Are We Sure We Fully Understand What an Infodemic Is? A Global Perspective on Infodemiological Problems.

JMIRx med Pub Date : 2022-07-21 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.2196/36510
Alessandro Rovetta, Lucia Castaldo
{"title":"Are We Sure We Fully Understand What an Infodemic Is? A Global Perspective on Infodemiological Problems.","authors":"Alessandro Rovetta, Lucia Castaldo","doi":"10.2196/36510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infodemic is defined as an information epidemic that can lead to engaging in dangerous behavior. Although the most striking manifestations of the latter occurred on social media, some studies show that dismisinformation is significantly influenced by numerous additional factors, both web-based and offline. These include social context, age, education, personal knowledge and beliefs, mood, psychological defense mechanisms, media resonance, and how news and information are presented to the public. Moreover, various incorrect scientific practices related to disclosure, publication, and training can also fuel such a phenomenon. Therefore, in this opinion article, we seek to provide a comprehensive overview of the issues that need to be addressed to bridge the gap between science and the public and build resilience to the infodemic. In particular, we stress that the infodemic cannot be curbed by simply disproving every single false or misleading information since the belief system and the cultural or educational background are chief factors regarding the success of fake news. For this reason, we believe that the process of forming a critical sense should begin with children in schools (ie, when the mind is more receptive to new ways of learning). Furthermore, we also believe that themes such as scientific method and evidence should be at the heart of the university education of a future scientist. Indeed, both the public and scientists must be educated on the concepts of evidence and validity of sources, as well as learning how to dialogue appropriately with each other. Finally, we believe that the scientific publishing process could be greatly improved by paying reviewers for their work and by ceasing to pursue academic success at all costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73558,"journal":{"name":"JMIRx med","volume":"3 3","pages":"e36510"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9642843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIRx med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/36510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infodemic is defined as an information epidemic that can lead to engaging in dangerous behavior. Although the most striking manifestations of the latter occurred on social media, some studies show that dismisinformation is significantly influenced by numerous additional factors, both web-based and offline. These include social context, age, education, personal knowledge and beliefs, mood, psychological defense mechanisms, media resonance, and how news and information are presented to the public. Moreover, various incorrect scientific practices related to disclosure, publication, and training can also fuel such a phenomenon. Therefore, in this opinion article, we seek to provide a comprehensive overview of the issues that need to be addressed to bridge the gap between science and the public and build resilience to the infodemic. In particular, we stress that the infodemic cannot be curbed by simply disproving every single false or misleading information since the belief system and the cultural or educational background are chief factors regarding the success of fake news. For this reason, we believe that the process of forming a critical sense should begin with children in schools (ie, when the mind is more receptive to new ways of learning). Furthermore, we also believe that themes such as scientific method and evidence should be at the heart of the university education of a future scientist. Indeed, both the public and scientists must be educated on the concepts of evidence and validity of sources, as well as learning how to dialogue appropriately with each other. Finally, we believe that the scientific publishing process could be greatly improved by paying reviewers for their work and by ceasing to pursue academic success at all costs.

我们确定完全了解什么是信息时代吗?从全球视角看待信息虚拟学问题。
信息流行病被定义为可导致危险行为的信息流行病。尽管后者最显著的表现形式出现在社交媒体上,但一些研究表明,网络和线下的许多其他因素也会对失实信息产生重大影响。这些因素包括社会环境、年龄、教育程度、个人知识和信仰、情绪、心理防御机制、媒体共鸣以及新闻和信息如何呈现给公众。此外,与信息披露、出版和培训相关的各种不正确的科学做法也会助长这种现象。因此,在这篇观点文章中,我们试图全面概述需要解决的问题,以弥合科学与公众之间的鸿沟,建立抵御信息瘟疫的能力。我们特别强调,要遏制信息瘟疫,不能简单地反驳每一条虚假或误导性信息,因为信仰体系、文化或教育背景是假新闻成功的主要因素。因此,我们认为,批判意识的形成过程应从学校里的孩子们开始(即当他们的思维更容易接受新的学习方式时)。此外,我们还认为,科学方法和证据等主题应成为未来科学家大学教育的核心。事实上,公众和科学家都必须接受有关证据和资料来源有效性的教育,并学习如何彼此进行适当的对话。最后,我们认为,通过为审稿人的工作支付报酬,以及不再不惜一切代价追求学术成功,科学出版过程可以得到极大的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信