Protamine dose to neutralize heparin at the completion of cardiopulmonary bypass can be reduced significantly without affecting post-operative bleeding.

Q2 Health Professions
Min-Ho Lee, Matthew Beck, Kenneth Shann
{"title":"Protamine dose to neutralize heparin at the completion of cardiopulmonary bypass can be reduced significantly without affecting post-operative bleeding.","authors":"Min-Ho Lee,&nbsp;Matthew Beck,&nbsp;Kenneth Shann","doi":"10.1051/ject/2023026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic anticoagulation with heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) should be neutralized by protamine administration to restore normal hemostasis. Our previous study showed the protamine-to-heparin ratio (P-to-H) of 1:1 (1 mg protamine:100 IU circulating heparin; 1.0 Ratio) is likely an overestimation. Thus, we reduced the P-to-H in the HMS Plus Hemostasis Management System to 0.9:1 (0.9 Ratio) for 5 months and then to 0.8:1 (0.8 Ratio). We monitored post-operative (post-op) bleeding in the setting of reduced protamine dose (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of 632 patients (209 for the 1.0 Ratio, 211 for 0.9 Ratio, 212 for 0.8 Ratio group) who underwent cardiac surgery to measure the reduction of PD and how it affects 24-hour (24 h) post-op chest tube output. We also analyzed the entire data set to explore whether further reduction of P-to-H is warranted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While there was no difference in the indexed heparin dose among the three groups, we achieved a significant reduction in the indexed actual protamine dose (APDi) by 24% (0.9 Ratio) and 31% (0.8 Ratio) reductions compared to the 1.0 Ratio group. On average, APDi was 88 ± 22, 67 ± 18, and 61 ± 15 mg/m<sup>2</sup> in the 1.0, 0.9, and 0.8 Ratio groups, respectively. We found no significant difference in 24 h post-op bleeding among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>1.0 Ratio at the completion of CPB is likely an excessive administration of protamine. With the stepwise reduction of PD, we observed no increase in post-op bleeding, which may indicate that no meaningful increase in heparin rebound occurred. In addition, further analysis of the entire data set demonstrates that a 0.75 Ratio is likely sufficient to neutralize the heparin completely.</p>","PeriodicalId":39644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology","volume":"55 3","pages":"105-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2023026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systemic anticoagulation with heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) should be neutralized by protamine administration to restore normal hemostasis. Our previous study showed the protamine-to-heparin ratio (P-to-H) of 1:1 (1 mg protamine:100 IU circulating heparin; 1.0 Ratio) is likely an overestimation. Thus, we reduced the P-to-H in the HMS Plus Hemostasis Management System to 0.9:1 (0.9 Ratio) for 5 months and then to 0.8:1 (0.8 Ratio). We monitored post-operative (post-op) bleeding in the setting of reduced protamine dose (PD).

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 632 patients (209 for the 1.0 Ratio, 211 for 0.9 Ratio, 212 for 0.8 Ratio group) who underwent cardiac surgery to measure the reduction of PD and how it affects 24-hour (24 h) post-op chest tube output. We also analyzed the entire data set to explore whether further reduction of P-to-H is warranted.

Results: While there was no difference in the indexed heparin dose among the three groups, we achieved a significant reduction in the indexed actual protamine dose (APDi) by 24% (0.9 Ratio) and 31% (0.8 Ratio) reductions compared to the 1.0 Ratio group. On average, APDi was 88 ± 22, 67 ± 18, and 61 ± 15 mg/m2 in the 1.0, 0.9, and 0.8 Ratio groups, respectively. We found no significant difference in 24 h post-op bleeding among the three groups.

Conclusion: 1.0 Ratio at the completion of CPB is likely an excessive administration of protamine. With the stepwise reduction of PD, we observed no increase in post-op bleeding, which may indicate that no meaningful increase in heparin rebound occurred. In addition, further analysis of the entire data set demonstrates that a 0.75 Ratio is likely sufficient to neutralize the heparin completely.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

体外循环完成时,鱼精蛋白中和肝素的剂量可以显著减少,而不影响术后出血。
背景:体外循环(CPB)中应用肝素全身性抗凝治疗应与鱼精蛋白治疗相中和,以恢复正常止血。我们之前的研究表明,鱼精蛋白与肝素的比例(P-to-H)为1:1 (1 mg鱼精蛋白:100 IU循环肝素;1.0比率)可能是高估了。因此,我们将HMS +止血管理系统的P-to-H降低到0.9:1(0.9比),持续5个月,再降低到0.8:1(0.8比)。我们在降低鱼精蛋白剂量(PD)的情况下监测术后出血。方法:我们对632例接受心脏手术的患者(1.0比率组209例,0.9比率组211例,0.8比率组212例)进行回顾性研究,以测量PD降低及其对术后24小时(24 h)胸管输出量的影响。我们还分析了整个数据集,以探讨是否有必要进一步降低P-to-H。结果:三组间肝素指数剂量无差异,但实际鱼精蛋白指数剂量(APDi)较1.0 Ratio组分别降低24% (0.9 Ratio)和31% (0.8 Ratio)。1.0、0.9、0.8比值组APDi平均值分别为88±22、67±18、61±15 mg/m2。我们发现三组术后24 h出血无显著差异。结论:CPB完成时比率为1.0可能是鱼精蛋白过量。随着PD的逐步降低,我们观察到术后出血没有增加,这可能表明肝素反弹没有明显增加。此外,对整个数据集的进一步分析表明,0.75的比率可能足以完全中和肝素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology
Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Journal of Extracorporeal Technology is dedicated to the study and practice of Basic Science and Clinical issues related to extracorporeal circulation. Areas emphasized in the Journal include: •Cardiopulmonary Bypass •Cardiac Surgery •Cardiovascular Anesthesia •Hematology •Blood Management •Physiology •Fluid Dynamics •Laboratory Science •Coagulation and Hematology •Transfusion •Business Practices •Pediatric Perfusion •Total Quality Management • Evidence-Based Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信