Evaluation of hydrophilic surface osseointegration in low-density bone: Preclinical study in rabbits.

Q2 Medicine
Gustavo da Col Santos Pinto, Isadora Aparecida Ribeiro Dos Reis, Amanda de Carvalho Silva Leocádio, Matusalem Silva, Rafael Silveira Faeda, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira, Elcio Marcantonio
{"title":"Evaluation of hydrophilic surface osseointegration in low-density bone: Preclinical study in rabbits.","authors":"Gustavo da Col Santos Pinto,&nbsp;Isadora Aparecida Ribeiro Dos Reis,&nbsp;Amanda de Carvalho Silva Leocádio,&nbsp;Matusalem Silva,&nbsp;Rafael Silveira Faeda,&nbsp;Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira,&nbsp;Elcio Marcantonio","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202305352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of a hydrophilic surface (blasting + acid etching + immersion in isotonic solution) in comparison with that of a control surface (blasting + acid etching) using an experimental model of low-density bone. To perform the study, 24 rabbits were submitted to the installation of 4 implants in the iliac bone bilaterally: 2 implants with a control surface and 2 implants with a hydrophilic surface. The rabbits were euthanized at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant installation. After euthanasia, one implant from each surface was used to perform the removal torque analysis, and the other implant was used for the execution of non-decalcified histological sections and evaluation of the bone implant contact (% BIC) as well as the fraction of bone tissue area between the implant threads (% BBT). The implants with a hydrophilic surface presented higher %BIC (42.92 ± 2.85% vs. 29.49 ± 10.27%) and % BBT (34.32 ± 8.52% vs. 23.20 ± 6.75%) (p < 0.05) in the 2-week period. Furthermore, the hydrophilic surface presented higher removal torque in the 8-week period (76.13 ± 16.00 Ncm2 vs. 52.77 ± 13.49 Ncm2) (p<0.05). Implants with a hydrophilic surface exhibited acceleration in the process of osseointegration, culminating in greater secondary stability in low-density bone than in implants with a control surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"34 3","pages":"66-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of a hydrophilic surface (blasting + acid etching + immersion in isotonic solution) in comparison with that of a control surface (blasting + acid etching) using an experimental model of low-density bone. To perform the study, 24 rabbits were submitted to the installation of 4 implants in the iliac bone bilaterally: 2 implants with a control surface and 2 implants with a hydrophilic surface. The rabbits were euthanized at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant installation. After euthanasia, one implant from each surface was used to perform the removal torque analysis, and the other implant was used for the execution of non-decalcified histological sections and evaluation of the bone implant contact (% BIC) as well as the fraction of bone tissue area between the implant threads (% BBT). The implants with a hydrophilic surface presented higher %BIC (42.92 ± 2.85% vs. 29.49 ± 10.27%) and % BBT (34.32 ± 8.52% vs. 23.20 ± 6.75%) (p < 0.05) in the 2-week period. Furthermore, the hydrophilic surface presented higher removal torque in the 8-week period (76.13 ± 16.00 Ncm2 vs. 52.77 ± 13.49 Ncm2) (p<0.05). Implants with a hydrophilic surface exhibited acceleration in the process of osseointegration, culminating in greater secondary stability in low-density bone than in implants with a control surface.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

低密度骨亲水性表面骨整合的评价:兔临床前研究。
本研究的目的是使用低密度骨的实验模型,与对照表面(爆破+酸蚀)相比,评估亲水表面(爆破+酸蚀+浸入等渗溶液)的骨整合。为了进行这项研究,24只兔子被要求在双侧髂骨中安装4个植入物:2个具有控制表面的植入物和2个具有亲水表面的植入体。在植入物安装后2、4和8周对兔子实施安乐死。安乐死后,每个表面的一个植入物用于进行移除扭矩分析,另一个植入体用于执行非脱钙组织学切片和评估骨植入物接触(%BIC)以及植入物螺纹之间的骨组织面积分数(%BBT)。亲水表面植入物在2周内表现出更高的%BIC(42.92±2.85%对29.49±10.27%)和%BBT(34.32±8.52%对23.20±6.75%)(p<0.05)。此外,亲水表面在8周内表现出更高的去除扭矩(76.13±16.00 Ncm2 vs.52.77±13.49 Ncm2)(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brazilian dental journal
Brazilian dental journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信