{"title":"Urinary glyphosate biomonitoring of sprayers in vegetable farm in Thailand.","authors":"Sasivimol Bootsikeaw, Pornpimol Kongtip, Noppanun Nankongnab, Suttinun Chantanakul, Dusit Sujirarat, Redeerat Mahaboonpeeti, Phanthawee Khangkhun, Susan Woskie","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2020.1797471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Thailand, glyphosate is popular herbicide to control pests in the agricultural sector. This study aimed to measure glyphosate exposure concentrations through inhalation, dermal contact, and urinary glyphosate concentrations among 43 vegetable farmers spraying glyphosate in Bungphra Subdistrict, Phitsanulok Province. Four types of spraying equipment were used, manual pump backpack (<i>n</i> = 3), motorized spray backpack (<i>n</i> = 22), battery pump backpack (<i>n</i> = 16), and high pressure pump (<i>n</i> = 2). Breathing zone air samples were collected using glass fiber filters; dermal contact samples were collected using 100 cm<sup>2</sup> cotton patches attached on 10 body locations and urine samples were collected at 3 time points: morning void urine the day before spraying, the end of spraying event, and the morning void urine the next day of spraying. The results showed that the geometric mean (GM; geometric standard deviation [GSD]) of breathing zone concentrations of glyphosate exposure were 9.37 (10.17) μg/m<sup>3</sup>. The GM (GSD) of total dermal patches exposure concentrations were 7.57 (0.01) mg/h. The legs, back, and arms were the most exposed body areas. The GM (GSD) of urinary glyphosate was found highest among vegetable farmers using manual backpack 46.90 (1.35) μg/g creatinine. Farmers should wear masks and boots to reduce glyphosate exposure by inhalation and dermal contact.</p>","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":"27 4","pages":"1019-1036"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10807039.2020.1797471","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2020.1797471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
In Thailand, glyphosate is popular herbicide to control pests in the agricultural sector. This study aimed to measure glyphosate exposure concentrations through inhalation, dermal contact, and urinary glyphosate concentrations among 43 vegetable farmers spraying glyphosate in Bungphra Subdistrict, Phitsanulok Province. Four types of spraying equipment were used, manual pump backpack (n = 3), motorized spray backpack (n = 22), battery pump backpack (n = 16), and high pressure pump (n = 2). Breathing zone air samples were collected using glass fiber filters; dermal contact samples were collected using 100 cm2 cotton patches attached on 10 body locations and urine samples were collected at 3 time points: morning void urine the day before spraying, the end of spraying event, and the morning void urine the next day of spraying. The results showed that the geometric mean (GM; geometric standard deviation [GSD]) of breathing zone concentrations of glyphosate exposure were 9.37 (10.17) μg/m3. The GM (GSD) of total dermal patches exposure concentrations were 7.57 (0.01) mg/h. The legs, back, and arms were the most exposed body areas. The GM (GSD) of urinary glyphosate was found highest among vegetable farmers using manual backpack 46.90 (1.35) μg/g creatinine. Farmers should wear masks and boots to reduce glyphosate exposure by inhalation and dermal contact.
期刊介绍:
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment provides a resource for professionals researching and assessing environmental hazards to both humans and ecological systems. The editors expect papers published to be original, of sound science, purposeful for risk analysis (assessment, communication, management) and related areas, well written (in English), and a contribution to the scientific literature.
The journal''s emphasis is on publication of papers that contribute to improvements in human and ecological health. The journal is an international, fully peer-reviewed publication that publishes eight issues annually. The journal''s scope includes scientific and technical information and critical analysis in the following areas:
-Quantitative Risk Assessment-
Comparative Risk Assessment-
Integrated Human & Ecological Risk Assessment-
Risk Assessment Applications to Human & Ecosystems Health-
Exposure Assessment-
Environmental Fate Assessment-
Multi-Media Assessment-
Hazard Assessment-
Environmental Epidemiology-
Statistical Models and Methods-
Methods Development/Improvement-
Toxicokinetics Modeling-
Animal to Human Extrapolation-
Risk Perception/Communication-
Risk Management-
Regulatory Issues