George Sampaio Bonates Dos Santos, Ceci Nunes Carvalho, Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavares, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva, George Táccio de Miranda Candeiro, Etevaldo Matos Maia Filho
{"title":"Tissue repair capacity of bioceramic endodontic sealers in rat subcutaneous tissue.","authors":"George Sampaio Bonates Dos Santos, Ceci Nunes Carvalho, Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavares, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva, George Táccio de Miranda Candeiro, Etevaldo Matos Maia Filho","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202305161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the tissue repair capacity of four bioceramic endodontic sealers by quantifying type I and III collagen fibers. The following sealers were tested: EndoSequence BC Sealer (Brasseler, Brasseler, Savannah, USA), Bio C Sealer (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil), Bioroot RCS (Septodont, Santa Catarina, Brazil), and Sealer Plus BC (MKLife, Porto Alegre, Brazil). Polyethylene tubes 1.5 mm in diameter and 1 cm in length containing the endodontic sealers were implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of five rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus, Wistar lineage). After 14 days, the animals were euthanized, and collagen fibers were quantified from the histological tissue sections. Given a non-normal distribution of the data, a gamma regression with log link function was employed and implemented through the generalized linear models module, was used to test whether there was a significant difference between the sealers. The pairwise comparison was performed using Least significant difference. There were significant differences between the sealers for type I (p=0.001), type III (p=0.023), and total collagen (p=0.002). Overall, Bioroot sealer was statistically superior to the other sealers, except in the analysis of type III collagen, in which there was no difference between the Bioroot sealer and Bio C Sealer sealer and the control group (p>0.05). Bioroot RCS bioceramic endodontic sealer stimulates a greater production of collagen.</p>","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"34 3","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355271/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the tissue repair capacity of four bioceramic endodontic sealers by quantifying type I and III collagen fibers. The following sealers were tested: EndoSequence BC Sealer (Brasseler, Brasseler, Savannah, USA), Bio C Sealer (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil), Bioroot RCS (Septodont, Santa Catarina, Brazil), and Sealer Plus BC (MKLife, Porto Alegre, Brazil). Polyethylene tubes 1.5 mm in diameter and 1 cm in length containing the endodontic sealers were implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of five rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus, Wistar lineage). After 14 days, the animals were euthanized, and collagen fibers were quantified from the histological tissue sections. Given a non-normal distribution of the data, a gamma regression with log link function was employed and implemented through the generalized linear models module, was used to test whether there was a significant difference between the sealers. The pairwise comparison was performed using Least significant difference. There were significant differences between the sealers for type I (p=0.001), type III (p=0.023), and total collagen (p=0.002). Overall, Bioroot sealer was statistically superior to the other sealers, except in the analysis of type III collagen, in which there was no difference between the Bioroot sealer and Bio C Sealer sealer and the control group (p>0.05). Bioroot RCS bioceramic endodontic sealer stimulates a greater production of collagen.
本研究旨在通过定量I型和III型胶原纤维来评估四种生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的组织修复能力。测试了以下密封剂:EndoSequence BC Sealer(Brasseler、Brasseler,Savannah,USA)、Bio C Sealer(Angelus,Londrina,巴西)、Bioroot RCS(Septodon,Santa Catarina,巴西)和Sealer Plus BC(MKLife,Porto Alegre,巴西)。将含有牙髓封闭剂的直径为1.5mm、长度为1cm的聚乙烯管植入五只大鼠(褐家鼠白化病,Wistar谱系)的皮下组织中。14天后,对动物实施安乐死,并从组织学组织切片中定量胶原纤维。给定数据的非正态分布,采用具有对数链接函数的伽马回归,并通过广义线性模型模块实现,用于测试密封剂之间是否存在显著差异。使用最小显著性差异进行成对比较。I型(p=0.001)、III型(p=0.023)和总胶原蛋白(p=0.002)的密封剂之间存在显著差异。总体而言,Bioroot密封剂在统计学上优于其他密封剂,但III型胶原蛋白的分析除外,其中Bioroot-RCS生物陶瓷根管封闭剂与对照组比较无显著性差异(p>0.05)。
期刊介绍:
Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.