Test–Retest Reliability and Precision of the Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"Test–Retest Reliability and Precision of the Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.01.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to determine the test–retest reliability and precision of Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer (RIHM) in healthy adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>Twenty-nine participants originally recruited via convenience sampling at a Midwestern state fair returned approximately 8 days later for retest. An average of three trials for each of the five intrinsic hand strength measurements were collected using the same technique that was used during initial testing. Test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient or ICC</span><sub>(2,3)</sub><span> and precision was evaluated using the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change (MDC</span><sub>90</sub>)/MDC%.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across all measures of intrinsic strength, the RIHM and its standardized procedures had excellent test–retest reliability. Index finger metacarpophalangeal flexion demonstrated the lowest reliability, and right small finger abduction, left thumb carpometacarpal abduction, and index finger metacarpophalangeal abduction tests had the highest reliability. Precision, as evidenced by SEM and MDC values, was excellent for tests of left index and bilateral small finger abduction strength and acceptable for all other measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Test–retest reliability and precision of RIHM across all measurements was excellent.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>These findings indicate that RIHM is a reliable and precise tool in measuring intrinsic strength of hands of healthy adults, although further research is needed in clinical populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":"49 11","pages":"Pages 1137.e1-1137.e7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502323000461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the test–retest reliability and precision of Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer (RIHM) in healthy adults.

Methods

Twenty-nine participants originally recruited via convenience sampling at a Midwestern state fair returned approximately 8 days later for retest. An average of three trials for each of the five intrinsic hand strength measurements were collected using the same technique that was used during initial testing. Test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient or ICC(2,3) and precision was evaluated using the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change (MDC90)/MDC%.

Results

Across all measures of intrinsic strength, the RIHM and its standardized procedures had excellent test–retest reliability. Index finger metacarpophalangeal flexion demonstrated the lowest reliability, and right small finger abduction, left thumb carpometacarpal abduction, and index finger metacarpophalangeal abduction tests had the highest reliability. Precision, as evidenced by SEM and MDC values, was excellent for tests of left index and bilateral small finger abduction strength and acceptable for all other measurements.

Conclusions

Test–retest reliability and precision of RIHM across all measurements was excellent.

Clinical relevance

These findings indicate that RIHM is a reliable and precise tool in measuring intrinsic strength of hands of healthy adults, although further research is needed in clinical populations.
Rotterdam手部固有肌张力计的可靠性和精密度测试。
目的:本研究的目的是确定鹿特丹内在手肌测量仪(RIHM)在健康成年人中的重新测试可靠性和准确性。方法:最初在中西部州博览会上通过方便抽样招募的29名参与者在大约8天后返回进行重新测试。使用与初始测试中使用的技术相同的技术,对五种内在手部强度测量中的每一种平均进行三次试验。使用组内相关系数或ICC(2,3)评估测试-再测试的可靠性,使用标准测量误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC90)/MDC%评估精度。结果:在所有内在强度测量中,RIHM及其标准化程序具有良好的再测试可靠性。食指掌指屈曲测试的可靠性最低,右手小指外展、左手拇指腕掌外展和食指掌指外展测试的可靠性最高。如SEM和MDC值所证明的,精度对于测试左食指和双侧小指外展强度是极好的,并且对于所有其他测量都是可接受的。结论:RIHM在所有测量中的测试-再测试可靠性和准确性都很好。临床相关性:这些发现表明,RIHM是测量健康成年人双手内在力量的可靠和精确的工具,尽管还需要在临床人群中进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信