TENDINopathy Severity Assessment - Achilles (TENDINS-A): Development and Content Validity Assessment of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Achilles Tendinopathy.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Myles C Murphy, Richard Newsham-West, Jill Cook, Ruth L Chimenti, Robert-Jan de Vos, Nicola Maffulli, Peter Malliaras, Nonhlanhla Mkumbuzi, Craig Purdam, J Turner Vosseller, Ebonie K Rio
{"title":"TENDINopathy Severity Assessment - Achilles (TENDINS-A): Development and Content Validity Assessment of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Achilles Tendinopathy.","authors":"Myles C Murphy, Richard Newsham-West, Jill Cook, Ruth L Chimenti, Robert-Jan de Vos, Nicola Maffulli, Peter Malliaras, Nonhlanhla Mkumbuzi, Craig Purdam, J Turner Vosseller, Ebonie K Rio","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To develop a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) assessing TENDINopathy Severity of the Achilles (TENDINS-Achilles) and evaluate its content validity. <b>DESIGN:</b> Mixed-methods, modified Delphi. <b>METHODS:</b> We performed 1 round of semistructured one-on-one interview responses with professionals and patients, for initial item generation. This was followed by 1 round of survey responses for professionals and a final round of semistructured one-on-one interviews with patients. The work culminated in a PROM to quantify Achilles tendinopathy severity under the core health domain of disability. Participants identified 3 subdomains contributing to the severity of disability of Achilles tendinopathy: pain, symptoms, and functional capacity. <b>RESULTS:</b> All 8 patient participants invited to participate were enrolled. Forty professional participants (50% women, six different continents) were invited to participate and 30 were enrolled (75% response rate). Therefore, a total of 30 professionals and 8 patients were included within this study. Following 3 rounds of qualitative or quantitative feedback, this study has established the content validity of TENDINS-A (good relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness) as a new PROM to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy, which assesses aspects of pain, symptoms, and functional capacity. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> TENDINS-A has established content validity and is appropriate for use with clinical and research populations. We recommend users interpret TENDINS-A results cautiously, until further testing evaluates the most appropriate scoring scale, reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, and responsiveness of TENDINS-A. Until these psychometric properties are established, we suggest using TENDINS-A alongside existing tools. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):1-16. Epub: 24 August 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11964</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"0 11","pages":"70-85"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11964","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) assessing TENDINopathy Severity of the Achilles (TENDINS-Achilles) and evaluate its content validity. DESIGN: Mixed-methods, modified Delphi. METHODS: We performed 1 round of semistructured one-on-one interview responses with professionals and patients, for initial item generation. This was followed by 1 round of survey responses for professionals and a final round of semistructured one-on-one interviews with patients. The work culminated in a PROM to quantify Achilles tendinopathy severity under the core health domain of disability. Participants identified 3 subdomains contributing to the severity of disability of Achilles tendinopathy: pain, symptoms, and functional capacity. RESULTS: All 8 patient participants invited to participate were enrolled. Forty professional participants (50% women, six different continents) were invited to participate and 30 were enrolled (75% response rate). Therefore, a total of 30 professionals and 8 patients were included within this study. Following 3 rounds of qualitative or quantitative feedback, this study has established the content validity of TENDINS-A (good relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness) as a new PROM to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy, which assesses aspects of pain, symptoms, and functional capacity. CONCLUSION: TENDINS-A has established content validity and is appropriate for use with clinical and research populations. We recommend users interpret TENDINS-A results cautiously, until further testing evaluates the most appropriate scoring scale, reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, and responsiveness of TENDINS-A. Until these psychometric properties are established, we suggest using TENDINS-A alongside existing tools. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):1-16. Epub: 24 August 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11964.

肌腱病变严重程度评估-阿喀琉斯(TENDINS-A):一种新的阿喀琉斯腱病变患者报告结果指标的开发和内容有效性评估。
目的:开发一种新的评估跟腱病变严重程度的患者报告结果测量(PROM),并评估其内容的有效性。设计:混合方法,修改Delphi。方法:我们对专业人员和患者进行了一轮半结构化的一对一访谈,以进行初步项目生成。随后,对专业人员进行了一轮调查,并对患者进行了最后一轮半结构化的一对一访谈。这项工作最终导致了一项PROM,以量化残疾核心健康领域下跟腱疾病的严重程度。参与者确定了导致跟腱病残疾严重程度的3个亚结构域:疼痛、症状和功能能力。结果:所有8名受邀参与的患者均被纳入研究。40名专业参与者(50%为女性,来自六大洲)被邀请参加,30人被招募(75%的响应率)。因此,共有30名专业人员和8名患者被纳入本研究。经过三轮定性或定量反馈,本研究确定了TENDINS-A(具有良好的相关性、可理解性和全面性)作为一种新的PROM的内容有效性,以评估跟腱病的严重程度,该PROM评估疼痛、症状和功能能力。结论:TENDINS-A具有既定的内容有效性,适合临床和研究人群使用。我们建议用户谨慎解读TENDINS-A的结果,直到进一步的测试评估出最合适的评分量表、可靠性、结构有效性、标准有效性和TENDINS-A.的反应性。在建立这些心理测量特性之前,我们建议将TENDINS-A与现有工具一起使用。骨科运动物理杂志2023;53(11):1-16.Epub:2023年8月24日。doi:10.2519/josp.2023.11964。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信