Early effects of very early cochlear implant activation on tinnitus.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ivy Yenwen Chau, Sophia Yung-Hsia Li, An-Suey Shiao, Albina S Islam, Daniel H Coelho
{"title":"Early effects of very early cochlear implant activation on tinnitus.","authors":"Ivy Yenwen Chau,&nbsp;Sophia Yung-Hsia Li,&nbsp;An-Suey Shiao,&nbsp;Albina S Islam,&nbsp;Daniel H Coelho","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cochlear implantation (CI) has long been the standard of care for patients with severe-to-profound hearing impairment. Yet the benefits of CI extend far beyond speech understanding, with mounting recent literature supporting its role in tinnitus abatement. However, those studies have uniformly analyzed the effects of tinnitus after the traditional 3-4 weeks waiting period between CI surgery and device activation. As many clinics are shifting these waiting intervals to become shorter (in some cases within 24 hours, little is known about tinnitus abatement very early in the postoperative period. The aim of this study was to compare preoperative and postoperative tinnitus handicaps in this unique but growing population of very early-activated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven adults with severe-to-profound hearing impairment with chronic tinnitus (>6 months) were included. Patients with concomitant psychiatric disorders were excluded. All patients were implanted with the same array and were switched on within 24 hours after the surgery. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) was recorded preoperatively, immediately after activation at 24 hours postoperatively, at 1 week, 2 weeks, and I month after activation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare values between preoperative assessment and respective fitting sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean THI 24 hours after implantation increased in comparison to that assessed preoperatively (77.6 vs 72.5, p = 0.001). By 1 week after surgery, the THI had decreased to 54.9 ( p < 0.001). This trend continued and was statistically significant at 2 weeks (36.0, p < 0.001) and 1 month (28.5, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On average, most patients with tinnitus will note a significant improvement in their tinnitus handicap when activated within 24 hours of CI. However, tinnitus does increase between surgery and 24 hours, most likely reflecting not only intracochlear changes, but modulation of the entire auditory pathway. Following this early rise, the tinnitus continues to abate over the following month. Patients with tinnitus may benefit from early activation, although should be counseled that they may experience an exacerbation during the very early postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":17251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","volume":"86 9","pages":"850-853"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) has long been the standard of care for patients with severe-to-profound hearing impairment. Yet the benefits of CI extend far beyond speech understanding, with mounting recent literature supporting its role in tinnitus abatement. However, those studies have uniformly analyzed the effects of tinnitus after the traditional 3-4 weeks waiting period between CI surgery and device activation. As many clinics are shifting these waiting intervals to become shorter (in some cases within 24 hours, little is known about tinnitus abatement very early in the postoperative period. The aim of this study was to compare preoperative and postoperative tinnitus handicaps in this unique but growing population of very early-activated patients.

Methods: Twenty-seven adults with severe-to-profound hearing impairment with chronic tinnitus (>6 months) were included. Patients with concomitant psychiatric disorders were excluded. All patients were implanted with the same array and were switched on within 24 hours after the surgery. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) was recorded preoperatively, immediately after activation at 24 hours postoperatively, at 1 week, 2 weeks, and I month after activation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare values between preoperative assessment and respective fitting sessions.

Results: Mean THI 24 hours after implantation increased in comparison to that assessed preoperatively (77.6 vs 72.5, p = 0.001). By 1 week after surgery, the THI had decreased to 54.9 ( p < 0.001). This trend continued and was statistically significant at 2 weeks (36.0, p < 0.001) and 1 month (28.5, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: On average, most patients with tinnitus will note a significant improvement in their tinnitus handicap when activated within 24 hours of CI. However, tinnitus does increase between surgery and 24 hours, most likely reflecting not only intracochlear changes, but modulation of the entire auditory pathway. Following this early rise, the tinnitus continues to abate over the following month. Patients with tinnitus may benefit from early activation, although should be counseled that they may experience an exacerbation during the very early postoperative period.

早期人工耳蜗激活对耳鸣的早期影响。
背景:长期以来,人工耳蜗植入(CI)一直是重度到重度听力障碍患者的标准治疗方法。然而,CI的好处远远超出了语音理解,最近越来越多的文献支持它在耳鸣缓解中的作用。然而,这些研究统一分析了CI手术和器械激活之间传统的3-4周等待期后耳鸣的影响。由于许多诊所正在将这些等待时间缩短(在某些情况下在24小时内),因此对术后早期耳鸣的缓解知之甚少。这项研究的目的是比较术前和术后耳鸣障碍在这个独特的,但不断增长的人群非常早激活的患者。方法:选取27例成人重度至重度听力障碍伴慢性耳鸣患者(>6个月)。排除伴有精神障碍的患者。所有患者都植入了相同的阵列,并在手术后24小时内接通。术前、激活后24小时、激活后1周、2周和1个月分别记录耳鸣障碍量表(THI)。使用Wilcoxon sign -rank检验比较术前评估和各自拟合阶段之间的值。结果:植入后24小时THI平均值较术前增加(77.6 vs 72.5, p = 0.001)。术后1周THI降至54.9 (p < 0.001)。这一趋势在2周(36.0,p < 0.001)和1个月(28.5,p < 0.001)时继续存在并具有统计学意义。结论:平均而言,大多数耳鸣患者在24小时内激活CI后,耳鸣障碍会有显著改善。然而,从手术到24小时,耳鸣确实会增加,很可能不仅反映了耳蜗内的变化,还反映了整个听觉通路的调节。在这种早期的上升之后,耳鸣在接下来的一个月里继续减弱。耳鸣患者可能受益于早期激活,尽管应该被告知他们可能会在术后早期经历恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
15.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, previously known as the Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), has a long history of publishing scientific papers and has continuously made substantial contribution in the understanding and progress of a broad range of biomedical sciences. It is published monthly by Wolters Kluwer Health and indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), MEDLINE®, Index Medicus, EMBASE, CAB Abstracts, Sociedad Iberoamericana de Informacion Cientifica (SIIC) Data Bases, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Global Health. JCMA is the official and open access journal of the Chinese Medical Association, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China and is an international forum for scholarly reports in medicine, surgery, dentistry and basic research in biomedical science. As a vehicle of communication and education among physicians and scientists, the journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Reports of professional practice will need to demonstrate academic robustness and scientific rigor. Outstanding scholars are invited to give their update reviews on the perspectives of the evidence-based science in the related research field. Article types accepted include review articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications and letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信