Molecular genetic testing does not improve the detection of fluoroquinolone resistance before transrectal prostate biopsy

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Michael A. Liss , Harshit Garg , Evgeni V. Sokurenko , Jan E. Patterson , Brian L. Wickes
{"title":"Molecular genetic testing does not improve the detection of fluoroquinolone resistance before transrectal prostate biopsy","authors":"Michael A. Liss ,&nbsp;Harshit Garg ,&nbsp;Evgeni V. Sokurenko ,&nbsp;Jan E. Patterson ,&nbsp;Brian L. Wickes","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2022.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQR) <em>Escherichia coli</em> (<em>E. coli</em>) causes transrectal prostate biopsy infections. We seek to further identify fluoroquinolones resistance by the incorporation of genetic profiling to influence antibiotic selection for transrectal prostate biopsy and whether the addition of this genetic testing could improve the prediction of FQR detection at the time of biopsy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In this prospective observational cohort study, rectal swabs were collected within 30 days of an upcoming prostate biopsy. These swabs were sent for phenotypic and genotypic assessment to predict FQR on the day of the biopsy. Phenotype: Specimens were inoculated onto MacConkey agar containing ciprofloxacin using standard culture techniques to determine FQR status. Genotype: We compared cultures to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sequence typing (<em>E.coli</em>- ST131/H30/ST69) and bacterial plasmids (<em>gyr</em>A, <em>qnr</em>Q, and <em>qnr</em>S). The presence of FQR on this testing was compared to the second rectal swab collected just before biopsy (2 hours after ciprofloxacin prophylaxis), which served as the gold standard for FQR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, the FQR rate was 23.6%. The bacterial plasmids (<em>qnr</em>) were present in 54.1% of samples, and multidrug-resistant <em>E. coli</em> ST131 was present in 12.5% of samples. In comparison, phenotypic assessment using rectal culture had a better prediction for the presence of FQR as compared to genotypic testing [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.85 in phenotype arm vs. AUC = 0.45 in genotype arm].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We detected a high prevalence of FQR genes in the rectum, but the addition of PCR-based genotyping did not improve the prediction of culture-based FQR at the time of biopsy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 194-199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/6a/main.PMC9747570.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQR) Escherichia coli (E. coli) causes transrectal prostate biopsy infections. We seek to further identify fluoroquinolones resistance by the incorporation of genetic profiling to influence antibiotic selection for transrectal prostate biopsy and whether the addition of this genetic testing could improve the prediction of FQR detection at the time of biopsy.

Materials and methods

In this prospective observational cohort study, rectal swabs were collected within 30 days of an upcoming prostate biopsy. These swabs were sent for phenotypic and genotypic assessment to predict FQR on the day of the biopsy. Phenotype: Specimens were inoculated onto MacConkey agar containing ciprofloxacin using standard culture techniques to determine FQR status. Genotype: We compared cultures to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sequence typing (E.coli- ST131/H30/ST69) and bacterial plasmids (gyrA, qnrQ, and qnrS). The presence of FQR on this testing was compared to the second rectal swab collected just before biopsy (2 hours after ciprofloxacin prophylaxis), which served as the gold standard for FQR.

Results

Overall, the FQR rate was 23.6%. The bacterial plasmids (qnr) were present in 54.1% of samples, and multidrug-resistant E. coli ST131 was present in 12.5% of samples. In comparison, phenotypic assessment using rectal culture had a better prediction for the presence of FQR as compared to genotypic testing [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.85 in phenotype arm vs. AUC = 0.45 in genotype arm].

Conclusion

We detected a high prevalence of FQR genes in the rectum, but the addition of PCR-based genotyping did not improve the prediction of culture-based FQR at the time of biopsy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分子基因检测不能提高经直肠前列腺活检前氟喹诺酮类药物耐药性的检测
背景氟喹诺酮耐药(FQR)大肠杆菌(E. coli)引起经直肠前列腺活检感染。我们试图通过结合基因谱来进一步确定氟喹诺酮类药物耐药性,以影响经直肠前列腺活检中抗生素的选择,以及增加这种基因检测是否可以提高活检时FQR检测的预测。材料和方法在这项前瞻性观察队列研究中,在即将进行的前列腺活检后30天内收集直肠拭子。这些拭子被送去进行表型和基因型评估,以预测活检当天的FQR。表型:将标本接种于含环丙沙星的麦康基琼脂上,采用标准培养技术测定FQR状态。基因型:我们将培养物与聚合酶链反应(PCR)序列分型(大肠杆菌- ST131/H30/ST69)和细菌质粒(gyrA, qnrQ和qnrS)进行比较。将该检测中FQR的存在与活检前(环丙沙星预防后2小时)收集的第二次直肠拭子进行比较,后者作为FQR的金标准。结果FQR率为23.6%。54.1%的样本中存在细菌质粒(qnr), 12.5%的样本中存在耐多药大肠杆菌ST131。相比之下,与基因型检测相比,使用直肠培养进行表型评估可以更好地预测FQR的存在[表型组的曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.85,而基因型组的AUC = 0.45]。结论我们检测到FQR基因在直肠中的高流行率,但pcr基因分型的增加并不能提高活检时基于培养的FQR的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信