aid with which they can improve their knowledge of anatomy. Each issue includes: Original papers, review articles, articles on the anatomical bases of medical, surgical and radiological techniques, articles of normal radiologic anatomy, brief reviews of anatomical publications of clinical interest. Particular attention is given to high quality illustrations, which are indispensable for a better understanding of anatomical problems. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy is a journal written by anatomists for clinicians with a special interest in anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信